Re: [DOCS] ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
On 2010/09/28 14:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Excerpts from Satoshi Nagayasu's message of mar sep 28 00:06:19 -0400 2010: On 2010/09/28 12:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Looking at this patch I cannot but wonder if this should be a table instead of a plain list. What's happen if you run the patch command at top of the repository? Sorry, I didn't try applying it. I don't think there's anything wrong with the patch per se. I'm just saying that maybe this page needs more significant SGML markup hacking. I see. Yes, at first, I thought it, too. However, at this time, I think SGML hack is not necessary right now, because the important thing is to fix several missing definitions, So, I want to hear from others on this issue before starting SGML hack (such as "create a table instead of a list"). If markup hack is necessary for this time, I'm ready to go. Thanks, -- NAGAYASU Satoshi -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post)
On 2010/09/26 23:32, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On fre, 2010-07-30 at 01:23 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest) by some developers who are interested in this doc. I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period, and it can be an effective way to merge this large change if we can take time for such intensive work. Is this possible? Any suggestions? If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you changed. Patch is available at here: http://code.google.com/p/ecpgdocs/downloads/detail?name=ecpg-patches.20100928.tgz (I uploaded this to the GoogleCode, because this list did not deliver my previous message with a patch tarball.) The patch is split into total 15 patches for each chapter of the ecpg doc, and every patch could be applied to the Git version with only itself. So you can review every patch chapter by chapter. Thanks in advance. Regards, -- NAGAYASU Satoshi -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual
On tis, 2010-09-28 at 02:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith writes: > > I just made a pass through the wiki cleaning up all of the outdated CVS > > related stuff I knew of there that this page was pointing to. It's a > > sequential group of 9 changes to revert if we're forsaken and somehow > > this conversion stops. Main thing left with obsolete info is > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/cvs.html > > Hrm, that page shouldn't even exist anymore. Peter? I've changed the doc build to use rsync so that orphaned files get deleted. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
[DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab
Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) Just now I pulled from git.postgresql.org, and built the 9.0 and 9.1 A4 PDFs: these are both OK (have the bookmarks tab). (The 8.4.4 A4 PDF on the site is OK too) ISTM this is worth fixing; without bookmark-tabs the PDFs are much less accessible. Erik Rijkers -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab
"Erik Rijkers" wrote: > Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 > PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm > reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) Odd. From this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ With Okular Version 0.9.2 the 9.0 US PDF has a working Bookmarks tab, as well as the Thumbnail and Reviews tabs, but the Contents tab is disabled. (It works with the 8.4 US PDF.) Perhaps it has something to do with the filtering to reduce the file size; it may have had some unexpected side effects. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
[DOCS] pg_archivecleanup doc: changed -d output (doc)
A small formatting change in pg_archivecleanup -d (debug) was committed a few weeks/months ago. The attached patch reflects that change in the documentation. Erik Rijkers doc-pg_archivecleanup.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab
On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner wrote: > "Erik Rijkers" wrote: > >> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 >> PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm >> reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) > > Odd. From this page: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ > > With Okular Version 0.9.2 the 9.0 US PDF has a working Bookmarks > tab, as well as the Thumbnail and Reviews tabs, but the Contents tab > is disabled. (It works with the 8.4 US PDF.) > > Perhaps it has something to do with the filtering to reduce the file > size; it may have had some unexpected side effects. Yes the JPDFTweak process may have stripped that out. :S I can confirm the issue :/ -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab
On 28 September 2010 15:36, Thom Brown wrote: > On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner > wrote: >> "Erik Rijkers" wrote: >> >>> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 >>> PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm >>> reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) >> >> Odd. From this page: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ >> >> With Okular Version 0.9.2 the 9.0 US PDF has a working Bookmarks >> tab, as well as the Thumbnail and Reviews tabs, but the Contents tab >> is disabled. (It works with the 8.4 US PDF.) >> >> Perhaps it has something to do with the filtering to reduce the file >> size; it may have had some unexpected side effects. > > Yes the JPDFTweak process may have stripped that out. :S I can > confirm the issue :/ Just experimented, and found that even if you tell it to use "pdfmarks" (using -om), the bookmarks are still lost, so not sure that option will help. I could only get the bookmarks back if I exported the bookmarks and re-imported them: java -jar jpdftweak.jar -i inputfile.pdf -savebookmarks bookmarks.csv java -jar jpdftweak.jar -i inputfile.pdf -os -loadbookmarks bookmarks.csv -o outputfile.pdf -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab
On 28 September 2010 16:29, Thom Brown wrote: > On 28 September 2010 15:36, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner >> wrote: >>> "Erik Rijkers" wrote: >>> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) >>> >>> Odd. From this page: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ >>> >>> With Okular Version 0.9.2 the 9.0 US PDF has a working Bookmarks >>> tab, as well as the Thumbnail and Reviews tabs, but the Contents tab >>> is disabled. (It works with the 8.4 US PDF.) >>> >>> Perhaps it has something to do with the filtering to reduce the file >>> size; it may have had some unexpected side effects. >> >> Yes the JPDFTweak process may have stripped that out. :S I can >> confirm the issue :/ > > Just experimented, and found that even if you tell it to use > "pdfmarks" (using -om), the bookmarks are still lost, so not sure that > option will help. I could only get the bookmarks back if I exported > the bookmarks and re-imported them: > > java -jar jpdftweak.jar -i inputfile.pdf -savebookmarks bookmarks.csv > java -jar jpdftweak.jar -i inputfile.pdf -os -loadbookmarks > bookmarks.csv -o outputfile.pdf ...and the output file is about 10% larger than the normal optimised file. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
