I need some expert advice on how to optimize a translation query (this word choice will become clear shortly, I hope).
Say I have aHUMONGOUS table of foreign language translations (call it TRANS) with records like these:
meaning_id: 1
language_id: 5
translation: jidoosha
meaning_id: 1
language_id: 2
translation: voiture
meaning_id: 1
language_id: 5
translation: kuruma
meaning_id: 2
language_id: 2
translation: chat
meaning_id: 2
language_id: 5
translation: neko
meaning_id: 2
language_id: 3
translation: katz
meaning_id: 3
language_id: 4
translation: pesce
meaning_id: 3
language_id: 2
translation: poisson
meaning_id: 3
language_id: 5
translation: sakana
For the sake of this description, let's assume that the records above are all the records in TRANS (though in fact the number of records in TRANS is really abouttenmillion times greater).
Now suppose I have a tiny table calledINPUT consisting of single textfield (say, word). E.g. suppose thatINPUT looks like this:
katz
voiturepesce
Now, let's fix a language_id, say 5. This is the target language_id. Given this target language_id, and this particular INPUT table, I want the results of the query to be something like this:
neko
jidoosha
kuruma
sakana
I.e. for each word W in INPUT, the query must first findeach record Rin TRANS that hasW as its translation field; then find each record Q in TRANSwhose language_id is 5 (the target language_id) AND has the same meaning_id as R does.
E.g.if W is 'katz', then R is
meaning_id: 2
language_id: 3
translation: katz
and therefore the desired Q is
meaning_id: 2
language_id: 5
translation: neko
...and so on.
The only difficulty here is that performance is critical, and in real life,TRANS has around 50M records (and growing),while INPUT has typicallybetween 500and 1000 records.
Any advice on how to make this as fast as possible would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
G.
P.S. Just to show that this post is not just from a college student trying to get around doing homework, below I post my most successful query so far. It works, but it's performance isn't great. And it is annoyingly complex, to boot; I'mvery much the SQLnoob, and if nothing else, at least I'd like to learn to writebetter (
i.e. more elegant,morelegible, more clueful)SQL that this:
SELECT q3.translation, q2.otherstuffFROM( SELECT INPUT.word, q1.meaning_id, INPUT.otherstuff FROM INPUT INNER JOIN ( SELECT translation, meaning_id FROM TRANS WHERE translation IN (SELECT word FROM INPUT)
) AS q1 ON INPUT.word = q1.translation) AS q2LEFT JOIN( SELECT translation, meaning_id FROM TRANS WHERE language_id=5) AS q3ON q2.meaning_id=q3.meaning_id;
As you can see, there are additional fields that I didn't mention in my original description (e.g. INPUT.otherstuff). Also the above is actually a subquery in a larger query, but it is by far, the worst bottleneck. Last, there's an index on TRANS(translation).