RE: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-11-01 Thread Robert D. Nelson

In general I am pretty pissed at RH attitude to system
upgrade, if I were working in a Production environment,
I would either hire them and not try anything myself,
which kinda contradicts the whole Linux philosophy.

Can this kind of stuff get put on a Red Hat mailing list, rather than sent 
here? Thanks!


Rob Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-11-01 Thread Adam Lang

It also relates back to a post I made many moons ago.  I don't upgrade any
OS (outside of minor patches).  If it is a new OS version, backup and then
clean install.  Just too many variables to contend with to trust a type of
upgrade script.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Wolfe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0


  I was the original poster. Really my confusion stemmed
  from the fact that upgrading from RH6.0 to RH7.0, 7.0
  complained (during boot) that my Postgress verision was outdated
  I need to upgrade. This threw me off.

   Yeah, the init script that they provide checks what's in PG_VERSION, and
 tells you to upgrade.  The bad side is that it may have already
overwritten
 your old binaries, etc., making it difficult to do a dump.  You'd have to
 reinstall the old one, do the dump, then upgrade PostgreSQL, and then
 reinsert.

Hopefully, their upgrade system was smart enough to not blindly
overwrite
 your old PostgreSQL installation.  If it did blindy overwrite it, then
it's
 a very poorly written "upgrade", even Microsoft does better than that in a
 lot of situations.  It would give further validation to my refusal to ever
 use RedHat's upgrade procedure.

This isn't to say that RedHat is the devil.  Just that like all *nix
 varieties, it has it's own behavioural deficiencies that need to be
 recognized and worked around.  If there was a *nix that didn't have
 deficiencies, then all of the other varieties would quickly go away.

  In general I am pretty pissed at RH attitude to system
  upgrade, if I were working in a Production environment,
  I would either hire them and not try anything myself,
  which kinda contradicts the whole Linux philosophy.

Well, it certainly doesn't contradict the RedHat philosophy of "Give
them
 the product for free, then charge for support." ; )





Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-11-01 Thread Adam Lang

I wouldn't say ditch out on Redhat because of Postgres upgrades.  As was
mentioned on the list before, there is no current silver bullet upgrade for
postgres. Dump, install new version, import old data.  I would assume then
that means SUSE would be no better on that regard either.

Also, any bad experiences I have had with Redhat are not with Redhat
themselves, per se.  Mainly with RPMs.  They really just don't mix well with
applications you compile...  OK, and maybe the occasional wierd directory
structure that goes on, but other than that, I still choose them over other
distributions.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
- Original Message -
From: "os390 ibmos" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0



 Exactly my point. My next Linux server that I build is going
 to be SUSE, atleast some guys are not in a hurry to go public.

 From: "Steve Wolfe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Well, it certainly doesn't contradict the RedHat philosophy of "Give
 them
 the product for free, then charge for support." ; )
 
 

 _
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
 http://profiles.msn.com.




Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-11-01 Thread Lamar Owen

"Robert D. Nelson" wrote:
 
 In general I am pretty pissed at RH attitude to system
 upgrade, if I were working in a Production environment,
 I would either hire them and not try anything myself,
 which kinda contradicts the whole Linux philosophy.

 Can this kind of stuff get put on a Red Hat mailing list, rather than sent
 here? Thanks!

pgsql-ports for PostgreSQL related stuff.  I will announce soon some
exciting news related to the RPM's, as well as a dedicated
'postgresqlrpms' mailing list, and the RPM spec files, patches, etc,
under a public CVS server.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-31 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød

"Adam Lang" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 But it don't help if you downloaded the OS. ;)

You can of course find it on the ftp site as well, in the RPMS directory.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.



Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-31 Thread Lamar Owen

Adam Lang wrote:
 
 But it don't help if you downloaded the OS. ;)

If you downloaded the RedHat CD ISO images, OR the ftp dirs, you got the
postgresql RPM's, unless you specifically excluded them.

And you can certainly get them from RedHat's ftp site, as busy as it is.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-31 Thread Adam Lang

Yeah I know.  I mentioned the redhat website when I first replied to the
post.

Which leads me to a question.  Why do so many people ask the list where the
most current RPMS for Redhat are located?  Not trying to start trouble, but
doesn't it seem obvious to check the Redhat site?  Just wierd that so many
people ask where to find them...

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
- Original Message -
From: "Lamar Owen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Adam Lang" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0


 Adam Lang wrote:
 
  But it don't help if you downloaded the OS. ;)

 If you downloaded the RedHat CD ISO images, OR the ftp dirs, you got the
 postgresql RPM's, unless you specifically excluded them.

 And you can certainly get them from RedHat's ftp site, as busy as it is.
 --
 Lamar Owen
 WGCR Internet Radio
 1 Peter 4:11




Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-31 Thread Lamar Owen

Adam Lang wrote:
 Which leads me to a question.  Why do so many people ask the list where the
 most current RPMS for Redhat are located?  Not trying to start trouble, but
 doesn't it seem obvious to check the Redhat site?  Just wierd that so many
 people ask where to find them...

Well, we maintain RPM's ourselves (or should I say, I maintain RPM's
myself) -- but due to the lack of a RedHat 7 machine for me to build on
(at this time) the best place to get RedHat 7 RPM's is with RedHat 7.

I just announced the newest set -- there will be more announcements
later this week or early next week as I build binaries on other
architectures (I'm even working on building Hercules so I can
build/rebuild for S/390 on my Intel box -- Hercules is an ESA/390
emulator -- slow as Christmas, but will run Linux/390 well enough to
build/rebuild RPM's.  My goal is posting working S/390 binaries on
ftp.postgresql.org -- the coolness factor alone is worth the work) and
other distributions (such as TurboLinux, Caldera eServer, and SuSE --
although SuSE has a 7.0.2 RPMset of their own that is substantially
different from ours, even though it is based on ours).

Unless someone want to offer me a shell and build privileges on a
Linux/390 VM on their real S/390 :-).

In fact, I'm requesting that people running something other than RedHat
6.2 on Intel try to --rebuild the src.rpm I just posted so that I can
get binaries for multiple architectures.  If you need to patch the spec
file or whatever else to get it to run, send the patches my way so we
can make it just a simple --rebuild for most folks.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11



Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-31 Thread os390 ibmos




I was the original poster. Really my confusion stemmed
from the fact that upgrading from RH6.0 to RH7.0, 7.0
complained (during boot) that my Postgress verision was outdated
I need to upgrade. This threw me off.

In general I am pretty pissed at RH attitude to system
upgrade, if I were working in a Production environment,
I would either hire them and not try anything myself,
which kinda contradicts the whole Linux philosophy.


Yeah I know.  I mentioned the redhat website when I first replied to the
post.

Which leads me to a question.  Why do so many people ask the list where the
most current RPMS for Redhat are located?  Not trying to start trouble, but
doesn't it seem obvious to check the Redhat site?  Just wierd that so many
people ask where to find them...

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
- Original Message -
From: "Lamar Owen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Adam Lang" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0


  Adam Lang wrote:
  
   But it don't help if you downloaded the OS. ;)
 
  If you downloaded the RedHat CD ISO images, OR the ftp dirs, you got the
  postgresql RPM's, unless you specifically excluded them.
 
  And you can certainly get them from RedHat's ftp site, as busy as it is.
  --
  Lamar Owen
  WGCR Internet Radio
  1 Peter 4:11


_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




[GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0

2000-10-30 Thread os390 ibmos

I am upgrading from RH 6.0 to RH 7.0.

Dos anybody know where I can find the rpms for Postgres
to work on RH7.0.

Thanks,
===
arijit
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.