Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions'

2013-07-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Daniel Farina  wrote:
> I had a report from a user asking how they could VACUUM in the future
> under 9.3, when it's no longer supported (which took me aback).  He
> referred me to a manual page:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-vacuum.html
>
> I realized, then, that the problem is the wordsmithing of:
>
> "This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Unsupported
> versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / 7.1 / devel"
>
> An entirely reasonable person would decide that the VACUUM command is
> unsupported in any of the itemized versions.

Strictly speaking, *everything in 9.3 is unsupported. Because it
hasn't been released yet.

But I can understand the confusion - do you have a suggestion for how
to write it to make it more obvious what the actual problem is?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions'

2013-07-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 7/12/13 6:28 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> "This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Unsupported
>> versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / 7.1 / devel"

"This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Devel: 9.3 |
EOL: 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / 7.1"

Although EOL is very much jargon.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions'

2013-07-12 Thread Daniel Farina
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Magnus Hagander  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Daniel Farina  wrote:
> > I had a report from a user asking how they could VACUUM in the future
> > under 9.3, when it's no longer supported (which took me aback).  He
> > referred me to a manual page:
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-vacuum.html
> >
> > I realized, then, that the problem is the wordsmithing of:
> >
> > "This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Unsupported
> > versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / 7.1 / devel"
> >
> > An entirely reasonable person would decide that the VACUUM command is
> > unsupported in any of the itemized versions.
>
> Strictly speaking, *everything in 9.3 is unsupported. Because it
> hasn't been released yet.
>
> But I can understand the confusion - do you have a suggestion for how
> to write it to make it more obvious what the actual problem is?

I don't think I communicated the problem right.  Or maybe I did, but I
can't tell from the response.  So, forgive me for hashing it again in
another way.

The problem is the thinking process goes like this:

I'm sitting on a page about VACUUM, and here's a bit of text itemizing
what versions VACUUM exists in.  But here's a bit of text saying that
VACUUM isn't supported (read to mean: non-existent) in [7.1,8.3] +
9.3.  The thing the user was being led to believe was that VACUUM was
undergoing deprecation.

In other words, he chose to tighter-bind the supported/unsupported to
the topic of the page, rather than the status of the entire release.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions'

2013-07-12 Thread Tom Lane
Daniel Farina  writes:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Magnus Hagander  wrote:
>> But I can understand the confusion - do you have a suggestion for how
>> to write it to make it more obvious what the actual problem is?

> I don't think I communicated the problem right.

Yeah, you did, but we need a concrete suggestion as to how to improve
the wording.

I wonder if just adding "in" would help:

This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  In unsupported versions: 
9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / devel

Another possibility is to replace "unsupported" with something more
explicit:

This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Unreleased or obsolete 
versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / devel

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of `unsupported versions`

2013-07-12 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160


> "This page in other versions: 9.2 / 9.1 / 9.0 / 8.4  |  Unsupported
> versions: 9.3 / 8.3 / 8.2 / 8.1 / 8.0 / 7.4 / 7.3 / 7.2 / 7.1 / devel"
>
> An entirely reasonable person would decide that the VACUUM command is
> unsupported in any of the itemized versions.

How about we simply list all versions, without classifying them as 
unsupported or not? Not sure how useful our scolding^H^Hinforming 
people that 7.4 is old and unsupported is on a page about vacuuming.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com  g...@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation 610-983-9073
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201307122200
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iEYEAREDAAYFAlHgtO8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSshI2wCg1Gt3u8LZ312SRqBH6k9mPAwF
hv8AoMShMaEHUta807dkGLO8H3FOjtey
=BDnQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




-- 
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs


Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of `unsupported versions`

2013-07-12 Thread Michael Nolan
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

>
>
> How about we simply list all versions, without classifying them as
> unsupported or not?
>

Is there an automated mechanism by which a version would move from the
'supported' group to the 'unsupported' group, eg, when 8.4 goes EOL?

Perhaps it would be more clear to first identify what version this page
covers, then provide the equivalent links to other versions, such as:

This page is for PostgreSQL version 9.2
For the equivalent page in other versions see:
Currently Supported Versions:  9.1,  9.0,  8.4
Unreleased or Development versions: 9.3, Devel
Older releases that are no longer being maintained: 8.3, 8.2, 8.1, 8.0

--
Mike Nolan