Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
 Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
 several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
 accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
 -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.

I'm confused why we need ANY of these.  What problem are we solving
that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve?  We could
doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
something that has value.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Robert Haas escribió:
 On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
  Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
  several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
  accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
  -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
 
 I'm confused why we need ANY of these.  What problem are we solving
 that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve?  We could
 doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
 plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
 something that has value.

You know what I think would have some value?  An output style that emits
DocBook markup for tables, something which we could paste on the docs.
(I already use the LaTeX mode to paste in presentation slides.)

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
 Robert Haas escribió:
 On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
  Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
  several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
  accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
  -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.

 I'm confused why we need ANY of these.  What problem are we solving
 that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve?  We could
 doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
 plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
 something that has value.

 You know what I think would have some value?  An output style that emits
 DocBook markup for tables, something which we could paste on the docs.
 (I already use the LaTeX mode to paste in presentation slides.)

Sure.  I have never personally wanted that, but I see the value of it:
it makes something that's probably annoying to do right now simple.
That's a functional enhancement; this is not.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 16:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
 wrote:
  Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive,
 but
  several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason
 to
  accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
  -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
 
 I'm confused why we need ANY of these.

I'm not actually in favor of adding any of these.  I was just trying to
say that any but the ones I mentioned I don't consider acceptable at
all.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 18:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 An output style that emits
 DocBook markup for tables, something which we could paste on the docs.

DocBook supports HTML tables from version 4.3 on.  We currently use
version 4.2, but we could presumably raise that if needed.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/28 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com

 On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
  Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
  several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
  accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
  -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.

 I'm confused why we need ANY of these.  What problem are we solving
 that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve?  We could
 doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
 plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
 something that has value.


It has primary aesthetic value - not much more (similar value has original
unicode border)

With this patch you can prepare a little bit nicer (plain text) reports
without using special software. And a implementation is really simply - so
it offer sympathetic benefit without any cost.

Regards

Pavel



 --
 Robert Haas
 EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
 The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-28 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/28 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com

 Robert Haas escribió:
  On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net
 wrote:
   Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
   several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
   accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
   -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.
 
  I'm confused why we need ANY of these.  What problem are we solving
  that the existing unicode style doesn't already solve?  We could
  doubtless invent an infinite or at least very large number of
  plausible ways to border psql output, but I don't see that as
  something that has value.

 You know what I think would have some value?  An output style that emits
 DocBook markup for tables, something which we could paste on the docs.
 (I already use the LaTeX mode to paste in presentation slides.)


Although it sounds crazy - some unicode-doubleX looks well (although it is
subjective) and I use it in presentation (and wiki) too - just copy/paste.

Nothing against DocBook support  (or any modern markdown (mediawiki, ..)
formats).

Pavel


 --
 Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-27 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/26 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com




 2013/11/26 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

 On 11/22/13, 3:26 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
  website is related to patch for 9.3 (I add note there)
 
  patch for 9.4 is fixed - and now with small doc

 I think it would help if we considered the new border styles and the new
 line styles separately.

 I don't find the new border styles to be particularly useful.  They just
 use up vertical screen space, which is usually more precious than
 vertical space.  Is there a situation where you would find these styles
 to be more useful than the existing ones?  Keep in mind that pset is
 usually set permanently, so it wouldn't be practical to use a different
 border style depending on how the query results shape up (like \x auto).

 Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
 several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
 accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
 -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.


I am sending reduced patch

I add a double1, double4 and double5 - renamed to double1,double2, double3

support for border 3 and 4 removed

postgres=# \pset linestyle double1 \pset border 2 \l
Line style (linestyle) is double1.
Border style (border) is 2.
   List of databases
┌───┬──┬──┬─┬─┬───┐
│   Name│  Owner   │ Encoding │   Collate   │Ctype│   Access
privileges   │
╞═══╪══╪══╪═╪═╪═══╡
│ postgres  │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8
│   │
│ template0 │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │
=c/postgres   │
│   │  │  │ │ │
postgres=CTc/postgres │
│ template1 │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │
=c/postgres   │
│   │  │  │ │ │
postgres=CTc/postgres │
└───┴──┴──┴─┴─┴───┘
(3 rows)

postgres=# \pset linestyle double2 \pset border 2 \l
Line style (linestyle) is double2.
Border style (border) is 2.
   List of databases
╔═══╤══╤══╤═╤═╤═══╗
║   Name│  Owner   │ Encoding │   Collate   │Ctype│   Access
privileges   ║
╟───┼──┼──┼─┼─┼───╢
║ postgres  │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8
│   ║
║ template0 │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │
=c/postgres   ║
║   │  │  │ │ │
postgres=CTc/postgres ║
║ template1 │ postgres │ UTF8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │ en_US.UTF-8 │
=c/postgres   ║
║   │  │  │ │ │
postgres=CTc/postgres ║
╚═══╧══╧══╧═╧═╧═══╝
(3 rows)

postgres=# \pset linestyle double3 \pset border 2 \l
Line style (linestyle) is double3.
Border style (border) is 2.
   List of databases
╔═══╦══╦══╦═╦═╦═══╗
║   Name║  Owner   ║ Encoding ║   Collate   ║Ctype║   Access
privileges   ║
╠═══╬══╬══╬═╬═╬═══╣
║ postgres  ║ postgres ║ UTF8 ║ en_US.UTF-8 ║ en_US.UTF-8
║   ║
║ template0 ║ postgres ║ UTF8 ║ en_US.UTF-8 ║ en_US.UTF-8 ║
=c/postgres   ║
║   ║  ║  ║ ║ ║
postgres=CTc/postgres ║
║ template1 ║ postgres ║ UTF8 ║ en_US.UTF-8 ║ en_US.UTF-8 ║
=c/postgres   ║
║   ║  ║  ║ ║ ║
postgres=CTc/postgres ║
╚═══╩══╩══╩═╩═╩═══╝
(3 rows)

Pavel



commit 47b3258db6e3e82399417f57ad551ad740348635
Author: Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gooddata.com
Date:   Wed Nov 27 15:09:01 2013 +0100

initial

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
index 264cfe6..6e74690 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
@@ -2088,9 +2088,10 @@ lo_import 152801
   para
   Sets the border line drawing style to one
   of literalascii/literal, literalold-ascii/literal
-  or literalunicode/literal.
-  Unique abbreviations are allowed.  (That would mean one
-  letter is enough.)
+  or literalunicode/literal, literaldouble1/literal,
+  literaldouble2/literal or literaldouble3/literal
+  (unicode styles). Unique abbreviations are allowed.
+  (That would mean one letter is enough.)
   The 

Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-26 Thread Pavel Stehule
sorry for offtopic


2013/11/25 Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr

 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
  Even if it is it's totally off topic. Please don't hijack email threads.

 Well, when I read that parsing a user setup is too complex, for me that
 calls for a solution that offers more power to the user without us
 having to write specialized code each time.


I have a idea about sql shell with lua support - but probably as separate
application and partially written in Lua. I have no plan to push scripting
possibilities to psql.

Regards

Pavel



 I'm sorry, but I don't understand how off-topic or hijack applies here.

 Regards,
 --
 Dimitri Fontaine
 http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-26 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/22/13, 3:26 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
 website is related to patch for 9.3 (I add note there)
 
 patch for 9.4 is fixed - and now with small doc

I think it would help if we considered the new border styles and the new
line styles separately.

I don't find the new border styles to be particularly useful.  They just
use up vertical screen space, which is usually more precious than
vertical space.  Is there a situation where you would find these styles
to be more useful than the existing ones?  Keep in mind that pset is
usually set permanently, so it wouldn't be practical to use a different
border style depending on how the query results shape up (like \x auto).

Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
-double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-26 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/26 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

 On 11/22/13, 3:26 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
  website is related to patch for 9.3 (I add note there)
 
  patch for 9.4 is fixed - and now with small doc

 I think it would help if we considered the new border styles and the new
 line styles separately.

