Re: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1
El Jue 18 Ene 2001 15:15, Tom Lane escribi: The other question is if I have to do something special (dump and restore) when upgrading from 7.1-beta1 to 7.1-final (or any of the other betas)? You will need an initdb to go from beta1 to beta3. Sorry about that; we try to avoid forced initdb after beta cycle starts, but sometimes it's not possible. You might want to skip testing beta1 and just start with beta3, or even a current nightly snapshot. Well, my problem was that a downgrade had to be made to the only Solaris8 SPARC back to Solaris7, and postgres broke. So I recompiled it, in a new directory, and copied the data directory to the new postgres instaltion directory, but when I connect with pgaccess to and db, I see the postgres tables (like pg_aggregate, pg_group, pg_scripts, pg_trigger, etc). Did I do something wrong? Any way to fix it? -- System Administration: It's a dirty job, but someone told I had to do it. - Martn Marqus email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Santa Fe - Argentinahttp://math.unl.edu.ar/~martin/ Administrador de sistemas en math.unl.edu.ar -
Re: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1
"Martin A. Marques" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm compiling beta 1 of 7.1 and I have a par of questions. analyze.c: In function `transformInsertStmt': analyze.c:425: warning: unused variable `resnode' Fixed in current sources. (I think there is still one unused-var complaint left in the XLOG code; I've been waiting on Vadim to do something about it, because it looks like there is code still to be written there.) The other question is if I have to do something special (dump and restore) when upgrading from 7.1-beta1 to 7.1-final (or any of the other betas)? You will need an initdb to go from beta1 to beta3. Sorry about that; we try to avoid forced initdb after beta cycle starts, but sometimes it's not possible. You might want to skip testing beta1 and just start with beta3, or even a current nightly snapshot. regards, tom lane
RE: [HACKERS] compiling 7.1-beta1
Fixed in current sources. (I think there is still one unused-var complaint left in the XLOG code; I've been waiting on Vadim to do something about it, because it looks like there is code still to be written there.) Just commented out for now. Vadim
