Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] New XML section for documentation

[Peter Eisentraut]

David Fetter wrote:
> I think it's useful to mention what's arriving, what's being worked
> on, and what's not even being contemplated in the long term.

We don't even have a roadmap of any kind, so the last thing we can do is 
put claims of that sort in the documentation.

> Similar troubles apply--on a smaller scale--to the information
> schema, SQL/OLB, SQL/JRT, etc.

The information schema is quite extensively documentated.  If you have 
something to add on OLB and JRT, then let's hear your suggestions.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Re: [DOCS] Replication Documentation

[Robert Treat]

On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go
> and what it should cover?
>

I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools 
page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54

-- 
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org