[COMMITTERS] bizgres - bizgres: Tagged version string.

2006-03-24 Thread User Llonergan
Log Message:
---
Tagged version string.

Modified Files:
--
bizgres/postgresql:
configure (r1.1.1.3.2.1 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/configure.diff?r1=1.1.1.3.2.1&r2=1.3)
configure.in (r1.1.1.3.2.1 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/configure.in.diff?r1=1.1.1.3.2.1&r2=1.3)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


[COMMITTERS] bizgres - bizgres: Includes: 1.

2006-03-24 Thread User Aparashar
Log Message:
---
Includes: 
1. Resolution of the copy issues on table that alerady has bitmap index.
2. Query run is fine for Bitmap And.

Jie

Modified Files:
--
bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap:
Makefile (r1.1 -> r1.2)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/Makefile.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2)
bitmap.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmap.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmapattutil.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmapattutil.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmapcompare.c (r1.1 -> r1.2)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmapcompare.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2)
bitmapinsert.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmapinsert.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmappages.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmappages.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmapsearch.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmapsearch.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmaputil.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmaputil.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bitmapxlog.c (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/access/bitmap/bitmapxlog.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/nodes:
ondiskbitmapwords.c (r1.1 -> r1.2)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/backend/nodes/ondiskbitmapwords.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2)
bizgres/postgresql/src/include/access:
bitmap.h (r1.2 -> r1.3)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/include/access/bitmap.h.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3)
bizgres/postgresql/src/include/nodes:
ondiskbitmapwords.h (r1.1 -> r1.2)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/postgresql/src/include/nodes/ondiskbitmapwords.h.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Comments in IndexBuildHeapScan describe the indexing of

2006-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
Log Message:
---
Comments in IndexBuildHeapScan describe the indexing of recently-dead
tuples as needed "to keep VACUUM from complaining", but actually there is
a more compelling reason to do it: failure to do so violates MVCC semantics.
This is because a pre-existing serializable transaction might try to use
the index after we finish (re)building it, and it might fail to find tuples
it should be able to see.  We got this mostly right, but not in the case
of partial indexes: the code mistakenly discarded recently-dead tuples for
partial indexes.  Fix that, and adjust the comments.

Modified Files:
--
pgsql/src/backend/catalog:
index.c (r1.263 -> r1.264)

(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c.diff?r1=1.263&r2=1.264)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[COMMITTERS] pgsql: Comments in IndexBuildHeapScan describe the indexing of

2006-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
Log Message:
---
Comments in IndexBuildHeapScan describe the indexing of recently-dead
tuples as needed "to keep VACUUM from complaining", but actually there is
a more compelling reason to do it: failure to do so violates MVCC semantics.
This is because a pre-existing serializable transaction might try to use
the index after we finish (re)building it, and it might fail to find tuples
it should be able to see.  We got this mostly right, but not in the case
of partial indexes: the code mistakenly discarded recently-dead tuples for
partial indexes.  Fix that, and adjust the comments.

Tags:

REL8_1_STABLE

Modified Files:
--
pgsql/src/backend/catalog:
index.c (r1.261.2.1 -> r1.261.2.2)

(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c.diff?r1=1.261.2.1&r2=1.261.2.2)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[COMMITTERS] bizgres - bizgres: Introduce release Release-0_9_0

2006-03-24 Thread User Ksrikanth
Log Message:
---
Introduce release Release-0_9_0

Modified Files:
--
bizgres:
release.txt (r1.17 -> r1.18)

(http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/bizgres/bizgres/release.txt.diff?r1=1.17&r2=1.18)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend