Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Knew I should have taken time to review that patch before it went in ...
> Which one? The one I applied doesn't have this change.
Never mind --- I misunderstood the context of the discussion and thought
you had made larger changes in the last version of the patch than I was
expecting ...
The patch as committed looks fine to me, modulo a couple of comments
which I've fixed.
One thing that slightly troubles me is that GetOldestXmin will now
ignore a lazy vacuum's *own* xmin, which is not like the previous
behavior. Offhand I can't see a reason why this is not safe, but
maybe it'd have been better for it to do
+ if (ignoreVacuum && proc->inVacuum && proc != MyProc)
+ continue;
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