 I don't find the new border styles to be particularly useful.  They just
 use up vertical screen space, which is usually more precious than
 vertical space.  Is there a situation where you would find these styles
 to be more useful than the existing ones?  Keep in mind that pset is
 usually set permanently, so it wouldn't be practical to use a different
 border style depending on how the query results shape up (like \x auto).

 Now for the linestyles.  I can see how some of them are attractive, but
 several of them have poor aesthetics, I think.  I don't see a reason to
 accept 7 new styles just for fun.  If I had to choose, I'd consider
 -double1 and -double4 to be acceptable.


+1

Pavel


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
 there is other issue - simply parser will be really user unfriendly, and
 user friendly parser will not by simply :(

If simple things are hard to implement, get yourself better tools.

Each time we get on the topic of improving scripting abilities for our
interactive tool, it's always the same problem: having to invent a
scripting language with a whole parser is just too much work.

Maybe it's time we step back a little and consider real scripting
solutions to embed into psql, and pgbench too:

  http://ecls.sourceforge.net/ LGPL  Common Lisp
  http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/   LGPL  Scheme, Javascript, Emacs Lisp
  http://www.lua.org/  MIT   Lua

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
 Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
 there is other issue - simply parser will be really user unfriendly, and
 user friendly parser will not by simply :(

 If simple things are hard to implement, get yourself better tools.

 Each time we get on the topic of improving scripting abilities for our
 interactive tool, it's always the same problem: having to invent a
 scripting language with a whole parser is just too much work.

 Maybe it's time we step back a little and consider real scripting
 solutions to embed into psql, and pgbench too:

I'm thinking (did I miss something?) that Pavel was commenting merely
on the parsing of setting unicode border characters, not the wider
scripting of psql.  (psql scripting is a fun topic to discuss though
:-)).

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan


On 11/25/2013 09:00 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:

Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:

there is other issue - simply parser will be really user unfriendly, and
user friendly parser will not by simply :(

If simple things are hard to implement, get yourself better tools.

Each time we get on the topic of improving scripting abilities for our
interactive tool, it's always the same problem: having to invent a
scripting language with a whole parser is just too much work.

Maybe it's time we step back a little and consider real scripting
solutions to embed into psql, and pgbench too:

I'm thinking (did I miss something?) that Pavel was commenting merely
on the parsing of setting unicode border characters, not the wider
scripting of psql.  (psql scripting is a fun topic to discuss though
:-)).



Even if it is it's totally off topic. Please don't hijack email threads.


cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
 Even if it is it's totally off topic. Please don't hijack email threads.

Well, when I read that parsing a user setup is too complex, for me that
calls for a solution that offers more power to the user without us
having to write specialized code each time.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand how off-topic or hijack applies here.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Andrew Dunstan


On 11/25/2013 09:33 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:

Even if it is it's totally off topic. Please don't hijack email threads.

Well, when I read that parsing a user setup is too complex, for me that
calls for a solution that offers more power to the user without us
having to write specialized code each time.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand how off-topic or hijack applies here.





It just seems to me to be a very big stretch to go from the topic of 
psql border styles to the topic of psql scripting support. Your use case 
would surely be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. By all means argue 
for better scripting support in psql, but I would suggest your argument 
would be better if the use case were something more important and 
central to psql's purpose.


cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-25 Thread Dimitri Fontaine
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
 I'm sorry, but I don't understand how off-topic or hijack applies here.

And I just realize there's another way to read what Pavel said, which is
that *user scripts* parsing the output of psql might become harder to
write as soon as they don't control the default border style in use.

Well in that case, yes I'm vastly off-topic.

I was answering to how to parse the user setting itself, so writing C
code inside the psql source tree itself, and how to expose a fine
grained solution to that problem without having to write a whole new
configuration parser.

 It just seems to me to be a very big stretch to go from the topic of psql
 border styles to the topic of psql scripting support. Your use case would
 surely be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. By all means argue for better
 scripting support in psql, but I would suggest your argument would be better
 if the use case were something more important and central to psql's purpose.

