Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Hallgren
 This is what I currently have:

 #if (CATALOG_VERSION_NO = 200211021)
 #define PG_VERSION_73_COMPAT
 #elif (CATALOG_VERSION_NO = 200310211)
 #define PG_VERSION_74_COMPAT
 #else
 #define PG_VERSION_75_COMPAT
 #endif

 Since CATALOG_VERSION_NO doesn't change between major releases, it seems
 to work pretty well.

 Joe

Ok, thanks for the tip. Somewhat cleaner than what I suggested.

Your solution doesn't cover the situations when you have dependencies on
patch versions though, does it? There's no way to distinguish between 7.4.1
and 7.4.2 if the catalog version doesn't change. Such situations will arise.
A module author finds a bug in the backend, reports it, and creates a less
than perfekt work-around in his own code. At some point the bug gets
properly fixed and included in some patch release. Using that release, the
work-around is obsolete.

I had an example when this happened a while back (concerning loss of
MemoryContext between function ivocations). My workaround was really ugly
(using the parent MemoryContext) and could potentially waste a lot of memory
so it was imperative to actually get rid of it as soon as the patch was
released.

regards,

Thomas Hallgren



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
  joining column's datatypes do not match


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Hallgren

Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 DBD::Pg uses pg_config --version and parses the output to set the
 version information before compiling. It finds pg_config by using
 PG envrironment variables, or looks in the path. Once running, it
 does a SELECT version() to find out what server it is running
 against. Whenever possible, is now uses the new protocol version
 information. It's much handier to just say:

 if (protocol=3) {
 ...
 }


Great! The SELECT version() approach has the advantage of having an
already compiled version adapt to different versions of the backend. I'll
try and use that to overcome differences in patch levels.

Thanks,

Thomas Hallgren


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-12 Thread Tom Lane
 Joe Conway wrote:
 #if (CATALOG_VERSION_NO = 200211021)
 #define PG_VERSION_73_COMPAT
 
 Since CATALOG_VERSION_NO doesn't change between major releases, it seems
 to work pretty well.

That approach also has the nice property that it already works for all
releases back to 7.0, whereas anything we add now would only be useful
starting in 7.5 ...

Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Your solution doesn't cover the situations when you have dependencies on
 patch versions though, does it? There's no way to distinguish between 7.4.1
 and 7.4.2 if the catalog version doesn't change.

Perhaps not, but I think it would be pretty risky to depend on an #ifdef
to tell you which backend minor version you're running in anyway.  Addon
libraries are unlikely to get upgraded at the same times that the
backend does, so it's certainly plausible that you could be running in a
later minor release than you were compiled with.  If people copy
executables between machines then the reverse is easily possible too.
The only real version tiedown we have at the moment is to put extension
libraries into a PG-version-specific $libdir, and that is not going to
narrow things more closely than the PG major version in most setups.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 The PGSQL_MAJOR_VER and PGSQL_MINOR_VER does not exist today. Ideally, 
 I'd like to find them in src/Makefile.global. Only thing present seems 
 to be the VERSION. I'd like to see something like:

 PGSQL_MAJOR_VER := 7
 PGSQL_MINOR_VER := 5
 PGSQL_PATCH_VER := devel
 VERSION := $(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER).$(PGSQL_MINOR_VER).$(PGSQL_PATCH_VER)

 To be used in CPPFLAGS as: -DPGSQL_MAJOR_VER=$(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER) etc.

Wouldn't it be better to just put those #defines in to begin with,
rather than requiring people to hack on their CPPFLAGS?  I don't offhand
see much need for knowing the PG version at the Makefile level, but I
do see the usefulness at the C-code level.

