[pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin installer name under Windows
Dear Dave, Given the large number of sites where pgAdmin will be registered, it would be better to provide the latest pgadmin installer for Windows under the same name (=no versioning). Some sites recommend this. Example: pgadmin3.zip (or whatever). This shall not stop us from also providing the normal installer pgadmin3-1_0_2.zip What do you think? Cheers, Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin installer name under Windows
-Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 February 2004 10:00 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pgAdmin installer name under Windows Dear Dave, Given the large number of sites where pgAdmin will be registered, it would be better to provide the latest pgadmin installer for Windows under the same name (=no versioning). Some sites recommend this. Example: pgadmin3.zip (or whatever). This shall not stop us from also providing the normal installer pgadmin3-1_0_2.zip What do you think? No problem, just add a symlink to the current version. Regards, Dave. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin installer name under Windows
Le Mercredi 4 Février 2004 11:03, Dave Page a écrit : No problem, just add a symlink to the current version. Interesting. After replication, do FTP servers support simlinks? We should try to see what happens. Jean-Michel ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin installer name under Windows
-Original Message- From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 February 2004 10:05 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pgAdmin installer name under Windows Le Mercredi 4 Février 2004 11:03, Dave Page a écrit : No problem, just add a symlink to the current version. Interesting. After replication, do FTP servers support simlinks? We should try to see what happens. Yes they do. We use them already for the snapshots, plus we have them in the main PostgreSQL tree. /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Isn't it 2.4.2, according to this (I've just updated my ports collection
prior to executing the following command, so this as current as it gets)?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports]$ make search name=pgadmin3
Port: pgadmin3-1.0.1_1
Path: /usr/ports/databases/pgadmin3
Info: PostgreSQL database design and management system
Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: databases
B-deps: XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0
XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 Xft-2.1.2 atk-1.4.1_1 expat-1.95.6_1
fontconfig-2.2.90_3 freetype2-2.1.5_1 gettext-0.12.1 glib-1.2.10_10
glib-2.2.3 gtk-1.2.10_10 gtk-2.2.4_1 imake-4.3.0_1 jpeg-6b_1
libiconv-1.9.1_3 pango-1.2.5 perl-5.6.1_15 pkgconfig-0.15.0 png-1.2.5_2
postgresql7-client-7.3.4_1 tiff-3.6.0 wxgtk-common-2.4.2
wxgtk-contrib-common-2.4.2 wxgtk2-2.4.2_1 wxgtk2-contrib-2.4.2
R-deps: XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0
XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 Xft-2.1.2 atk-1.4.1_1 expat-1.95.6_1
fontconfig-2.2.90_3 freetype2-2.1.5_1 gettext-0.12.1 glib-1.2.10_10
glib-2.2.3 gtk-1.2.10_10 gtk-2.2.4_1 imake-4.3.0_1 jpeg-6b_1
libiconv-1.9.1_3 pango-1.2.5 perl-5.6.1_15 pkgconfig-0.15.0 png-1.2.5_2
postgresql7-client-7.3.4_1 tiff-3.6.0 wxgtk-common-2.4.2
wxgtk-contrib-common-2.4.2 wxgtk2-2.4.2_1 wxgtk2-contrib-2.4.2
What it says in the Makefile probably means that if you have wx installed,
it requires at least 2.4.0. If you don't it'll go for the 2.4.2 version.
But I'm relatively fresh with FreeBSD so don't hold my word for it :)
At 13:27 3.2.2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems they use 2.4.0... :(
Have a look to their makefile:
LIB_DEPENDS+= wx_gtk2_stc-2.4.0:${PORTSDIR}/x11-toolkits/wxgtk2-contrib
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--with-wx-config=wxgtk2-2.4-config
May be Hiroshi or Dave could contact the 'maintainer' to clarify the
situation ?
MAINTAINER= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message d'origine
Sujet: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:11:12 -
De: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 February 2004 12:10
To: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Le Mardi 3 Février 2004 12:37, Dave Page a écrit :
Did anyone know pgAdmin 3 was in the BSD ports collection?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/pgadmin3/
What wxGTK2 version are they using? Andreas patched version?
No idea, just spotted it whilst browsing the ports. I don't have BSD box
to look at it on right now.
Regards,
Miha
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 in BSD ports...
Miha Radej wrote: Isn't it 2.4.2, according to this (I've just updated my ports collection prior to executing the following command, so this as current as it gets)? That stuff is gtk1.2, i.e. not 2.0 and probably not unicode. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