I think I just understood something entirely different that what you
were talking about.

-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-23 Thread Vik Fearing
On 11/21/2013 10:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in core?
 Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
 by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.

I vote for doing it this way.

We would provide a default setting, and the documentation would show
other examples.  Perhaps even set up a repository on a wiki page or
something.

-- 
Vik



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello


2013/11/21 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

 On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
  Hello
 
  I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.
 
  http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
 
  This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
  for final presentation.
 
  Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
 by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.


I seriously though about it, but not sure if it is good way.

- So we still have to deliver some basic set of styles still.
- People prefer prefabricate solution with simply activation now - so
customization use only a few  people
- buitin style requires about 110 bytes and it is safe and verified,
dynamic styling requires some parser, maybe some other checks

So for this use case I prefer very primitive (and simple) design as was
proposed.

Regards

Pavel


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello


2013/11/21 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com

 On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hello
 
  I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.
 
  http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
 
  This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
  final presentation.
 
 great. hm, maybe we could integrate color? (see:

 http://merlinmoncure.blogspot.com/2012/09/psql-now-with-splash-of-color.html
 ).


it is next possible enhancing - I would to go forward in small steps,
please :)

minimally (and independent on proposed patch) we can introduce some like
final regexp filtering  - that can be used for this or other purposes.

Regards

Pavel




 merlin



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 21:15, Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:




 On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 So here is patch for 9.4

 7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete

 Regards

 Pavel




 2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


 YES!

 - Szymon



 That's pretty cool, I'd love to see it in the core, however it doesn't
 contain any documentation, so I'm afraid it will be hard to use for people.

 thanks,
 Szymon


 Hi Pavel,
 I've found two errors in the documentation at
 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 1)

 The unicode-double5 style looks like:

 x=# select * from t;
 ┌───┬───┬───┐
 │ a │ b │ t │
 ╞═══╪═══╪═══╡
 │ 1 │ 1 │ a │
 ├───┼───┼───┤
 │ 2 │ 2 │ b │
 ├───┼───┼───┤
 │ 3 │ 3 │ c │
 └───┴───┴───┘
 (3 rows)

 (There are horizontal lines between rows)

 2) There is no unicode-double6 in psql, however it exists on the website.


website is related to patch for 9.3 (I add note there)

patch for 9.4 is fixed - and now with small doc

Regards

Pavel



 regards,
 Szymon

commit 43f0026617891485f5ceddce6024b164622ac4cc
Author: root root@localhost.localdomain
Date:   Thu Nov 21 20:16:00 2013 +0100

initial

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
index 264cfe6..aad2304 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/psql-ref.sgml
@@ -1947,7 +1947,8 @@ lo_import 152801
   acronymHTML/acronym format, this will translate directly
   into the literalborder=.../literal attribute; in the
   other formats only values 0 (no border), 1 (internal dividing lines),
-  and 2 (table frame) make sense.
+  and 2 (table frame), 3 (internal dividing lines with rows
+  separators), 4 (table frame with internal divided cells).
   literallatex/literal and literallatex-longtable/literal
   also support a literalborder/literal value of 3 which adds
   a dividing line between each row.
@@ -2087,8 +2088,11 @@ lo_import 152801
   listitem
   para
   Sets the border line drawing style to one
-  of literalascii/literal, literalold-ascii/literal
-  or literalunicode/literal.
+  of literalascii/literal, literalold-ascii/literal,
+  literalunicode/literal, literalunicode-double1/literal,
+  literalunicode-double2/literal, literalunicode-double3/literal,
+  literalunicode-double4/literal, literalunicode-double5/literal,
+  literalunicode-bold1/literal or literalunicode-bold2/literal.
   Unique abbreviations are allowed.  (That would mean one
   letter is enough.)
   The default setting is literalascii/.
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/command.c b/src/bin/psql/command.c
index 638d8cb..7b2b621 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/command.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/command.c
@@ -2271,7 +2271,6 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 			psql_error(\\pset: allowed formats are unaligned, aligned, wrapped, html, latex, troff-ms\n);
 			return false;
 		}
-
 	}
 
