Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: All, http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. Sorry, that was meant to be posted to pgsql-advocacy. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
On 07/03/16 23:32, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: All, http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. Yes but: 1. MSSQL is not going to magically run well on Linux. It was never designed to run on a *NIX platform and it long left the parts that would (Sybase) in the dust. I'd be surprised if it would *not* run well on Linux. Linux is an easy platform to develop, it's fast and reliable and they have plenty of time (till release). 2. This is actually good for us. It validates our primary deployment platform. Why run a closed source MSSQL when you can get Open Source PostgreSQL on the same platform major platform? SQL Server seems to have some nice features that PostgreSQL don't have. Encryption support and Hekaton (columnar-store "shared buffers") come to my mind. It's definitely not a toy database, even less on Linux. 3. Competition is good when we have it, our community steps up. Absolutely, competition is very welcome! Álvaro -- Álvaro Hernández Tortosa --- 8Kdata -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
Microsoft is only trying to raise some awareness for their new ASP.NET 5 multi-platform, which works closely with MSSQL. I don't believe they are honestly interested in the *NIX user. They extend their userbase in the hope to get them onto Azure. -Original Message- From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake Sent: maandag 7 maart 2016 23:32 To: Josh berkus <j...@agliodbs.com>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft? On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: > All, > > http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 > > Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people > using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're > picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. > Yes but: 1. MSSQL is not going to magically run well on Linux. It was never designed to run on a *NIX platform and it long left the parts that would (Sybase) in the dust. 2. This is actually good for us. It validates our primary deployment platform. Why run a closed source MSSQL when you can get Open Source PostgreSQL on the same platform major platform? 3. Competition is good when we have it, our community steps up. -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
On 03/07/2016 02:26 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: >> On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: >>> http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 >>> >>> Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people >>> using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're >>> picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. >> >> IANAL, but I wonder how they can have R support given that libR.so is >> GPL licensed, not LPGL? Have they open sourced SQL Server? > > I thought they had purchased/partnered with an R implementor that didn't > use the GPL one... Microsoft bought Revolution R, but that implementation is still GPL -- it has to be because it is derived from the open source R project which is GPL. Anyway, shouldn't we move this to advocacy? Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: All, http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. Yes but: 1. MSSQL is not going to magically run well on Linux. It was never designed to run on a *NIX platform and it long left the parts that would (Sybase) in the dust. 2. This is actually good for us. It validates our primary deployment platform. Why run a closed source MSSQL when you can get Open Source PostgreSQL on the same platform major platform? 3. Competition is good when we have it, our community steps up. -- Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564 PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development. Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
* Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: > On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: > > http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 > > > > Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people > > using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're > > picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. > > IANAL, but I wonder how they can have R support given that libR.so is > GPL licensed, not LPGL? Have they open sourced SQL Server? I thought they had purchased/partnered with an R implementor that didn't use the GPL one... Thanks! Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
On 03/07/2016 01:43 PM, Josh berkus wrote: > http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 > > Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people > using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're > picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. IANAL, but I wonder how they can have R support given that libR.so is GPL licensed, not LPGL? Have they open sourced SQL Server? ;-P -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[HACKERS] New competition from Microsoft?
All, http://blogs.microsoft.com/?p=67248 Once SQL Server is available on Linux, we're going to see more people using it as an alternative to PostgreSQL. Especially since they're picking up a lot of our better features, like R support. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
