Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
I see & but not aBool and: [ ...] The latter is more in line with the actual usage, no? Phil On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 12:57 Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
I would love to see: select: thenCollect: Or at lease collect: since this is where we do have more power. do: yeah but not that inspiring. Phil On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 12:57 Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Super light gray on white is hard to see for me (and I guess other vision challenged people). Other than that, yes, definitely great. Phil On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 13:21 Peter Uhnák wrote: > This is a really nice overview! > > Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the > remaining "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. > > > Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my > teaching this always confuses people. :) > > And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): > annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps > definition of unary/binary message? > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax >> postcard: >> >> >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg >> >> Cheers, >> -- Pavel >> > >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Excellent work! Doru > On Jun 1, 2018, at 11:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > > Thanks to all for feedback. Updated. > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Related can be found here: > https://github.com/pavel-krivanek/pharoMaterials/tree/master/postcard > > -- Pavel > > 2018-06-01 13:20 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák : > This is a really nice overview! > > Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the remaining > "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. > > > Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my > teaching this always confuses people. :) > > And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): > annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps > definition of unary/binary message? > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel > > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We cannot reach the flow of things unless we let go."
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Thanks to all for feedback. Updated. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg Related can be found here: https://github.com/pavel-krivanek/pharoMaterials/tree/master/postcard -- Pavel 2018-06-01 13:20 GMT+02:00 Peter Uhnák : > This is a really nice overview! > > Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the > remaining "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. > > > Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my > teaching this always confuses people. :) > > And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): > annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps > definition of unary/binary message? > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax >> postcard: >> >> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_sy >> ntax_postcard.svg >> >> Cheers, >> -- Pavel >> > >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Thank you! It's really nice! On 01/06/2018 07:56, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel -- Esteban A. Maringolo
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Pavel Krivanek-3 wrote > syntax postcard: Ha ha, I love the real-postcard look! Two things: 1. "metod name" at the top is missing an $h 2. Might it be worthwhile to add something like "compile-time" to "literal array" to better distinguish from "array generate at runtime"? - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Cool & beautiful ! The $p are good for me. I agree with the other remarks. I would love a big A4 landscape version. > On 1 Jun 2018, at 13:20, Peter Uhnák wrote: > > This is a really nice overview! > > Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the remaining > "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. > > > Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my > teaching this always confuses people. :) > > And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): > annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps > definition of unary/binary message? > > Peter > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek > wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
This is a really nice overview! Two "p" characters are rendered weirdly for me (Chrome 66), but the remaining "p"s are good. The zoom level doesn't matter. Could you please include keyword message with multiple parameters? From my teaching this always confuses people. :) And if you want it to be really complete (maybe you've just missed these): annotation for block (only block parameter is annotated), and mayhaps definition of unary/binary message? Peter On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Pavel Krivanek wrote: > Hi, > > for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax > postcard: > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_ > syntax_postcard.svg > > Cheers, > -- Pavel >
[Pharo-dev] Updated syntax postcard
Hi, for the Wikipedia article I prepared an updated version of Phar syntax postcard: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/Pharo_syntax_postcard.svg Cheers, -- Pavel
