Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Luc Fabresse
Congrats Sean!
and thanks Igor ;-)


#Luc


2013/12/3 Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com

 Yes, thank you.


 On 3 December 2013 05:57, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:

 Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).

 I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
 SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1



 -
 Cheers,
 Sean
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
 Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.




 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.



Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Igor Stasenko
i have no idea, but following is not related to what changes i did:

 ./pharo Pharo.image update --from-file=updates30.staged

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (MBUpdateDevCommand is Undeclared)

VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

MBAddDescriptionCommandTesttestExecute (MBAddDescriptionCommand is
Undeclared)

MBConfigurationInfoTesttestInitialization (ConfigurationOfVersionner
is Undeclared)

MBAbstractVersionInfocmdSetCurrentVersion
(MBSetCurrentVersionCommand is Undeclared)

MTProjectaddDependentProject:from:withVersion:loads:(repository is shadowed)




On 3 December 2013 10:17, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 You know what?
 It will not be integrated because apparently the monkey tagged it as
 invalid.

 I have no idea why. I hate this automatic down grading. May be we should
 have a different tags to make the difference
 between

 work needed = nothing was done or something but it was never in
 the state where we could think it should be integrated
 was integration ready = it was ready but something happen

 Stef



  Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).
 
  I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
  https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
  SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1
 
 
 
  -
  Cheers,
  Sean
  --
  View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
  Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.
 





-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Igor 

where do you get this information?
Because I see 

https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Issue-Validator/3549//artifact/validationReport.html
and it is different.

stef
On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 i have no idea, but following is not related to what changes i did:
 
  ./pharo Pharo.image update --from-file=updates30.staged
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared) 
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared) 
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared) 
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared) 
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (MBUpdateDevCommand is Undeclared) 
 
 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared) 
 
 MBAddDescriptionCommandTesttestExecute (MBAddDescriptionCommand is 
 Undeclared) 
 
 MBConfigurationInfoTesttestInitialization (ConfigurationOfVersionner is 
 Undeclared) 
 
 MBAbstractVersionInfocmdSetCurrentVersion (MBSetCurrentVersionCommand is 
 Undeclared) 
 
 MTProjectaddDependentProject:from:withVersion:loads:(repository is 
 shadowed)
 
 
 
 On 3 December 2013 10:17, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote:
 You know what?
 It will not be integrated because apparently the monkey tagged it as invalid.
 
 I have no idea why. I hate this automatic down grading. May be we should have 
 a different tags to make the difference
 between
 
 work needed = nothing was done or something but it was never in the 
 state where we could think it should be integrated
 was integration ready = it was ready but something happen
 
 Stef
 
 
 
  Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).
 
  I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
  https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
  SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1
 
 
 
  -
  Cheers,
  Sean
  --
  View this message in context: 
  http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
  Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.



Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Igor Stasenko
apparently i was looking at wrong place, and according to report there's
merge conflict.
why? because i merged everything before commit.



On 3 December 2013 12:09, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 Igor

 where do you get this information?
 Because I see

 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Issue-Validator/3549//artifact/validationReport.html
 and it is different.

 stef

 On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 i have no idea, but following is not related to what changes i did:

  ./pharo Pharo.image update --from-file=updates30.staged

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (MBUpdateDevCommand is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 MBAddDescriptionCommandTesttestExecute (MBAddDescriptionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MBConfigurationInfoTesttestInitialization (ConfigurationOfVersionner is 
 Undeclared)

 MBAbstractVersionInfocmdSetCurrentVersion (MBSetCurrentVersionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MTProjectaddDependentProject:from:withVersion:loads:(repository is shadowed)




 On 3 December 2013 10:17, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 You know what?
 It will not be integrated because apparently the monkey tagged it as
 invalid.

 I have no idea why. I hate this automatic down grading. May be we should
 have a different tags to make the difference
 between

 work needed = nothing was done or something but it was never in
 the state where we could think it should be integrated
 was integration ready = it was ready but something happen

 Stef



  Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).
 
  I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
  https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
  SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1
 
 
 
  -
  Cheers,
  Sean
  --
  View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
  Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.
 





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.





