Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] 7.4.1 release notes
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I have updated the release notes for 7.4.1 and HISTORY as of Dec > > > 14. I will make further adjustments before the 7.4.1 release. > > > > Would you care to put back the correct upgrade instructions that I > > had written there? > > There where? I don't understand where the upgrade instructions were. Please look at the CVS diff in the 7.4 branch. You deleted the instructions how to update the information schema. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] 7.4.1 release notes
BPeter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > I have updated the release notes for 7.4.1 and HISTORY as of Dec > > > > 14. I will make further adjustments before the 7.4.1 release. > > > > > > Would you care to put back the correct upgrade instructions that I > > > had written there? > > > > There where? I don't understand where the upgrade instructions were. > > Please look at the CVS diff in the 7.4 branch. You deleted the > instructions how to update the information schema. Restored. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at > > > the bottom of the developers page. > > > > Why do we need two builds anyway? > > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org was > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new > build to see if errors were introduced. All of this has obviously not been true for a long time, so I repeat my question. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at > > > > the bottom of the developers page. > > > > > > Why do we need two builds anyway? > > > > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org was > > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent > > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new > > build to see if errors were introduced. > > All of this has obviously not been true for a long time, so I repeat my > question. How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files? And just last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits. I still don't trust dynamic content on postgresql.org to work reliably. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
[DOCS] problem with getting return type mismatch from function
Title: Message Hi, I'm having a problem with a function that I'm trying to create. I created a data type that is composed of fields from 2 different tables. When I create SQL functions this seems to work just fine. However, when I try to use this data type in a plpgsql function, I get the error message " return type mismatch in function returning tuple at or near "type_name"". No way is what I created a tuple. We're running PostgreSQL 7.3.2 on Red Hat Linux. Any ideas? Harold A. Jackson DBA NDCO AT&T Wireless Services (425)288-3485 (desk) (425)241-8092 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>
