Re: [GENERAL] Function Returning SETOF RECORD: Trouble With Char Type

2008-03-20 Thread Angus B. Atkins-Trimnell
Thanks a lot.  I missed your post when it first came up, but I just 
tried double-quoting the type indicator and it worked like a charm!


--Angus

Tom Lane wrote:

"Angus B. Atkins-Trimnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
  
I am having trouble with a function designed to return all column 
constraints on a table.



I think the problem is that you're declaring the contype return column
as char (ie, character(1)) when pg_constraint.contype is actually "char"
(a historical PG datatype that's really just a single byte).  The naming
confusion is unfortunate but we've never bitten the bullet to rename
"char" to something else.

Use quotes, or explicitly cast the catalog column to regular char
in the function's query.

regards, tom lane


  


Re: [GENERAL] Function Returning SETOF RECORD: Trouble With Char Type

2008-03-12 Thread Tom Lane
"Angus B. Atkins-Trimnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am having trouble with a function designed to return all column 
> constraints on a table.

I think the problem is that you're declaring the contype return column
as char (ie, character(1)) when pg_constraint.contype is actually "char"
(a historical PG datatype that's really just a single byte).  The naming
confusion is unfortunate but we've never bitten the bullet to rename
"char" to something else.

Use quotes, or explicitly cast the catalog column to regular char
in the function's query.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general