 	/* set table line style */
@@ -2285,12 +2284,27 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 			popt-topt.line_style = pg_asciiformat_old;
 		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode, value, vallen) == 0)
 			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8format2;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double1, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double1format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double2format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double3, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double3format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double4, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double4format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double5, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double5format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-bold1, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8bold1format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-bold2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8bold2format;
 		else
 		{
 			psql_error(\\pset: allowed line styles are ascii, old-ascii, unicode\n);
 			return false;
 		}
-
 	}
 
 	/* set border style/width */
@@ -2298,7 +2312,6 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 	{
 		if (value)
 			popt-topt.border = 

Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello


 2013/11/21 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com

 On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hello
 
  I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.
 
  http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
 
  This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
  for
  final presentation.
 
 great. hm, maybe we could integrate color? (see:

 http://merlinmoncure.blogspot.com/2012/09/psql-now-with-splash-of-color.html).


 it is next possible enhancing - I would to go forward in small steps, please
 :)

 minimally (and independent on proposed patch) we can introduce some like
 final regexp filtering  - that can be used for this or other purposes.

Yeah.  A per field regexp would do the trick.  As you have it, I like
Peter's idea best.  Being able to specify the various character codes
makes a lot of sense.

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/22 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com

 On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hello
 
 
  2013/11/21 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com
 
  On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
   Hello
  
   I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.
  
   http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
  
   This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
   for
   final presentation.
  
  great. hm, maybe we could integrate color? (see:
 
 
 http://merlinmoncure.blogspot.com/2012/09/psql-now-with-splash-of-color.html
 ).
 
 
  it is next possible enhancing - I would to go forward in small steps,
 please
  :)
 
  minimally (and independent on proposed patch) we can introduce some like
  final regexp filtering  - that can be used for this or other purposes.

 Yeah.  A per field regexp would do the trick.  As you have it, I like
 Peter's idea best.  Being able to specify the various character codes
 makes a lot of sense.


there is other issue - simply parser will be really user unfriendly, and
user friendly parser will not by simply :(

have you some idea about input format?

Regards

Pavel



 merlin



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Pavel Stehule escribió:

 2013/11/21 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

  Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
  by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.
 
 I seriously though about it, but not sure if it is good way.

How about having a single unicode line style, and then have a
different \pset setting to determine exactly what chars to print?  This
wouldn't allow for programmability, but it seems better UI to me.
This proliferation of unicode line style names seems odd.

-- 
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
 Pavel Stehule escribió:

 2013/11/21 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

  Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
  by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.
 
 I seriously though about it, but not sure if it is good way.

 How about having a single unicode line style, and then have a
 different \pset setting to determine exactly what chars to print?  This
 wouldn't allow for programmability, but it seems better UI to me.
 This proliferation of unicode line style names seems odd.

That makes sense to me, especially if you could pass escapes.

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-22 Thread Pavel Stehule
2013/11/22 Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com

 Pavel Stehule escribió:

  2013/11/21 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net

   Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various
 characters
   by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.
  
  I seriously though about it, but not sure if it is good way.

 How about having a single unicode line style, and then have a
 different \pset setting to determine exactly what chars to print?  This
 wouldn't allow for programmability, but it seems better UI to me.
 This proliferation of unicode line style names seems odd.


-1

After thinking I don't see any value for common user. Users like you, me,
Merlin are able to parametrize output or patching source code.

Any parametrization expect some secure store, that will support exchange of
styles. And it expect robust parser of unicode strings, or ascii strings
with unicode escaped chars.

We cannot parse a escaped unicode chars now on client side, and cost of
parser is higher of benefit externally parametrized borders.

Regards

Pavel



 --
 Įlvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training  Services



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Szymon Guz
On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
 final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


YES!

- Szymon


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread amul sul
YES!

+1


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan


On 11/21/2013 04:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

Hello

I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
for final presentation.

Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in core?

Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.




Why not just reinvent termcap / terminfo? :-)

cheers

andrew



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
I should to appen list of new styles to doc. Style double6 doesnt exist,
because I renamed double5 to bold1 (and created second bold2)

I will update patch tomorrow - it will be in cf4

Regards

Pavel
Dne 21.11.2013 21:37 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com napsal(a):

 On 21 November 2013 21:15, Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:




 On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 So here is patch for 9.4

 7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete

 Regards

 Pavel




 2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


 YES!

 - Szymon



 That's pretty cool, I'd love to see it in the core, however it doesn't
 contain any documentation, so I'm afraid it will be hard to use for people.

 thanks,
 Szymon


 Hi Pavel,
 I've found two errors in the documentation at
 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 1)

 The unicode-double5 style looks like:

 x=# select * from t;
 ┌───┬───┬───┐
 │ a │ b │ t │
 ╞═══╪═══╪═══╡
 │ 1 │ 1 │ a │
 ├───┼───┼───┤
 │ 2 │ 2 │ b │
 ├───┼───┼───┤
 │ 3 │ 3 │ c │
 └───┴───┴───┘
 (3 rows)

 (There are horizontal lines between rows)

 2) There is no unicode-double6 in psql, however it exists on the website.

 regards,
 Szymon



Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/21/13, 2:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
 Hello
 
 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.
 
 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql
 
 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.
 
 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in core?

Maybe make the border setting a string containing the various characters
by index.  Then everyone can create their own crazy borders.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
So here is patch for 9.4

7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete

Regards

Pavel




2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
 final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


 YES!

 - Szymon

commit 170c25a680a43a9bd96e2ca923cbd2492d35ceda
Author: root root@localhost.localdomain
Date:   Thu Nov 21 20:16:00 2013 +0100

initial

diff --git a/src/bin/psql/command.c b/src/bin/psql/command.c
index 638d8cb..7b2b621 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/command.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/command.c
@@ -2271,7 +2271,6 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 			psql_error(\\pset: allowed formats are unaligned, aligned, wrapped, html, latex, troff-ms\n);
 			return false;
 		}
-
 	}
 
 	/* set table line style */
@@ -2285,12 +2284,27 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 			popt-topt.line_style = pg_asciiformat_old;
 		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode, value, vallen) == 0)
 			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8format2;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double1, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double1format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double2format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double3, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double3format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double4, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double4format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-double5, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8double5format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-bold1, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8bold1format;
+		else if (pg_strncasecmp(unicode-bold2, value, vallen) == 0)
+			popt-topt.line_style = pg_utf8bold2format;
 		else
 		{
 			psql_error(\\pset: allowed line styles are ascii, old-ascii, unicode\n);
 			return false;
 		}
-
 	}
 
 	/* set border style/width */
@@ -2298,7 +2312,6 @@ do_pset(const char *param, const char *value, printQueryOpt *popt, bool quiet)
 	{
 		if (value)
 			popt-topt.border = atoi(value);
-
 	}
 
 	/* set expanded/vertical mode */
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/print.c b/src/bin/psql/print.c
index 736225c..6f4473a 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/print.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/print.c
@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ const printTextFormat pg_asciiformat =
 		{-, +, +, +},
 		{-, +, +, +},
 		{-, +, +, +},
+		{-, +, +, +},
+		{, |, |, |},
 		{, |, |, |}
 	},
 	|,
@@ -75,6 +77,8 @@ const printTextFormat pg_asciiformat_old =
 		{-, +, +, +},
 		{-, +, +, +},
 		{-, +, +, +},
+		{-, +, +, +},
+		{, |, |, |},
 		{, |, |, |}
 	},
 	:,
@@ -97,9 +101,13 @@ const printTextFormat pg_utf8format =
 		{\342\224\200, \342\224\214, \342\224\254, \342\224\220},
 		/* ─, ├, ┼, ┤ */
 		{\342\224\200, \342\224\234, \342\224\274, \342\224\244},
+		/* ─, ├, ┼, ┤ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\224\234, \342\224\274, \342\224\244},
 		/* ─, └, ┴, ┘ */
 		{\342\224\200, \342\224\224, \342\224\264, \342\224\230},
 		/* N/A, │, │, │ */
+		{, \342\224\202, \342\224\202, \342\224\202},
+		/* N/A, │, │, │ */
 		{, \342\224\202, \342\224\202, \342\224\202}
 	},
 	/* │ */
@@ -121,6 +129,253 @@ const printTextFormat pg_utf8format =
 	true
 };
 
+const printTextFormat pg_utf8format2 = {
+	unicode2,
+	{
+		/* ─, ┌, ┬, ┐ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\224\214, \342\224\254, \342\224\220},
+		/* ─, ├, ┴, ┤ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\224\234, \342\224\264, \342\224\244},
+		/* ─, ├, ┼, ┤ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\224\234, \342\224\274, \342\224\244},
+		/* ─, └, ─, ┘ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\224\224, \342\224\200, \342\224\230},
+		/* N/A, │, │, │ */
+		{, \342\224\202, \342\224\202, \342\224\202},
+		/* N/A, │, │, │ */
+		{, \342\224\202, \342\224\202, \342\224\202}
+	},
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	false
+};
+
+const printTextFormat pg_utf8double1format = {
+	unicode-double1,
+	{
+		/* ═, ╔, ╤, ╗ */
+		{\342\225\220, \342\225\224, \342\225\244, \342\225\227},
+		/* ─, ╟, ┼, ╢ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\225\237, \342\224\274, \342\225\242},
+		/* ─, ╟, ┼, ╢ */
+		{\342\224\200, \342\225\237, \342\224\274, \342\225\242},
+		/* ═, ╚, ╧, ╝ */
+		{\342\225\220, \342\225\232, \342\225\247, \342\225\235},
+		/* N/A, ║, │, ║ */
+		{, \342\225\221, \342\224\202, \342\225\221},
+		/* N/A, ║, │, ║ */
+		{, \342\225\221, \342\224\202, \342\225\221}
+	},
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	/* │ */
+	\342\224\202,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	 ,
+	false
+};
+
+const printTextFormat 

Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Szymon Guz
On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 So here is patch for 9.4

 7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete

 Regards

 Pavel




 2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


 YES!

 - Szymon



That's pretty cool, I'd love to see it in the core, however it doesn't
contain any documentation, so I'm afraid it will be hard to use for people.

thanks,
Szymon


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
 final presentation.

great. hm, maybe we could integrate color? (see:
http://merlinmoncure.blogspot.com/2012/09/psql-now-with-splash-of-color.html).

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-21 Thread Szymon Guz
On 21 November 2013 21:15, Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com wrote:




 On 21 November 2013 20:20, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:

 So here is patch for 9.4

 7 new line styles, 2 new border styles, \pset border autocomplete

 Regards

 Pavel




 2013/11/21 Szymon Guz mabew...@gmail.com

 On 21 November 2013 08:09, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello

 I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

 http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

 This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting
 for final presentation.

 Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in
 core?

 Regards

 Pavel


 YES!

 - Szymon



 That's pretty cool, I'd love to see it in the core, however it doesn't
 contain any documentation, so I'm afraid it will be hard to use for people.

 thanks,
 Szymon


Hi Pavel,
I've found two errors in the documentation at
http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

1)

The unicode-double5 style looks like:

x=# select * from t;
┌───┬───┬───┐
│ a │ b │ t │
╞═══╪═══╪═══╡
│ 1 │ 1 │ a │
├───┼───┼───┤
│ 2 │ 2 │ b │
├───┼───┼───┤
│ 3 │ 3 │ c │
└───┴───┴───┘
(3 rows)

(There are horizontal lines between rows)

2) There is no unicode-double6 in psql, however it exists on the website.

regards,
Szymon


[HACKERS] new unicode table border styles for psql

2013-11-20 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello

I wrote new styles for  psql table borders.

http://postgres.cz/wiki/Pretty_borders_in_psql

This patch is simply and I am think so some styles can be interesting for
final presentation.

Do you think so this feature is generally interesting and should be in core?

Regards

Pavel