[DOCS] Inheritance mention
Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1 didn't reference child tables by default? (In releases before 7.1, ONLY was the default behavior.) The default behavior can be modified by changing the configuration option. I see this mentioned four places in the documentation. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] Inheritance mention
Bruce Momjian escreveu: Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1 didn't reference child tables by default? No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported releases from documentation. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] Inheritance mention
Euler Taveira de Oliveira writes: > Bruce Momjian escreveu: >> Do people feel we should continue documenting that Postgres pre-7.1 >> didn't reference child tables by default? >> > No. IMHO we should remove references to unsupported releases from > documentation. "Unsupported releases" is far too strict a criterion for this. For example, there are demonstrably still people using 7.2 (we had a question about it just last week). They will still appreciate these notes when they get around to updating. Pre-7.1 might indeed be old enough to cut, but how much are we really saving? Four sentences out of our current docs doesn't excite me ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
