Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
super! On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:56:00 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: yes, I will move to his own package On 9 Mar 2017, at 18:52, stepharong wrote: esteban I have the impression that externalForm should be independent of OSWindows. stef On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:15:54 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the only place where it was being used. We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s own). Esteban On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project specific name? Advice with best practice would be nice :) Cheers, Alex -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
yes, I will move to his own package > On 9 Mar 2017, at 18:52, stepharong wrote: > > esteban > > I have the impression that externalForm should be independent of OSWindows. > > stef > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:15:54 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano > wrote: > >> well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the only >> place where it was being used. >> We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s own). >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: >>> >>> ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. >>> >>> If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is >>> the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project >>> specific name? >>> >>> Advice with best practice would be nice :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alex >> >> > > > -- > Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
esteban I have the impression that externalForm should be independent of OSWindows. stef On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:15:54 +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the only place where it was being used. We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s own). Esteban On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project specific name? Advice with best practice would be nice :) Cheers, Alex -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
Aha, ok :) Will copy, thanks! Cheers, Alex On 9 March 2017 at 13:25, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > It's own please, because it is a subclass of Form and in UnifiedFFI it > would make a dependency of FFI on graphics > > -- Pavel > > 2017-03-09 12:15 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano : > >> well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the >> only place where it was being used. >> We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s >> own). >> >> Esteban >> >> > On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: >> > >> > ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. >> > >> > If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what >> is the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project >> specific name? >> > >> > Advice with best practice would be nice :) >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Alex >> >> >> >
Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
It's own please, because it is a subclass of Form and in UnifiedFFI it would make a dependency of FFI on graphics -- Pavel 2017-03-09 12:15 GMT+01:00 Esteban Lorenzano : > well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the > only place where it was being used. > We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s > own). > > Esteban > > > On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > > > > ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. > > > > If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is > the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project > specific name? > > > > Advice with best practice would be nice :) > > > > Cheers, > > Alex > > >
Re: [Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
well… it was removed and I put it on OSWindows-SDL2 because it was the only place where it was being used. We can move it again to a more general place (Like UnifiedFFI… or it’s own). Esteban > On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:54, Aliaksei Syrel wrote: > > ... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. > > If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is the > right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project specific > name? > > Advice with best practice would be nice :) > > Cheers, > Alex
[Pharo-dev] ExternalForm was removed 10 days ago in 60413
... and was moved to OSWindow-SDL2 as OSSDL2ExternalForm. If we require external form but don't want to depend on OSWindow what is the right way to go? Do we need to copy OSSDL2ExternalForm with project specific name? Advice with best practice would be nice :) Cheers, Alex
