[DOCS] This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
I started to read the pdf file for version 9.0.2, since it is a document that I can peruse without being on the web. I found some text that, to my mind, did not read well. I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would be my perceptions. I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a lot of work. What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as well as feedback. -- Regards Leslie Mr. Leslie Satenstein (I am a "he Leslie") -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Re: [DOCS] This Newbie is looking at pdf documentation
On lör, 2010-12-25 at 06:33 -0800, Leslie S Satenstein wrote: > I could post in this email, some before after changes, but those would > be my perceptions. I was shown to use GIT with SGL but I am reviewing > the PDF, and therefore the determination of the corresponding SGL is a > lot of work. Perhaps you can think of some other way to mark changes in a PDF document that someone else can then review and process further, keeping in mind that most of us like to work with open-source tools. > What I was after was a to be advised how to arrange peer review of > some changes that I felt were touchups to the documentation. How to > identify these peers and to get my recommended touchups to them, as > well as feedback. This mailing list is your peer. :-) Send your things here. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
