Re: [HACKERS] SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Simon, On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 at 08:23, Simon Riggs wrote: Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported platforms list? (still) ...is it because Reinhard seems resistant why do you think so? (after private conversation) to the idea of submitting a formal port report via HACKERS, like everybody else? I andwered you that I will do it, but last week was a short week for me, and this Monday I had an email from Peter Eisentraut telling me that he will add the SUSE ports to the list, so I didn't see a need to send a report in addition. cu Reinhard ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[HACKERS] SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported platforms list? (still) ...is it because Reinhard seems resistant (after private conversation) to the idea of submitting a formal port report via HACKERS, like everybody else? ...or is it because his postings to ANNOUNCE that the port to SUSE have gone unnoticed by those that compile the supported platforms list? ...or both? There seems no reason for either to occur, but still - no port listed. Please list the SUSE port, as reported by Reinhard Max. Please can Reinhard (or another SUSE rep) submit port reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best Regards, Simon Riggs On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 16:15 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Due to several small, and one fairly large, bugs that were found in Release Candidate 4, we have been forced to release our 5th Release (and hopefully last) Candidate so that we can get some proper testing in on the changes before release. A current list of *known* supported platforms can be found at: http://developer.postgresql.org/supported-platforms.html We're always looking to improve that list, so we encourage anyone that is running a platform not listed to please report on any success or failures with Release Candidate 4. Baring *any* coding changes (documentation != code) over the next week or so, we *hope* that this will the final Release Candidate before Full Release, with that being aimed for the 19th of January. As always, this release is available on all mirrors, as listed at: http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/download/mirrors-ftp For those using Bittorrent, David Fetter has updated the .torrents, available at: http://bt.postgresql.org Please report any bug reports with this Release Candidate to: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported platforms list? (still) I haven't seen any reports of passes on SUSE. I have zero doubt that PG works on SUSE, since it's pretty much exactly like every other Linux, but there's been no specific reports on the lists AFAIR. ...is it because Reinhard seems resistant (after private conversation) to the idea of submitting a formal port report via HACKERS, like everybody else? See above. ...or is it because his postings to ANNOUNCE that the port to SUSE have gone unnoticed by those that compile the supported platforms list? If he insists on posting such routine stuff to pgsql-announce, he should not be too surprised that his postings do not get approved. That isn't the correct forum. We don't peruse the New York Times classified ads for such reports, either ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: Re: [HACKERS] SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Reinhard Max max@suse.de wrote on 12.01.2005, 11:38:55: On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 at 03:53, Tom Lane wrote: ...or is it because his postings to ANNOUNCE that the port to SUSE have gone unnoticed by those that compile the supported platforms list? If he insists on posting such routine stuff to pgsql-announce, he should not be too surprised that his postings do not get approved. That isn't the correct forum. We don't peruse the New York Times classified ads for such reports, either ... no need to be rude to me for posting one single email to ANNOUNCE after years of providing the SUSE RPMs silently. There were other posts about RPM builds on ANNOUNCE, so I thought it would be the right place to announce mine as well. Please no more. I started this, so I apologise now to both of you, and to the list and hope this ends here. We all look forward to SUSE being a listed port. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
Simon Riggs wrote: Not sure what is going on here: why is SUSE not listed on the supported platforms list? (still) RC5 contains: SUSE Linux x86 8.0.0 Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), 2005-01-10 9.1 In the meantime I have received confirmation from Reinhard Max that his test methods match our requirements, so the list will be completed with the other platforms he reported in due time. I'm sorry, but I won't just add it works notices if it's not clear what kind of testing was done. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
