Re: Unexplained disk usage in AWS Aurora Postgres

2020-08-07 Thread Chris Borckholder
Thank you Adam and Christoph,

You are totally right, that AWS support is the one to help me with this
problem.
I am in contact with them for quite some time on this problem and as there
was no progress on resolving this,
I tried to find some insight or trick that I missed here. It's a long shot
(:

Best Regards
Chris

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:22 PM Christoph Moench-Tegeder 
wrote:

> ## Chris Borckholder (chris.borckhol...@bitpanda.com):
>
> > We are experiencing a strange situation with an AWS Aurora postgres
> > instance.
>
> The main problem here is that "Amazon Aurora" is not PostgreSQL.
> If I understand Amazon's documentation, what you are using is
> officially named "Amazon Aurora with PostgreSQL Compatibility",
> and that sums is up quite nicely: Aurora is a database engine
> developed at Amazon - and it's inner workings are not publically
> documented.
> Whatever is using up that disk space - only AWS Support can know.
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
> --
> Spare Space
>


Re: Unexplained disk usage in AWS Aurora Postgres

2020-08-07 Thread Chris Borckholder
Thanks for your insight!

I cannot find any errors related to archiving in the logs that are
accessible to me.
It's definitely something that I will forward to the support team of the
managed database.

Best Regards
Chris

On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:18 AM Mohamed Wael Khobalatte <
mkhobala...@grubhub.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:39 AM Chris Borckholder <
> chris.borckhol...@bitpanda.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We are experiencing a strange situation with an AWS Aurora postgres
>> instance.
>> The database steadily grows in size, which is expected and normal.
>> After enabling logical replication, the disk usage reported by AWS
>> metrics increases much faster then the database size (as seen by \l+ in
>> psql). The current state is that database size is ~290GB, while AWS reports
>> >640GB disk usage.
>> We reached out to AWS support of course, which is ultimately responsible.
>> Unfortunately they were not able to diagnose this until now.
>>
>> I checked with the queries from wiki
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Disk_Usage , which essentially give the
>> same result.
>> I tried to check on wal segment file size, but we have no permission to
>> execute select pg_ls_waldir().
>> The replication slot is active and it also progresses
>> (pg_replication_slots.confirmed_flush_lsn increases and is close to
>> pg_current_wal_flush_lsn).
>>
>> Can you imagine other things that I could check from within postgres with
>> limited permissions to diagnose this?
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Chris
>>
>>
> If you do archive wal files, maybe the archive_command is failing?
>


Re: Unexplained disk usage in AWS Aurora Postgres

2020-08-07 Thread Chris Borckholder
Thank you for your insight Seenu!

That is a good point, unfortunately we do not have access to the
server/file system as the database is a managed service.
Access to the file system from postgres like pg_ls_dir is also blocked.

Are you aware of another, creative way to infer the wal file size from
within postgres?

Best Regards
Chris

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:39 AM Srinivasa T N  wrote:

> There may be lot of wal files or the size of log files in pg_log might be
> huge.  "du -sh *" of data directory holding the database might help.
>
> Regards,
> Seenu.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:09 PM Chris Borckholder <
> chris.borckhol...@bitpanda.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> We are experiencing a strange situation with an AWS Aurora postgres
>> instance.
>> The database steadily grows in size, which is expected and normal.
>> After enabling logical replication, the disk usage reported by AWS
>> metrics increases much faster then the database size (as seen by \l+ in
>> psql). The current state is that database size is ~290GB, while AWS reports
>> >640GB disk usage.
>> We reached out to AWS support of course, which is ultimately responsible.
>> Unfortunately they were not able to diagnose this until now.
>>
>> I checked with the queries from wiki
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Disk_Usage , which essentially give the
>> same result.
>> I tried to check on wal segment file size, but we have no permission to
>> execute select pg_ls_waldir().
>> The replication slot is active and it also progresses
>> (pg_replication_slots.confirmed_flush_lsn increases and is close to
>> pg_current_wal_flush_lsn).
>>
>> Can you imagine other things that I could check from within postgres with
>> limited permissions to diagnose this?
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>


Unexplained disk usage in AWS Aurora Postgres

2020-08-04 Thread Chris Borckholder
Hi!

We are experiencing a strange situation with an AWS Aurora postgres
instance.
The database steadily grows in size, which is expected and normal.
After enabling logical replication, the disk usage reported by AWS metrics
increases much faster then the database size (as seen by \l+ in psql). The
current state is that database size is ~290GB, while AWS reports >640GB
disk usage.
We reached out to AWS support of course, which is ultimately responsible.
Unfortunately they were not able to diagnose this until now.

I checked with the queries from wiki
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Disk_Usage , which essentially give the
same result.
I tried to check on wal segment file size, but we have no permission to
execute select pg_ls_waldir().
The replication slot is active and it also progresses
(pg_replication_slots.confirmed_flush_lsn increases and is close to
pg_current_wal_flush_lsn).

Can you imagine other things that I could check from within postgres with
limited permissions to diagnose this?

Best Regards
Chris