Re: [DOCS] ROW or RANGE not optional in range specification

2015-03-31 Thread Tom Lane
David G. Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com writes:
 Either I'm confused about the syntax description rules or the documentation
 for this aspect of window definitions is wrong.

 The expression:

 [ RANGE | ROWS ]  BETWEEN frame_start AND frame_end

 means that the specification of range or rows is optional - but that
 doesn't appear to be the case...

 The documentation should read:

 { RANGE | ROWS } BETWEEN frame_start AND frame_end

Yup, you're right.  Thanks for spotting that!

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


[DOCS] ROW or RANGE not optional in range specification

2015-03-31 Thread David G. Johnston
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-select.html

Either I'm confused about the syntax description rules or the documentation
for this aspect of window definitions is wrong.

The expression:

[ RANGE | ROWS ]  BETWEEN frame_start AND frame_end

means that the specification of range or rows is optional - but that
doesn't appear to be the case...

The documentation should read:

{ RANGE | ROWS } BETWEEN frame_start AND frame_end

Same goes for the bare frame_start specification preceding the between
version.

The bare version looks funny without tag but ORDER BY idx BETWEEN 5
PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW isn't obviously wrong until you get a syntax
error...

David J.