Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
SuSE Linux 8.0 On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 07:41, Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org -- Ettore Simone SuSE Linux srl Cel. +39 348 4904011 Via Montanara, 26 Tel. +39 059 5395 41 41051 Castelnuovo R. (MO) Fax +39 059 5332009 Via Proust, 40 Tel. +39 06 50514545 00143 Roma ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? It's right here in SuSE Linux 8.0. It was not in 7.3, so maybe it's officially included from now on. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? SuSE 8.0: postgresql 5432/tcp# PostgreSQL Database postqresql 5432/udp# PostgreSQL Database I'll check OpenBSD 3.1 when I'm done installing. -- Jonathan Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] history is paling my surge protection failed, so I FRIED - Concrete Blonde, Fried ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
rise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? SuSE 8.0: postgresql5432/tcp# PostgreSQL Database postqresql5432/udp# PostgreSQL Database Mph, complete with the typo in the UDP entry. Hang onto that, it'll be a collector's item someday ;-) regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Tom Lane wrote: rise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? SuSE 8.0: postgresql 5432/tcp# PostgreSQL Database postqresql 5432/udp# PostgreSQL Database Mph, complete with the typo in the UDP entry. Hang onto that, it'll be a collector's item someday ;-) Isn't Suse centralizing development for the new UnitedLinux2? Guess Red Hat doesn't have much to worry about. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: This is inconsistent with the official IANA assignment which reads Thanks. I'll update my services file and check all those I come into contact with. I'll check if a new install if Redhat 7.3 has the correct entries this weekend. postgresql 5432/tcp# PostgreSQL Database postqresql 5432/udp# PostgreSQL Database # Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The spelling might have been fixed by now.) It is corrected. You should probably file a bug report for your OS. Interesting. I've never done this before. Most of the problems like this I see after someone else has repored them. Maybe I'll get my 5 minutes of fame. Cheers, Rod -- Please don't tell my mother I'm a System Administrator. She thinks I play piano in a bordello. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
FreeBSD On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
I see PostgreSQL in /etc/services on an upgraded Redhat Linux 7.3 system. Don't think it was me adding it since I didn't have PG running on the system. Rod -- Please don't tell my mother I'm a System Administrator. She thinks I play piano in a bordello. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Hi! Mandrake Linux release 8.1 also and without postgres rpms installed. [nach@golfinho ~]$ cat /etc/services | grep 5432 # 5432-5434 Unassigned postgres5432/tcp# POSTGRES postgres5432/udp# POSTGRES -- o__Bem haja, _./ _ NunoACHenriques (_) \(_) ~~~ http://students.fct.unl.pt/users/nuno/ On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: I see PostgreSQL in /etc/services on an upgraded Redhat Linux 7.3 system. Don't think it was me adding it since I didn't have PG running on the system. Rod ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Debian woody (to be 3.0 RSN . . . or something) has this in /etc/services: postgres5432/tcp# POSTGRES postgres5432/udp# POSTGRES A -- Andrew Sullivan 87 Mowat Avenue Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada [EMAIL PROTECTED] M6K 3E3 +1 416 646 3304 x110 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? Debian GNU/Linux is, or at least will be for the imminent 3.0 release. Mike. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 10:55, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? Debian GNU/Linux is, or at least will be for the imminent 3.0 release. It's in FreeBSD 4-STABLE, and definitely in 4.6-RELEASE which is due out tomorrow. (or shortly thereafter). Mike. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Bruce Momjian writes: Sure, then let's start using getservbyname(), if it works. One thing that had occurred to me is that this probably doesn't work in Java, so you couldn't do configure --with-pgport=postgresql. That reduces the potential value a lot. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Use of /etc/services?
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: Since we now have an official entry in /etc/services, shouldn't we be able to make use of it, by using getservbyname() if a nonnumeric port number is specified? Is any OS actually shipping us in /etc/services? NetBSD will be, as of 1.7, though the 1.7 release is a while away yet. (Sorry, I didn't find out about this in time to get it into for 1.6, which is just about to be released.) cjs -- Curt Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
