Re: [HACKERS] per-table autovacuum configuration
Alvaro Herrera wrote: any new thoughts on the matter? Perhaps someone is already working on it? It is still a wanted feature, but a couple of people have offered patches and I'm waiting for them ... Aha, good. I was considering taking a stab at it, but under the circumstances will wait and see. regards, Martin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] per-table autovacuum configuration
There is an autovacuum TODO item suggesting pg_autovacuum to be replaced with pg_class.reloptions. Original discussion at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg01440.php A lot of time has passed -- is the proposal still valid or are there any new thoughts on the matter? Perhaps someone is already working on it? regards, Martin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] per-table autovacuum configuration
Martin Pihlak escribió: There is an autovacuum TODO item suggesting pg_autovacuum to be replaced with pg_class.reloptions. Original discussion at: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg01440.php A lot of time has passed -- is the proposal still valid or are there any new thoughts on the matter? Perhaps someone is already working on it? It is still a wanted feature, but a couple of people have offered patches and I'm waiting for them ... -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
