Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers
[Cc: trimmed] On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 01:45:11PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: key locks I'll take a look at this one. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: I've just corrected the status of a few patches in the CommitFest application. In particular, I set the following back to Needs Review. SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread determining client_encoding from client locale If anyone can jump in, that would be great. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote: * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:09 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote: Frankly, I think you should surrender some of those 14 and cajole some other folks to take on more. Happily... only trouble is, I suck at cajoling. Even my begging is distinctly sub-par. Plase? Erm, I've been through the commitfest app a couple of different times, but have ignored things which are marked 'Needs Reivew' when there's a reviewer listed... If there are patches where you're marked as the reviewer but you don't have time to review them or want help, take your name off as a reviewer for them and/or speak up and explicitly ask for help. I'm not going to start reviewing something if I think someone else is already working on it.. Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that could use more eyes: MULTISET functions Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: range types key locks widen scale factor limit from pgbench And your patch could probably use another reviewer too, if anyone else is looking for stuff to help with: log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option And there are a few patches with no reviewer at all. PL/Python invalidate composite argument functions PL/Python tracebacks contrib/btree_gist (submitted very late) SQL/MED - file_fdw -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that could use more eyes: MULTISET functions I'll work on this one. Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards I'll take a look at this one too, but I'm not that familiar with the xlog code, etc, so I'm not sure if I'll be able to comment on correctness... A few other ones that could use more reviewers include: range types key locks If I can get through the others, I'll try and come back and look at these. widen scale factor limit from pgbench I was already starting to look at this one, actually. :) And your patch could probably use another reviewer too, if anyone else is looking for stuff to help with: log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option Not sure if it counts if I review it. ;) And there are a few patches with no reviewer at all. PL/Python invalidate composite argument functions PL/Python tracebacks I thought from the other threads that we had someone working the PL/Pyton patches..? :/ contrib/btree_gist (submitted very late) Looks like this one might just be committable w/o additional review, but if it's still hanging around, I might be able to help. SQL/MED - file_fdw Ditto on this. Alright, I've marked myself as a reviewer for the ones I'll look at in the next couple days. The others are up for grabs for others, any takers on additional reviewers for them? Thanks, Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [HACKERS] patches that could use additional reviewers
--On 9. Februar 2011 13:45:11 -0500 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: Of the fourteen I signed up for, 10 are now marked Committed or Returned with Feedback. Of the remaining four, there are two that could use more eyes: I'd happily jump in and look into one of those, but before mid of next week i really have no spare time to come up with something :( -- Thanks Bernd -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
