On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 21:31, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Katsaros Kwn/nos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > More precisely,when I call (my_)SPI_prepare the following message comes
> > exactly at the point where (my_)SPI_end_call(true) is called:
>
> > WARNING: problem in alloc set my_SPI Exec: detected write past chunk
> > end in block 0x830b7e8, chunk 0x830c058
> > WARNING: problem in alloc set my_SPI Exec: detected write past chunk
> > end in block 0x8307720, chunk 0x830b6cc
>
> > Any ideas? I think it is something with the memory contexts but
> > obviously this is not enough to solve the problem.
>
> I'd bet on buffer-overrun problems. Check your allocation request sizes
> against what's actually being used.
I tried to increase the allocated memory using ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_*SIZE
just to see what would happen, but nothing.What is returned is a Plan
node and some (3 in my example) Query nodes. All inside a List. Are
these too big to fit?
When my user defined procedure (that calls my_SPI functions) returns,
the following message also appears:
WARNING: problem in alloc set my_SPI Results: detected write past chunk
end in block 0x8313550, chunk 0x8315140
which is obviously about the same kind of problem. The thing is that I
noticed that this latter message appears as many times as I palloc
inside my_SPI_copy_results() function which is an extension of
_SPI_copy_plan().
I cannot understand what the problem is since I do similar things with
_SPI_copy_plan. I palloc() exactly at the same places with the original
func. Is it that I use Lists as a mean of returning multiple objects to
the user defined function or even that I call another function that
pallocs before calling my_SPI_copy_results() (this other function
produces the Query nodes)? Are there any other places in the source
other than (my_)spi.c, (my_)spi.h and xact.c (AtEOXact_(my_)SPI() call)
that I should make an entry regarding my code?
Thanks for your interest!
Ntinos
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
