Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and >> not just a FAQ link. > > Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the > main site will add an air of legitimacy to satisfy PHBs. I've added such a page to the site now, and linked it in from the support section and from the front page. The text is more or less copied directly from the FAQ. Updates to the text are always welcome ;-) I suggest that we remove it from the FAQ, or replace it with a reference to the website, once the site has updated. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
On 3/12/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and >> not just a FAQ link. > > Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the > main site will add an air of legitimacy to satisfy PHBs. I've added such a page to the site now, and linked it in from the support section and from the front page. The text is more or less copied directly from the FAQ. Updates to the text are always welcome ;-) url please? Andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?
On Monday 12 March 2007 17:27, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about
> >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and
> >> not just a FAQ link.
> >
> > Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the
> > main site will add an air of legitimacy to satisfy PHBs.
>
> I've added such a page to the site now, and linked it in from the
> support section and from the front page. The text is more or less copied
> directly from the FAQ. Updates to the text are always welcome ;-)
>
> I suggest that we remove it from the FAQ, or replace it with a reference
> to the website, once the site has updated.
>
I'd suggest we add this into the documentation where it belongs :-)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