-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Igor Stasenko
Yes

protocol: private
anonymousSubclassInitElementType: aTypeName
create and initialize the anonymous subclass of me

| newSubclass |
newSubclass := self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf: NBExternalArray.
newSubclass initElementType: aTypeName.
^ newSubclass


vs

protocol: private
anonymousSubclassInitElementType: aTypeName
create and initialize the anonymous subclass of me

| newSubclass |
newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
we're not using 'self' to avoid wrong subclassing from anonymous
subclass
builder superclass: NBExternalArray ].
newSubclass initElementType: aTypeName.
^ newSubclass


And

protocol: class factory
getClassForType: aTypeName
Do not confuse.! This method answers an anonymous class,  a subclass
of NBExternalTypeValue,
which can be used for instantiation later i.e:

floatTypeClass := NBExternalTypeValue ofType: 'float'.

float  := floatTypeClass new.
float value: 1.5.
float value.



| newSubclass |
newSubclass := self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf:
NBExternalTypeValue.
newSubclass valueType: aTypeName.
^ newSubclass

vs

protocol: class factory
getClassForType: aTypeName
Do not confuse.! This method answers an anonymous class,  a subclass
of NBExternalTypeValue,
which can be used for instantiation later i.e:

floatTypeClass := NBTypeValue ofType: 'float'.

float  := floatTypeClass new.
float value: 1.5.
float value.



| newSubclass |
newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
we're not using 'self' to avoid wrong subclassing from anonymous
subclass 
builder superclass: NBExternalTypeValue ].
newSubclass initValueType: aTypeName.
^ newSubclass


To anyone who changed this, can i have some canonical protocol for creating
anonymous subclasses
without referring to fuzzy , vague and unknown (as to me)
AnonymousClassInstaller
or other strange globals?



On 3 December 2013 13:01, Benjamin benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.comwrote:

 I testify, there are 2 conflicts

 Ben

 On 03 Dec 2013, at 12:44, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 apparently i was looking at wrong place, and according to report there's
 merge conflict.
 why? because i merged everything before commit.



 On 3 December 2013 12:09, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 Igor

 where do you get this information?
 Because I see

 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Issue-Validator/3549//artifact/validationReport.html
 and it is different.

 stef

 On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 i have no idea, but following is not related to what changes i did:

  ./pharo Pharo.image update --from-file=updates30.staged

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (MBUpdateDevCommand is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 MBAddDescriptionCommandTesttestExecute (MBAddDescriptionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MBConfigurationInfoTesttestInitialization (ConfigurationOfVersionner is 
 Undeclared)

 MBAbstractVersionInfocmdSetCurrentVersion (MBSetCurrentVersionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MTProjectaddDependentProject:from:withVersion:loads:(repository is 
 shadowed)




 On 3 December 2013 10:17, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 You know what?
 It will not be integrated because apparently the monkey tagged it as
 invalid.

 I have no idea why. I hate this automatic down grading. May be we should
 have a different tags to make the difference
 between

 work needed = nothing was done or something but it was never in
 the state where we could think it should be integrated
 was integration ready = it was ready but something happen

 Stef



  Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).
 
  I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
  https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
  SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1
 
 
 
  -
  Cheers,
  Sean
  --
  View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
  Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com http://nabble.com/.
 





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.





-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
I'm ok to add some convenient methods to class installers.
just that I do not have time to do it right now, so be my guest :)

Esteban




On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes

 protocol: private
 anonymousSubclassInitElementType: aTypeName
 create and initialize the anonymous subclass of me

 | newSubclass |
 newSubclass := self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf: NBExternalArray.
 newSubclass initElementType: aTypeName.
 ^ newSubclass


 vs

 protocol: private
 anonymousSubclassInitElementType: aTypeName
 create and initialize the anonymous subclass of me

 | newSubclass |
 newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
 we're not using 'self' to avoid wrong subclassing from anonymous
 subclass
 builder superclass: NBExternalArray ].
 newSubclass initElementType: aTypeName.
 ^ newSubclass


 And

 protocol: class factory
 getClassForType: aTypeName
 Do not confuse.! This method answers an anonymous class,  a subclass
 of NBExternalTypeValue,
 which can be used for instantiation later i.e:

 floatTypeClass := NBExternalTypeValue ofType: 'float'.

 float  := floatTypeClass new.
 float value: 1.5.
 float value.

 

 | newSubclass |
 newSubclass := self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf:
 NBExternalTypeValue.
 newSubclass valueType: aTypeName.
 ^ newSubclass

 vs

 protocol: class factory
 getClassForType: aTypeName
 Do not confuse.! This method answers an anonymous class,  a subclass
 of NBExternalTypeValue,
 which can be used for instantiation later i.e:

 floatTypeClass := NBTypeValue ofType: 'float'.

 float  := floatTypeClass new.
 float value: 1.5.
 float value.

