Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-14 Thread Lacey Powers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:


Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this.  Loudly.
It's a serious packaging error.


Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.



Hello Everyone,

New packages for 8.4.4 on CentOS 5.5 and RHEL 5.5 (all arches), have 
been built, and are available in the PGDG repo.


http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.4/redhat/rhel-5-i386/
http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/8.4/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64/

Output from pg_config --configure --version is below.

x86_64:

'--build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'--target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' 
'--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' 
'--sysconfdir=/etc' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include' 
'--libdir=/usr/lib64' '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var' 
'--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' 
'--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--disable-rpath' '--with-perl' 
'--with-python' '--with-tcl' '--with-tclconfig=/usr/lib64' 
'--with-openssl' '--with-pam' '--with-krb5' '--with-gssapi' 
'--with-includes=/usr/include' '--with-libraries=/usr/lib64' 
'--enable-nls' '--enable-thread-safety' '--with-libxml' '--with-libxslt' 
'--with-ldap' '--with-system-tzdata=/usr/share/zoneinfo' 
'--sysconfdir=/etc/sysconfig/pgsql' '--datadir=/usr/share/pgsql' 
'--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc' 'build_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'host_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'target_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall 
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -I/usr/include/et' 
'CPPFLAGS= -I/usr/include/et'

PostgreSQL 8.4.4

i386:

'--build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' '--host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'--target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr' 
'--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin' 
'--sysconfdir=/etc' '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/include' 
'--libdir=/usr/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/libexec' '--localstatedir=/var' 
'--sharedstatedir=/usr/com' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' 
'--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--disable-rpath' '--with-perl' 
'--with-python' '--with-tcl' '--with-tclconfig=/usr/lib' 
'--with-openssl' '--with-pam' '--with-krb5' '--with-gssapi' 
'--with-includes=/usr/include' '--with-libraries=/usr/lib' 
'--enable-nls' '--enable-thread-safety' '--with-libxml' '--with-libxslt' 
'--with-ldap' '--with-system-tzdata=/usr/share/zoneinfo' 
'--sysconfdir=/etc/sysconfig/pgsql' '--datadir=/usr/share/pgsql' 
'--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc' 'build_alias=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'host_alias=i686-redhat-linux-gnu' 'target_alias=i386-redhat-linux-gnu' 
'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions 
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/usr/include/et' 
'CPPFLAGS= -I/usr/include/et'

PostgreSQL 8.4.4

Again, I extend deep apologies for the inconvenience.

If there is anything further we can help with, please let us know.

Regards,

Lacey

--
Lacey Powers

The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 ext 104
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-11 Thread John Reeve
Greg Smith greg at 2ndquadrant.com writes:

 
 Max Williams wrote:
  Can I just turn this off on 8.4.4 or is it a compile time option
 
 You can update your postgresql.conf to include:
 
 debug_assertions = false
 
 And restart the server.  This will buy you back *some* of the 
 performance loss but not all of it.  Will have to wait for corrected 
 packaged to make the issue completely go away.
 


Ah! I am so thankful I found this thread. We've been having the same issues 
described here. And when I do a SHOW debug_assertions I get:


postgres=# show debug_assertions;
 debug_assertions
--
 on
(1 row)


Can you let us know when the corrected packages have become available?

Regards,
John



-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Max Williams
Well the packages are from the pgdg repo which I would have thought are pretty 
common?
https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/wiki


-Original Message-
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 10 June 2010 02:52
To: Max Williams
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 
8.4.4?

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com wrote:
 Any input? I can reproduce these numbers consistently. If you need more
 information then just let me know. By the way, I am a new postgresql user so
 my experience is limited.

Maybe different compile options?  If we'd really slowed things down by
50% between 8.4.3 and 8.4.4, there'd be an awful lot of people
screaming about it...

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com
 wrote:
  Any input? I can reproduce these numbers consistently. If you need
 more
  information then just let me know. By the way, I am a new postgresql
 user so
  my experience is limited.
 
 Maybe different compile options?  If we'd really slowed things down by
 50% between 8.4.3 and 8.4.4, there'd be an awful lot of people
 screaming about it... 

Given that there are 2 recent reports on the same issue, I wonder if the
new packages were built with debugging options or not.

-- 
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Max Williams
How do I tell if it was built with debugging options?


-Original Message-
From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ [mailto:dev...@gunduz.org] 
Sent: 10 June 2010 09:30
To: Robert Haas
Cc: Max Williams; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 
8.4.4?

On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 21:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com
 wrote:
  Any input? I can reproduce these numbers consistently. If you need
 more
  information then just let me know. By the way, I am a new postgresql
 user so
  my experience is limited.
 
 Maybe different compile options?  If we'd really slowed things down by 
 50% between 8.4.3 and 8.4.4, there'd be an awful lot of people 
 screaming about it...

Given that there are 2 recent reports on the same issue, I wonder if the new 
packages were built with debugging options or not.

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer PostgreSQL RPM 
Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr 
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Lane
Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com writes:
 How do I tell if it was built with debugging options?

Run pg_config --configure and see if --enable-cassert is mentioned.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Max Williams
I'm afraid pg_config is not part of the pgdg packages.


-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
Sent: 10 June 2010 15:11
To: Max Williams
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 
8.4.4? 

Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com writes:
 How do I tell if it was built with debugging options?

Run pg_config --configure and see if --enable-cassert is mentioned.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Kevin Grittner
Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com wrote:
 
 I'm afraid pg_config is not part of the pgdg packages.
 
Connect (using psql or your favorite client) and run:
 
show debug_assertions;
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Lane
Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com writes:
 I'm afraid pg_config is not part of the pgdg packages.

Sure it is.  They might've put it in the -devel subpackage, though.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Max Williams
Ah, yes its OFF for 8.4.3 and ON for 8.4.4!

Can I just turn this off on 8.4.4 or is it a compile time option?
Also is this a mistake or intended? Perhaps I should tell the person who builds 
the pgdg packages??

Cheers,
Max


-Original Message-
From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov] 
Sent: 10 June 2010 16:16
To: Max Williams; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 
8.4.4?

Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com wrote:
 
 I'm afraid pg_config is not part of the pgdg packages.
 
Connect (using psql or your favorite client) and run:
 
show debug_assertions;
 
-Kevin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Tom Lane
Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com writes:
 Ah, yes its OFF for 8.4.3 and ON for 8.4.4!

Hah.

 Can I just turn this off on 8.4.4 or is it a compile time option?

Well, you can turn it off, but that will only buy back part of the
cost (and not even the bigger part, I believe).

 Also is this a mistake or intended? Perhaps I should tell the person who 
 builds the pgdg packages??

Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this.  Loudly.
It's a serious packaging error.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:

 Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this.  Loudly.
 It's a serious packaging error.

Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-10 Thread Greg Smith

Max Williams wrote:

Can I just turn this off on 8.4.4 or is it a compile time option


You can update your postgresql.conf to include:

debug_assertions = false

And restart the server.  This will buy you back *some* of the 
performance loss but not all of it.  Will have to wait for corrected 
packaged to make the issue completely go away.


--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
g...@2ndquadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


[PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-09 Thread Max Williams
Hi,
I was doing some benchmarking while changing configuration options to try to 
get more performance out of our postgresql servers and noticed that when 
running pgbench against 8.4.3 vs 8.4.4 on identical hardware and configuration 
there is a large difference in performance. I know tuning is a very deep topic 
and benchmarking is hardly an accurate indication of real world performance but 
I was still surprised by these results and wanted to know what I am doing wrong.

OS is CentOS 5.5 and the postgresql packages are from the pgdg repo.

Hardware specs are:
2x Quad core Xeons 2.4Ghz
16GB RAM
2x RAID1 7.2k RPM disks (slow I know, but we are upgrading them soon..)

Relevant Postgresql Configuration:
max_connections = 1000
shared_buffers = 4096MB
temp_buffers = 8MB
max_prepared_transactions = 1000
work_mem = 8MB
maintenance_work_mem = 512MB
wal_buffers = 8MB
checkpoint_segments = 192
checkpoint_timeout = 30min
effective_cache_size = 12288MB

Results for the 8.4.3 (8.4.3-2PGDG.el5) host:
[r...@some-host ~]# pgbench -h dbs3 -U postgres -i -s 100 pgbench1  /dev/null 
21  pgbench -h dbs3 -U postgres -c 100 -t 10 pgbench1
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 100
query mode: simple
number of clients: 100
number of transactions per client: 10
number of transactions actually processed: 1000/1000
tps = 5139.554921 (including connections establishing)
tps = 5140.325850 (excluding connections establishing)
opreport:
CPU: Intel Core/i7, speed 2394.07 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a unit mask 
of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 10
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
 37705832 61.3683 postgres
 18472598 30.0652 no-vmlinux
  4982274  8.1089 libc-2.5.so
   138517  0.2254 oprofiled
   134628  0.2191 libm-2.5.so
 1465  0.0024 libc-2.5.so
 1454  0.0024 libperl.so
  793  0.0013 libdcsupt.so.5.9.2
  444 7.2e-04 dsm_sa_datamgrd
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
  401 90.3153 dsm_sa_datamgrd
   43  9.6847 anon (tgid:8013 range:0xe000-0xf000)
  410 6.7e-04 libxml2.so.2.6.26
  356 5.8e-04 ld-2.5.so
  332 5.4e-04 libnetsnmp.so.10.0.3
  327 5.3e-04 dsm_sa_snmpd
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
  255 77.9817 dsm_sa_snmpd
   72 22.0183 anon (tgid:8146 range:0xe000-0xf000)
  304 4.9e-04 libcrypto.so.0.9.8e
  290 4.7e-04 libpthread-2.5.so
  199 3.2e-04 libdcsmil.so.5.9.2
  139 2.3e-04 modclusterd
snip

Results for the 8.4.4 (8.4.4-1PGDG.el5) host:
[root@ some-host ~]# pgbench -h dbs4 -U postgres -i -s 100 pgbench1  /dev/null 
21  pgbench -h dbs4 -U postgres -c 100 -t 10 pgbench1
starting vacuum...end.
transaction type: TPC-B (sort of)
scaling factor: 100
query mode: simple
number of clients: 100
number of transactions per client: 10
number of transactions actually processed: 1000/1000
tps = 2765.643549 (including connections establishing)
tps = 2765.931203 (excluding connections establishing)
opreport:
CPU: Intel Core/i7, speed 2394.07 MHz (estimated)
Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a unit mask 
of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 10
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
312481395 84.5038 postgres
 41861164 11.3204 no-vmlinux
 14290652  3.8646 libc-2.5.so
   812148  0.2196 oprofiled
   305909  0.0827 libm-2.5.so
 7647  0.0021 libc-2.5.so
 3809  0.0010 libdcsupt.so.5.9.2
 3077 8.3e-04 libperl.so
 2302 6.2e-04 dsm_sa_datamgrd
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
 2113 91.7897 dsm_sa_datamgrd
  189  8.2103 anon (tgid:8075 range:0xe000-0xf000)
 2175 5.9e-04 libxml2.so.2.6.26
 1455 3.9e-04 dsm_sa_snmpd
CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
  samples|  %|
--
 1226 84.2612 dsm_sa_snmpd
  229 15.7388 anon (tgid:8208 range:0xe000-0xf000)
 1227 3.3e-04 libdchipm.so.5.9.2
 1192 3.2e-04 libpthread-2.5.so
  804 2.2e-04 libnetsnmp.so.10.0.3
  745 2.0e-04 modclusterd
snip

Any input? I can reproduce these numbers consistently. If you need more 
information then just let me know. By the way, I am a new postgresql user so my 
experience is limited.
Cheers,
Max


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-09 Thread Pierre C


Can you give the config params for those :

fsync =
synchronous_commit =
wal_sync_method =

Also, some vmstat 1 output during the runs would be interesting.

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


Re: [PERFORM] Large (almost 50%!) performance drop after upgrading to 8.4.4?

2010-06-09 Thread Robert Haas
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Max Williams max.willi...@mflow.com wrote:
 Any input? I can reproduce these numbers consistently. If you need more
 information then just let me know. By the way, I am a new postgresql user so
 my experience is limited.

Maybe different compile options?  If we'd really slowed things down by
50% between 8.4.3 and 8.4.4, there'd be an awful lot of people
screaming about it...

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance