Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2009-02-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote:
 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
  Noticed another issue with 'client only' type installs in the
  Makefile.  Shouldn't make install on libpq install postgres_ext.h in
  addition to the interface headers?
 
 I don't think libpq's Makefile has any business doing that.
 
 Maybe we should bite the bullet and provide some kind of top-level make
 targets for client-only build/install.

Is someone going to handle this?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2009-02-04 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
 Tom Lane wrote:
 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
  Noticed another issue with 'client only' type installs in the
  Makefile.  Shouldn't make install on libpq install postgres_ext.h in
  addition to the interface headers?

 I don't think libpq's Makefile has any business doing that.

 Maybe we should bite the bullet and provide some kind of top-level make
 targets for client-only build/install.

 Is someone going to handle this?

I'll take a look.  I'm not very good with makefiles...

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2009-01-08 Thread Bruce Momjian

Did we address this?

---

Merlin Moncure wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
  Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
  IMO, the client only build should be fixed, so we can:
  *) put the makefile hack I proposed in
  *) implement the keywords.c change suggested above
  *) set up backend/parser symlink from different/additional place.
 
  The last of these seems the correct fix.  A minimal change would be
  something like
 
   submake-backend:
  +   $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend 
  $(top_builddir)/src/include/parser/gram.h
 $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend/parser keywords.o
 
 
 Noticed another issue with 'client only' type installs in the
 Makefile.  Shouldn't make install on libpq install postgres_ext.h in
 addition to the interface headers?
 
 install: all installdirs install-lib
   $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-fe.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir)'
   $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-events.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir)'
   $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-int.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir_internal)'
   $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/pqexpbuffer.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir_internal)'
   $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/pg_service.conf.sample
 '$(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/pg_service.conf.sample'
 
 merlin
 
 -- 
 Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
 To make changes to your subscription:
 http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-17 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 IMO, the client only build should be fixed, so we can:
 *) put the makefile hack I proposed in
 *) implement the keywords.c change suggested above
 *) set up backend/parser symlink from different/additional place.

 The last of these seems the correct fix.  A minimal change would be
 something like

  submake-backend:
 +   $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend 
 $(top_builddir)/src/include/parser/gram.h
$(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend/parser keywords.o


Noticed another issue with 'client only' type installs in the
Makefile.  Shouldn't make install on libpq install postgres_ext.h in
addition to the interface headers?

install: all installdirs install-lib
  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-fe.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir)'
  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-events.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir)'
  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/libpq-int.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir_internal)'
  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/pqexpbuffer.h '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir_internal)'
  $(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/pg_service.conf.sample
'$(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/pg_service.conf.sample'

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-17 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Noticed another issue with 'client only' type installs in the
 Makefile.  Shouldn't make install on libpq install postgres_ext.h in
 addition to the interface headers?

I don't think libpq's Makefile has any business doing that.

Maybe we should bite the bullet and provide some kind of top-level make
targets for client-only build/install.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-17 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Tom Lane wrote:

Maybe we should bite the bullet and provide some kind of top-level make
targets for client-only build/install.


That would probably work best.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Merlin Moncure
I'm trying to do client only builds on a bunch of legacy platforms and
noticed that the include path is messed up...if keywords.o is not
already built, it fails to build be because src/backend/parser but not
src/backend is in the include path. (keywords.c includes
parser/gram.h).

The following fixes it.  Probably not the right thing exactly but it works:

Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -r1.48 Makefile
13c13
 override CPPFLAGS := -I$(srcdir) $(CPPFLAGS)
---
 override CPPFLAGS := -I$(subdir) -I.. $(CPPFLAGS)

This would be a nice backpatch to 8.3 (and possibly earlier, I didn't check).

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I'm trying to do client only builds on a bunch of legacy platforms and
 noticed that the include path is messed up...if keywords.o is not
 already built, it fails to build be because src/backend/parser but not
 src/backend is in the include path. (keywords.c includes
 parser/gram.h).

Hmm, but nobody should be including gram.h directly out of
backend/parser anyway.  They should be getting it via the symlink in
src/include/parser.  I think the real problem must be that that symlink
isn't being created during a client-only build?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I'm trying to do client only builds on a bunch of legacy platforms and
 noticed that the include path is messed up...if keywords.o is not
 already built, it fails to build be because src/backend/parser but not
 src/backend is in the include path. (keywords.c includes
 parser/gram.h).

 Hmm, but nobody should be including gram.h directly out of
 backend/parser anyway.  They should be getting it via the symlink in
 src/include/parser.  I think the real problem must be that that symlink
 isn't being created during a client-only build?

ah, correct.  the symlink is setup in src/backend/Makefile

psql Makefile pulls in submake-backend to grab keywords.o.

submake-backend:
  $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend/parser keywords.o

so psql build is trying to build directly in backend which breaks (so
is pg_dump, the offender is a backend dependency in pg_dump from
symlinked in dumputils.c).  This looks caused  by a change to clean up
some quoting issues:

revision 1.36
date: 2007/06/18 21:40:58;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines: +18 -5
Arrange for quote_identifier() and pg_dump to not quote keywords that are
unreserved according to the grammar.  The list of unreserved words has gotten
extensive enough that the unnecessary quoting is becoming a bit of an eyesore.
To do this, add knowledge of the keyword category to keywords.c's table.
(Someday we might be able to generate keywords.c's table and the keyword lists
in gram.y from a common source.)
snip

IMO, the client only build should be fixed, so we can:
*) put the makefile hack I proposed in
*) implement the keywords.c change suggested above
*) set up backend/parser symlink from different/additional place.

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 This looks caused  by a change to clean up
 some quoting issues:

No, that patch is unrelated --- it didn't modify the inclusion situation
at all.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Merlin Moncure
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 This looks caused  by a change to clean up
 some quoting issues:

 No, that patch is unrelated --- it didn't modify the inclusion situation
 at all.


oopright againcvs annotate claims psql Makefile was modified
1.56 (dec-05)?  It's not completely clear why.  It doesn't really
matter...the dependency is clearly there.

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] patch to fix client only builds

2008-11-06 Thread Tom Lane
Merlin Moncure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 IMO, the client only build should be fixed, so we can:
 *) put the makefile hack I proposed in
 *) implement the keywords.c change suggested above
 *) set up backend/parser symlink from different/additional place.

The last of these seems the correct fix.  A minimal change would be
something like

  submake-backend:
+   $(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend 
$(top_builddir)/src/include/parser/gram.h
$(MAKE) -C $(top_builddir)/src/backend/parser keywords.o

(in at least three different Makefiles: pg_dump, psql, scripts).  But I
can't help feeling that some Makefile-refactoring seems called for here.
Peter, what do you think?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers