Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Updated documentation for new sequence binding
Thanks, fixed. --- Michael Paesold wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > pgman wrote: > >> I have marged Tom's description of the new sequence binding with text I > >> was working on. I modified it to follow the existing "we used to do X, > >> now we do Y" pattern in the surrounding entries: > >> > >> http://candle.pha.pa.us/tmp/pgsql/release.html#RELEASE-8-1 > > > > Sorry, this is a better URL: > > > > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/release.html#RELEASE-8-1 > > Btw. I think the header "Add proper sequence function dependencies for > DEFAULT" is in the wrong font, i.e. it's all monospace. > > Best Regards > Michael Paesold > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > >http://archives.postgresql.org > -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability
Bruce wrote: > > I was never all that happy with the WAL chapter, since, as you say, it > > doesn't seem to be a first-class user-level feature. I'd be happy to > > integrate it into another chapter, but I'm not sure where. > > Sure, I am looking for suggestions. My relabeling at least fixes that, > but feel free to move things around and relabel them. FWIW, I agree with Peter. We are supposed to be talking about Server Administration, not architectural properties of the database (reliability, performance, etc.). The proposed move takes things more off-topic. In fact, IMO chapter 26 is already too fat and could provide links to the 'benefits' and 'implementation details' portions (maybe move to VII Internals?). Merlin ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [DOCS] Added documentation about caching, reliability
Merlin Moncure wrote: > Bruce wrote: > > > I was never all that happy with the WAL chapter, since, as you say, > it > > > doesn't seem to be a first-class user-level feature. I'd be happy > to > > > integrate it into another chapter, but I'm not sure where. > > > > Sure, I am looking for suggestions. My relabeling at least fixes > that, > > but feel free to move things around and relabel them. > > FWIW, I agree with Peter. We are supposed to be talking about Server > Administration, not architectural properties of the database > (reliability, performance, etc.). The proposed move takes things more > off-topic. In fact, IMO chapter 26 is already too fat and could provide > links to the 'benefits' and 'implementation details' portions (maybe > move to VII Internals?). I have no problem moving the WAL sections out of administration to somewhere else, and linking to it from the Reliability section. In fact, my new added section is probably the only part of that chapter that _does_ belong in the administration guide. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [email protected] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