I think Joe Conway is already doing something like this for pl/r ...
leastwise he's shown bits of #ifdef'd code in past email.  It would
be interesting to see the details of his solution.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-11 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The PGSQL_MAJOR_VER and PGSQL_MINOR_VER does not exist today. Ideally, 
I'd like to find them in src/Makefile.global. Only thing present seems 
to be the VERSION. I'd like to see something like:


PGSQL_MAJOR_VER := 7
PGSQL_MINOR_VER := 5
PGSQL_PATCH_VER := devel
VERSION := $(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER).$(PGSQL_MINOR_VER).$(PGSQL_PATCH_VER)


To be used in CPPFLAGS as: -DPGSQL_MAJOR_VER=$(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER) etc.


Wouldn't it be better to just put those #defines in to begin with,
rather than requiring people to hack on their CPPFLAGS?  I don't offhand
see much need for knowing the PG version at the Makefile level, but I
do see the usefulness at the C-code level.
I think Joe Conway is already doing something like this for pl/r ...
leastwise he's shown bits of #ifdef'd code in past email.  It would
be interesting to see the details of his solution.
			regards, tom lane

If the PostgreSQL source distribution had #defines residing in 
postgres.h or similar, that would certanly do the trick for me. Until 
they arrive I'll use the following (somewhat backward) solution to the 
problem. My makefile now contains the following and it seems to do the job:

include $(PGSQLDIR)/src/Makefile.global

# Substitute dot for whitespace so that we can pick
# the individual parts later on with the $(word,...)
#
SS_VERSION := $(subst ., ,$(subst devel,.devel,$(VERSION)))
# Pass major, minor, and patch to the preprocessor
#
override CPPFLAGS := \
-DPKGLIBDIR=\$(pkglibdir)\ -I$(INCLDIR) \
-DPGSQL_MAJOR_VER=$(word 1,$(SS_VERSION)) \
-DPGSQL_MINOR_VER=$(word 2,$(SS_VERSION)) \
-DPGSQL_PATCH_VER=$(word 3,$(SS_VERSION)) \
$(CPPFLAGS)
The PGSQLDIR points to the PostgreSQL source distribution. The reason 
for the two level (subst...) command is that you currently use 7.5devel 
as the VERSION, i.e. no '.' between minor and patch. IMHO, 7.5.devel 
would be more consistent.

Regards,

Thomas Hallgren

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
  http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-11 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
 
 
DBD::Pg uses pg_config --version and parses the output to set the
version information before compiling. It finds pg_config by using
PG envrironment variables, or looks in the path. Once running, it
does a SELECT version() to find out what server it is running
against. Whenever possible, is now uses the new protocol version
information. It's much handier to just say:
 
if (protocol=3) {
...
}
 
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200405112153
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 
iD8DBQFAoYRyvJuQZxSWSsgRAj8oAJwP4AxEYsBwnbeo4Aw97JtCpUC4tACgo0P1
WMvC9yck8REb15E4uod56hA=
=C2GF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [HACKERS] Module dependency on PostgeSQL version

2004-05-11 Thread Joe Conway
Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PGSQL_MAJOR_VER := 7
PGSQL_MINOR_VER := 5
PGSQL_PATCH_VER := devel
VERSION := $(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER).$(PGSQL_MINOR_VER).$(PGSQL_PATCH_VER)

To be used in CPPFLAGS as: -DPGSQL_MAJOR_VER=$(PGSQL_MAJOR_VER) etc.
Wouldn't it be better to just put those #defines in to begin with,
rather than requiring people to hack on their CPPFLAGS?  I don't offhand
see much need for knowing the PG version at the Makefile level, but I
do see the usefulness at the C-code level.
I think Joe Conway is already doing something like this for pl/r ...
leastwise he's shown bits of #ifdef'd code in past email.  It would
be interesting to see the details of his solution.
This is what I currently have:

#if (CATALOG_VERSION_NO = 200211021)
#define PG_VERSION_73_COMPAT
#elif (CATALOG_VERSION_NO = 200310211)
#define PG_VERSION_74_COMPAT
#else
#define PG_VERSION_75_COMPAT
#endif
Since CATALOG_VERSION_NO doesn't change between major releases, it seems 
to work pretty well.

Joe

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
 joining column's datatypes do not match