Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

2023-01-21 Thread Adrian Klaver

On 1/21/23 07:58, Marc wrote:

This is a test.


Received.


Apologies but 19/12 we are no longer receiving the list mails





--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com





Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

2023-01-21 Thread Marc
This is a test.

Apologies but 19/12 we are no longer receiving the list mails





Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

2022-12-19 Thread Thomas Boussekey
Hi,

Le lun. 19 déc. 2022 à 07:12, Inzamam Shafiq  a
écrit :

> Thanks Thomas for the response,
>
> It means if I run VACUUM ANALYZE on pg_attribute or pg_class table, it is
> completely safe? Can you please also please confirm what is meant by
> "mid-level" vacuum?
>

To clarify my last message, VACUUM ANALYZE is a trade-off between
autovacuum, that can be considered as a lazy non-blocking operation, and
VACUUM FULL (eager & blocking one).
The `mid-level` in my previous mail was used to pinpoint an intermediate
blacking & resource consumption situation.

VACUUM ANALYZE will:
- remove dead tuples definition
- refresh statistics (can improve execution plans for queries)

Have a look at this website, it explains that better than me ;) :
https://www.interdb.jp/pg/pgsql06.html



>
> Regards,
>
> *Inzamam Shafiq*
> *Sr. DBA*
> --
> *From:* Thomas Boussekey 
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 18, 2022 4:01 PM
> *To:* Inzamam Shafiq 
> *Cc:* pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <
> pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Autovacuum on sys tables
>
> Hello Inzamam,
>
> Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 08:16, Inzamam Shafiq 
> a écrit :
>
> Dear Experts,
>
> Hope you are doing well.
>
> I have a question that autovacuum is running on sys tables like pg_class,
> pg_attribute, is it a normal thing? Further, what is dead tuples are not
> removed from Autovacuum, can we remove the dead tuples using FULL VACUUMM
> or pg_repack on sys tables?
>
>
> pg_repack cannot run on system tables, it will FAIL with an explicit error
> message explaining the limitation.
>
> Each time you perform DDL operations (CREATE, DROP, ALTER), rows are
> inserted/updated or deleted into the system tables : pg_class, pg_attribute
> ...
> Autovacuum operations perform "low-level" operations, it can be
> interesting to perform "middle-level" vacuum with VACUUM ANALYZE... that is
> not blocking, but will be more a resource-consuming operation than
> autovacuum.
>
> Performing VACUUM FULL operation will block access to these pillar tables
> of your database.
> If your application/users can handle it, go ahead!
> At work on this kind of operation, I set a statement_timeout, in order to
> properly stop the process if it is over a defined amount of time.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Thomas
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Inzamam Shafiq*
> *Sr. DBA*
>
>


Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

2022-12-18 Thread Inzamam Shafiq
Thanks Thomas for the response,

It means if I run VACUUM ANALYZE on pg_attribute or pg_class table, it is 
completely safe? Can you please also please confirm what is meant by 
"mid-level" vacuum?

Regards,

Inzamam Shafiq
Sr. DBA

From: Thomas Boussekey 
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2022 4:01 PM
To: Inzamam Shafiq 
Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org 
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

Hello Inzamam,

Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 08:16, Inzamam Shafiq 
mailto:inzamam.sha...@hotmail.com>> a écrit :
Dear Experts,

Hope you are doing well.

I have a question that autovacuum is running on sys tables like pg_class, 
pg_attribute, is it a normal thing? Further, what is dead tuples are not 
removed from Autovacuum, can we remove the dead tuples using FULL VACUUMM or 
pg_repack on sys tables?

pg_repack cannot run on system tables, it will FAIL with an explicit error 
message explaining the limitation.

Each time you perform DDL operations (CREATE, DROP, ALTER), rows are 
inserted/updated or deleted into the system tables : pg_class, pg_attribute ...
Autovacuum operations perform "low-level" operations, it can be interesting to 
perform "middle-level" vacuum with VACUUM ANALYZE... that is not blocking, but 
will be more a resource-consuming operation than autovacuum.

Performing VACUUM FULL operation will block access to these pillar tables of 
your database.
If your application/users can handle it, go ahead!
At work on this kind of operation, I set a statement_timeout, in order to 
properly stop the process if it is over a defined amount of time.

Hope this helps,
Thomas

Thank you.

Regards,

Inzamam Shafiq
Sr. DBA


Re: Autovacuum on sys tables

2022-12-18 Thread Thomas Boussekey
Hello Inzamam,

Le sam. 17 déc. 2022 à 08:16, Inzamam Shafiq  a
écrit :

> Dear Experts,
>
> Hope you are doing well.
>
> I have a question that autovacuum is running on sys tables like pg_class,
> pg_attribute, is it a normal thing? Further, what is dead tuples are not
> removed from Autovacuum, can we remove the dead tuples using FULL VACUUMM
> or pg_repack on sys tables?
>

pg_repack cannot run on system tables, it will FAIL with an explicit error
message explaining the limitation.

Each time you perform DDL operations (CREATE, DROP, ALTER), rows are
inserted/updated or deleted into the system tables : pg_class, pg_attribute
...
Autovacuum operations perform "low-level" operations, it can be interesting
to perform "middle-level" vacuum with VACUUM ANALYZE... that is not
blocking, but will be more a resource-consuming operation than autovacuum.

Performing VACUUM FULL operation will block access to these pillar tables
of your database.
If your application/users can handle it, go ahead!
At work on this kind of operation, I set a statement_timeout, in order to
properly stop the process if it is over a defined amount of time.

Hope this helps,
Thomas

>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Inzamam Shafiq*
> *Sr. DBA*
>


Autovacuum on sys tables

2022-12-16 Thread Inzamam Shafiq
Dear Experts,

Hope you are doing well.

I have a question that autovacuum is running on sys tables like pg_class, 
pg_attribute, is it a normal thing? Further, what is dead tuples are not 
removed from Autovacuum, can we remove the dead tuples using FULL VACUUMM or 
pg_repack on sys tables?

Thank you.

Regards,

Inzamam Shafiq
Sr. DBA