(2012/03/12 13:04), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > (2012/03/09 23:48), Tom Lane wrote: >> Etsuro Fujita<fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>>> 2. IMHO RelOptInfo.fdw_private seems confusing. How about renaming it >>> to e.g., RelOptInfo.fdw_state? >> >> Why is that better? It seems just as open to confusion with another >> field (ie, the execution-time fdw_state). > > I thought the risk. However, I feel that the naming of > RelOptInfo.fdw_state is not so bad because it is used only at the query > planning time, not used along with the execution-time fdw_private. I wrote the execution-time fdw_private by mistake. I meant the execution-time fdw_state. I'm sorry about that. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
