Re: [DOCS] Probably mistake in Arrays docs & proposal for index

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Lane
"Christian Rossow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) I think there is a small mistake in the Arrays docs at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/arrays.html

Yeah, you're right.  Fixed, thanks for spotting it!

> 2) Is it possible to integrate an alphabet into the index site?

No idea...

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [DOCS] [pgsql-www] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?

2007-06-07 Thread David Fetter
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:18:29PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> >> I've just found (via google...) useful (for me) comments:
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/sql-createaggregate.html
> >> -- I mean users comments under primary contents of the page.
> >>
> >> These comments were written for 8.0, but are useful for the
> >> current versions too.  What we have is the situation that reading
> >> docs for 8.2 people don't see these comments -- so this
> >> potentially useful information is lost.  So, in this
> >> implementation the idea of comments for docs becomes weak in
> >> general.
> > 
> > The thing to do in these cases is to move the useful info from the
> > user comments into the main doc text.
> 
> Yeah, that's the idea.  Tom often goes through the comments and puts
> stuff into the docs.  But I'm sure there are a *lot* of other people
> who could help with that as well - read comments, figure out of they
> make sense, and submit a docs patch for the next version!

It occurs to me that we could encourage this by emphasizing on the
interactive docs that user comments are not carried forward
automatically and pointing to a place where people can learn how to
submit such patches if they so desire.

Here is the wording I'd propose to replace the paragraph after "Add Comment":

Please use this form to add your own comments regarding your
experience with particular features of PostgreSQL, clarifications of
the documentation, or hints for other users.  These comments are
not automatically carried into future versions of the documentation.
If you believe your change should carry forward, please consider http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide.html";>patching
the document source SGML and sending those patches to mailto:[email protected]";>psql-docs for inclusion in
the official documentation.  This is a way to participate more in the
PostgreSQL project.

This is not a support forum, and your IP address will be logged.  If
you have a question or need help, please see the http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq/>FAQ, try a mailing http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/";>list, or join us
on IRC.

Submissions containing URLs or other keywords commonly found in spam
comments may be silently discarded.  Please contact the mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">webmaster if you think this
is happening to you in error.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778AIM: dfetter666
  Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [DOCS] [pgsql-www] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?

2007-06-07 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:

> I could help with (yeah, not with reworking comments -- I do not know
> English well :-) )

You could certainly rework comments into changes to the main text and
send them to the pgsql-docs list.  If there are problems with the
grammar, somebody will correct it.  Or maybe they won't, but it doesn't
matter, because the good thing is that the new text will be there.  A
piece of text with a minor grammatical error is better than no text at
all.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"We're here to devour each other alive"(Hobbes)

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [DOCS] [pgsql-www] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrej Ricnik-Bay

On 6/8/07, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


You could certainly rework comments into changes to the main text and
send them to the pgsql-docs list.  If there are problems with the
grammar, somebody will correct it.  Or maybe they won't, but it doesn't
matter, because the good thing is that the new text will be there.  A
piece of text with a minor grammatical error is better than no text at
all.

Amen to that :}  (at least if it's not completely misleading).

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings