[pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

I saw that I haven't built the latest snapshot (20031212) for Fedora Core 
1, and began building it.

I got an error.

+ make all
make  all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0/src'
cd .. && \
  /bin/sh /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0/config/missing --run 
automake-1.7 --foreign  src/Makefile
configure.ac:9: version mismatch.  This is Automake 1.7.8,
configure.ac:9: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE
configure.ac:9: comes from Automake 1.7.5.  You should recreate
configure.ac:9: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again.
 
make[2]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.77409 (%build)


Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code?

Regards,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4BHZtl86P3SPfQ4RAieVAKC34SEd/uXodHTweYF/fRAk63qykgCgpqKj
Gdi+7r2Vl/+ByEAckdy9Hkk=
=7tAn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
 

> -Original Message-
> From: Devrim GUNDUZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 17 December 2003 08:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot 
> of pgadmin3
> 
> 
> Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code?

Hi Devrim,

Hmm, odd. You could try running the bootstrap script.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[pgadmin-hackers] CVS moved

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
Hi all,

The cvs has now been moved. The new root is:

:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/projects

The IP address has also changed but will take a liitle while to work
it's way around the DNS - it is now 80.176.1.156.

I have left the old repository in place for now but made it read only,
primarily to prevent any scripts fouling up. I would suggest that a
fresh checkout is the easiest way to update to the new root.

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Build problem on 'latest' snapshot of pgadmin3

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi Dave,

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Dave Page wrote:

> > Should I run aclocal? Or do we need to change something in the code?

> Hmm, odd. You could try running the bootstrap script.

Ok. I've edited the spec file to run bootstrap script. Package now 
building. I'll upload the spec and the new rpm until tonight.

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4EmAtl86P3SPfQ4RAqKoAKDh4RV+RNuQRNIey5YkoB6QVnvTWQCgoC75
LwO/chvUeQ/G4eTg2P5YIXg=
=8nCn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])


[pgadmin-hackers] Build error on FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

Latest snapshot (20031212) failed to build on FC1. I'm using the latest 
wxwindows packages to buil them. Here is the error:

===
pgConn.o(.text+0x17e4): In function `pgConn::IsSSLconnected()':
db/pgConn.cpp:194: undefined reference to `PQgetssl'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [pgadmin3] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/pgadmin3-1.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10723 (%build)
=== 

Regards,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4FMltl86P3SPfQ4RArePAJ4tB2hnWAb46su5QZD4hjZkXwNxZgCcDxg6
47VTya8OSfvSRgLSM/aJxmI=
=JfLv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread blacknoz

Hi devrim,

Message d'origine
>Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:20:26 +0200 (EET)
>De: Devrim GUNDUZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sujet: [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Hi,
>
>Tha latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should 
>upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight.


Are you doing some dynamic linking ? We should all do static linking against our wx 
snapshot. So, the wx rpms should not appear in install dependencies but just 
build-requires.
Users should not install them, only developers or persons who want to build pgAdmin3 
by themselves.

If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :)

Regards,
Raphaël



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


[pgadmin-hackers] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

The latest wxWindows packages were built for FC1 and uploaded to snake.. 
err... developer.pgadmin.org :)

http://developer.pgadmin.org/snapshots/wxwindows/FC1/20031010.9/

Tha latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should 
upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight.

Regards,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4EoMtl86P3SPfQ4RAmE5AJ43kyphWsGnna8+fXCPWKX2/ppiaACgtivI
lpaMvULohOQa6QJlHZILMq8=
=CfCn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for FC1

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


Hi Raphaël,

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> >The latest snapshot uses and requires these rpms; so FC1 users should 
> >upgrade to this package. I'll upload the latest snapshot for FC1 tonight.
 
> Are you doing some dynamic linking ? We should all do static linking 
> against our wx snapshot. So, the wx rpms should not appear in install 
> dependencies but just build-requires. Users should not install them, 
> only developers or persons who want to build pgAdmin3 by themselves.

Arrrggh...

Yep, users do not need to install wxwindows packages. They are only 
required during build process .

Next time, I'll not post an e-mail if I'm very busy/or drunk :-)

So, users: You do not need to upgrade wxwindows packages :)

> If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :)

I keep an archive of all e-mails I get :-)

Regards,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4J5Vtl86P3SPfQ4RAuwoAJ0Rwd/YPt6kiL6kMamfio7uAU713ACdElpl
MpODQFSVFzTlG/QEErGsHtA=
=cYnB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for

2003-12-17 Thread Andreas Pflug
Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

If I misunderstood what you wrote feel free to trash my mail! :)
   

I keep an archive of all e-mails I get :-)

 

There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks...
Should I forward you my spam for archiving too? :->
Regards,
Andreas


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
  http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] New wxwindows packages for

2003-12-17 Thread Devrim GUNDUZ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andreas Pflug wrote:

> There must be *some* way to fill up these big harddisks...

#df
Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 20161172  16482996   2654036  87% /home
/dev/sda2 35215272   4693244  28733192  15% /var/spool/mail

We should keep on trying ;)

#du -sk mail
2679000  mail

heh heh

> Should I forward you my spam for archiving too? :->

No, please ;)

BTW, did anyone find time to find out the cause of the problem I've 
reported today?

Regards,
- -- 
Devrim GUNDUZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.TDMSoft.com
http://www.gunduz.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4KSZtl86P3SPfQ4RAl7GAKCAzG3buGGSIw2GG6u5/qPBPylgUwCgii6l
YJtbx+e5eLwAdUL9cMBxBL8=
=INPB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


[pgadmin-hackers] Server Problem

2003-12-17 Thread Dave Page
OK, obviously these things are sent to try us :-)

The new server hosting the cvs and developer has developed what we can
only put down to a motherboard fault - basically;

- The system clock is running about twice as fast as it should, no
matter what I do with ntpd or adjtimex! Bizarrely though the hw clock is
fine, but I found some posts on the net suggesting there might be a
phase locked loop problem on the mobo.

- APIC errors have started appearing on boot for each CPU :-(

Currently, the system appears stable (it has never crashed), and the
system clock is being resynced to the hardware clock every 5 minutes so
if you see any odd timestamps in CVS, that's why!

We have two of these boards both of which have had problems (the other
is actually in Germany being repaired at the moment!) - suffice it to
say a replacement will be ordered and fitted ASAP (Intel this time
instead of Gigabyte). Unfortunately we had another one die completely
yesterday (a very old MSI with dodgey electrolytic capacitors) so we
don't have a spare in stock right now.

Anyhoo, just thought I'd give you a heads up.

Regards, Dave.

PS. I think I'm getting the flu so may be offline for a coupla days :-(

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend