On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Leslie S Satenstein
wrote:
>
> Hi Robert, I am not familiar with your patch process. However, I can copy
> and paste the offending lines in the PDF file, to a word or openoffice
> document, and use green for insert and red text for delete. As well as
> identifying the page.
>
> Some text, if rephrased, makes the meaning more clear. Some text has missing
> nouns and where several nouns preceed a pronoun, it causes a delay as one
> analyzes the sentence to extract the author's meaning.
>
> If there is a better way, please advise me.
Please keep replies on-list, and write your replies beneath the quoted
text rather than above it.
To submit a patch, you need to check out the source code, edit the
SGML documentation, and then use git diff. See:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch
In short:
git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
git diff > grammar.patch
If you have only a handful of changes, feel free to just point out the
parts that you think could be phrased better and how you think they
should be written, rather than generating a patch. Actually, it'd
probably be better to point out the first few changes that way anyhow,
to see if we agree with your opinions on what should be done. If
you're submitting a large number of edits, you're going to have to
learn how to generate a patch file as per the above, because otherwise
it's going to be extremely laborious for anyone to think about
applying your changes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
