Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

[Kyotaro HORIGUCHI]

At Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:32:19 +, Gaetano Mendola  wrote 
in 
> I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option.
> 
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall  wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
> > > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.
> > >
> > > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
> > > closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
> > > cause it not to work any more.
> > >
> > > Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
> > > same job done?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Moran 
> >
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect
> > that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it.

As more official statement, this page says that it supports PG9.5
as of 1.3.3.

http://pgxn.org/dist/pg_repack/doc/pg_repack.html

> pg_repack 1.3.3
> Added support for PostgreSQL 9.5

Latest version seems 1.3.4.

The requirements on the page looks somewhat stale.

> Requirements
>   PostgreSQL versions
>   PostgreSQL 8.3, 8.4, 9.0, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4


regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center




-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

[Alvaro Herrera]

Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option.

Because nobody has written the patch.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

[Gaetano Mendola]

I wonder why this is not a VACUUM option.

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 15:30 Kenneth Marshall  wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
> > Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.
> >
> > The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
> > closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
> > cause it not to work any more.
> >
> > Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
> > same job done?
> >
> > --
> > Bill Moran 
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect
> that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it.
>
> Regards,
> Ken
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

Re: [GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

[Kenneth Marshall]

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:15:51AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> 
> Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
> Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.
> 
> The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
> closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
> cause it not to work any more.
> 
> Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
> same job done?
> 
> -- 
> Bill Moran 

Hi Bill,

We are currently using it with 9.5.5 and it works well. I would expect
that it would work with 9.6 as well, but we have not tested it.

Regards,
Ken


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

[GENERAL] pg_repack and Postgres versions > 9.4

[Bill Moran]

Does anyone have experience using pg_repack on Postgres versions > 9.4?
Specifically 9.5, but probably 9.6 at some point.

The documentation claims it supports up to 9.4. I haven't looked at it
closely enough to guess whether there might be changes in 9.5/9.6 to
cause it not to work any more.

Anyone know? Or, alternatively, anyone have another option to get the
same job done?

-- 
Bill Moran 


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general