Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
Magnus Hagander a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: >> On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote: >>> Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the >>> next major version of pgAdmin? >> I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated. > > Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be > supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version. > I suppose you meant 1.8 :) Which means we will have to support two branches, REL-1_8_0_PATCHES and trunk, till 7.4 is officially declared unsupported. If this is the case, I'm ok with this. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Magnus Hagander a écrit : >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: >>> On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote: Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the next major version of pgAdmin? >>> I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated. >> Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be >> supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version. >> > > I suppose you meant 1.8 :) Yes, of course. > Which means we will have to support two branches, REL-1_8_0_PATCHES and > trunk, till 7.4 is officially declared unsupported. If this is the case, > I'm ok with this. Yes. But since we don't add features to REL-1_8_0_PATCHES, most changes won't be version specific, which makes life easier. At least that's how I figured it, and I *think* that's what Dave meant :-) //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
Magnus Hagander wrote: Guillaume Lelarge wrote: Magnus Hagander a écrit : On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote: Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the next major version of pgAdmin? I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated. Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version. I suppose you meant 1.8 :) Yes, of course. Which means we will have to support two branches, REL-1_8_0_PATCHES and trunk, till 7.4 is officially declared unsupported. If this is the case, I'm ok with this. Yes. But since we don't add features to REL-1_8_0_PATCHES, most changes won't be version specific, which makes life easier. At least that's how I figured it, and I *think* that's what Dave meant :-) Yes. Except it'll be 7.3 as well as 7.4. /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote: Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the next major version of pgAdmin? I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated. Ray. --- Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [pgadmin-support] dump shapefile
what would that mean? It´s all SQL, so what else is to be supported? Maybe shp2pgsql too? (i don´t see why, pgAdmin supports output to file (CSV) now, but no matching function backwards) Or would it mean collaborating with uDig (run by refractions btw), to provide a complete gis viewing experience? Sounds like that would only complicate things needlessly. Is anybody else out there interested in PostGIS support for pgAdmin? And finally, would it be possible for us to create an add-on to pgAdmin ourselves and share it w/ the world? (e.g. the one i proposed). That is, without introducing upgrade possibilities. Cheers, WBL On Nov 15, 2007 5:57 PM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Willy-Bas Loos wrote: > > I mean, would it be technically possible. > > It might be possible for us to provide funding if it is. > > > > On Nov 13, 2007 2:49 PM, Willy-Bas Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> One function that we would love to see in pgAdmin would be a wrapper > >> for pgsql2shp, so that you can export queries to a shapefile directly. > >> Would that be possible? > > It's possible, but we don't tend to add arbitrary functionality for > add-ons. If we look to support postgis, we need to do it fully. > > Regard,s Dave > ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
On 16/11/2007 13:27, Magnus Hagander wrote: Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version. Ah - fair 'nuff. In that case, whatever makes the developers' lives easier is grand by me... :-) Ray. --- Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 12:47:36PM +, Raymond O'Donnell wrote: > On 16/11/2007 12:24, Dave Page wrote: > >Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the > >next major version of pgAdmin? > > I'd be against dropping support before 7.x is officially deprecated. Just to clearify, if necessary: the current branches (1.6) would still be supported on 7.3/7.4. Just not the next version. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [pgadmin-support] dump shapefile
Willy-Bas Loos wrote: what would that mean? It´s all SQL, so what else is to be supported? Maybe shp2pgsql too? (i don´t see why, pgAdmin supports output to file (CSV) now, but no matching function backwards) Or would it mean collaborating with uDig (run by refractions btw), to provide a complete gis viewing experience? Sounds like that would only complicate things needlessly. Is anybody else out there interested in PostGIS support for pgAdmin? I'm interested in supporting it, but if we're going to do it, we should do it properly. If there really is nothing needed but to allow dumping of shapes, then thats fine, but it doesn't seem like it would be all (and I don't know PostGIS so can't really make an informed comment). Mark; can you comment on what would be needed in pgAdmin to claim we support PostGIS? And finally, would it be possible for us to create an add-on to pgAdmin ourselves and share it w/ the world? (e.g. the one i proposed). That is, without introducing upgrade possibilities. There is no add-in functionality at the moment, though we have discussed using the embeddable python interpreter to add something. I'm happy to accept suitable patches to do what is required in the core code though, provided they cover enough for us to claim we support PostGIS, and not just odd bits of it. /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
My 2€cent: dropping suport for 7.x in pgAdmin would give a healthy incentiv to update. Harald > Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the > next major version of pgAdmin? -- GHUM Harald Massa persuadere et programmare Harald Armin Massa Spielberger Straße 49 70435 Stuttgart 0173/9409607 fx 01212-5-13695179 - EuroPython 2008 will take place in Vilnius, Lithuania - Stay tuned! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [pgadmin-support] Installing pgAdmin3 version 1.8.0 on Ubuntu
Hi Gabriel, Guillaume, I plan to upload something this week end. Regards, Raphaël Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Gabriel Giroux a écrit : >> I'm using GNU/Linux Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon distribution on a Laptop where >> PostgreSQL 8.2.5 has been isntalled. >> >> I'm a newbie on Gnu/Linux OS and I would like to know if anybody in >> there has tested the new pgAdmin3 release on GNU/Linux Ubuntu Gutsy >> Gibbon distribution? >> >> I visited the pgAdmin3 Web page on Ubuntu Linux distribution regarding >> pgAdmin 3 packages install, but there is no reference on how to install >> pgAdmin3 Version 1.8.0 on the new Ubuntu release (Gutsy Gibbon). Does >> this mean we have to build and compile pgAdmin3 from source? >> > > The dapper one works great on my laptop (Kubuntu Gutsy Gibbon) but, > unfortunately, it's still release 1.6.3. > > Raphael, do you think you'll be able to build ubuntu packages for 1.8.0 > ? Thanks. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
[pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the next major version of pgAdmin? Thoughts? /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re : [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers
Hi, My 2€: as long as the last version supporting PG 7.x is easily downloadable from the web ... I don't think that till be a problem; for the users. It's just for you guys (and the PG people), to know whether this is acceptable considering pgAdmin is packaged with PG (Windows version). In that case, you might end up packaging a pgAdmin not supporting PG 7.x which is not yet deprecated. Enjoy your weekend, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Computing Froggy - Message d'origine De : Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : pgadmin-hackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; pgAdmin Support Envoyé le : Vendredi, 16 Novembre 2007, 13h24mn 00s Objet : [pgadmin-support] Support for older servers Should we consider dropping official support for PostgreSQL 7.x in the next major version of pgAdmin? Thoughts? /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate _ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
