Re: [HACKERS] Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
Bruce Momjian wrote: This documentation This page was missed in the SSI documentation update. I don't want to get distracted by it today, but we'll need to get this done for 9.1. I guess I need to grep the sgml files for other mentions of max_locks_per_transaction for other possible misses. -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: Bruce Momjian wrote: Can someone update the PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC Right now it says Approximate shared memory bytes required (as of 8.3). This documentation still says as of 8.3. If they are unchanged, can I just remove the version mention? Mentioning the version was intentional, so that people could gauge how obsolete the information might be. I certainly think it'd be inappropriate to remove that caution flag right now, when the SSI patch has likely blown those numbers all to heck. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes: Bruce Momjian wrote: Can someone update the PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC Right now it says Approximate shared memory bytes required (as of 8.3). This documentation still says as of 8.3. If they are unchanged, can I just remove the version mention? Mentioning the version was intentional, so that people could gauge how obsolete the information might be. I certainly think it'd be inappropriate to remove that caution flag right now, when the SSI patch has likely blown those numbers all to heck. OK, thanks. I was hoping that either the numbers are stable, or we are always going to update them for every major release, but alas, seems what we do now is the best option. -- Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Update PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0?
Bruce Momjian wrote: Can someone update the PostgreSQL shared memory usage table for 9.0? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC Right now it says Approximate shared memory bytes required (as of 8.3). This documentation still says as of 8.3. If they are unchanged, can I just remove the version mention? -- Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