 

 | newSubclass |
 newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
 we're not using 'self' to avoid wrong subclassing from anonymous
 subclass 
 builder superclass: NBExternalTypeValue ].
 newSubclass initValueType: aTypeName.
 ^ newSubclass


 To anyone who changed this, can i have some canonical protocol for
 creating anonymous subclasses
 without referring to fuzzy , vague and unknown (as to me)
 AnonymousClassInstaller
 or other strange globals?



 On 3 December 2013 13:01, Benjamin 
 benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.comwrote:

 I testify, there are 2 conflicts

 Ben

 On 03 Dec 2013, at 12:44, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 apparently i was looking at wrong place, and according to report there's
 merge conflict.
 why? because i merged everything before commit.



 On 3 December 2013 12:09, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 Igor

 where do you get this information?
 Because I see

 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Issue-Validator/3549//artifact/validationReport.html
 and it is different.

 stef

 On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 i have no idea, but following is not related to what changes i did:

  ./pharo Pharo.image update --from-file=updates30.staged

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (MBUpdateDevCommand is Undeclared)

 VersionnerProjectToolBarupdate (update is Undeclared)

 MBAddDescriptionCommandTesttestExecute (MBAddDescriptionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MBConfigurationInfoTesttestInitialization (ConfigurationOfVersionner is 
 Undeclared)

 MBAbstractVersionInfocmdSetCurrentVersion (MBSetCurrentVersionCommand is 
 Undeclared)

 MTProjectaddDependentProject:from:withVersion:loads:(repository is 
 shadowed)




 On 3 December 2013 10:17, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.frwrote:

 You know what?
 It will not be integrated because apparently the monkey tagged it as
 invalid.

 I have no idea why. I hate this automatic down grading. May be we
 should have a different tags to make the difference
 between

 work needed = nothing was done or something but it was never in
 the state where we could think it should be integrated
 was integration ready = it was ready but something happen

 Stef



  Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).
 
  I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
  https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
  SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1
 
 
 
  -
  Cheers,
  Sean
  --
  View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
  Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com http://nabble.com/.
 





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.





 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.



Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Igor Stasenko
Yes, when we discussed this with Martin (for a first time on that topic, i
guess)
all i wanted is a convenience method to _just_ make anonymous subclass..
how long this expression could be?

it should be as long as:

myClass createAnonymousSubclass.


and what we have instead?

First:

self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf: NBExternalArray.

then

newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
   builder superclass: NBExternalArray ].


this is unacceptable.
Because imagine one day you would want to port such code, (not necessary
NB, but code which creates and
uses anonymous subclasses), which code for porter, would be easier to
understand how to port it if another dialect will miss any
AnonymousClassInstaller?

-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-03 Thread Igor Stasenko
so i added anotehr version of slice,
where i added 1 extra method to Class.
in inbox.
but there some missing methods in kernel.


On 3 December 2013 13:27, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes, when we discussed this with Martin (for a first time on that topic, i
 guess)
 all i wanted is a convenience method to _just_ make anonymous subclass..
 how long this expression could be?

 it should be as long as:

 myClass createAnonymousSubclass.


 and what we have instead?

 First:

 self classBuilder anonymousSubclassOf: NBExternalArray.

 then

 newSubclass := AnonymousClassInstaller make: [ :builder |
builder superclass: NBExternalArray ].


 this is unacceptable.
 Because imagine one day you would want to port such code, (not necessary
 NB, but code which creates and
 uses anonymous subclasses), which code for porter, would be easier to
 understand how to port it if another dialect will miss any
 AnonymousClassInstaller?

 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.




-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Stasenko
On 2 December 2013 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:

 I'm tearing my hair out wrapping FMOD! I finally isolated the Mac
 VM-crashing
 bug (works in Windows) to:

 The reason I suspect NB is that I made a simple Xcode C project which (I
 think) does the exact same thing, which works perfectly. I uploaded it to
 https://github.com/seandenigris/FMODExample .
 To use it, just change SOUND_FILE_PATH in main.c to the location of the
 included train whistle.mp3 file


From Pharo, however, it only works if the path to the mp3 is:
 - *exactly* /Volumes/NO NAME/Smalltalk/Working Images/Salty
 Dog/Sounds/train whistle.mp3. No other combination seems to work on my
 machine - even direct parents and subdirectories of that one! WTH!!
 - or apparently a path without spaces

 sound really as some bug.. and similar to system() call.
my versions is:
 - it could be that strings are expected to be 16-byte aligned
 - that there's some bug with converting to null-terminated C string



 The thing that has me scratching my head is that even with spaces it works
 from Xcode!

 To see the error from Pharo:

 1. Gofer it
 smalltalkhubUser: 'SeanDeNigris' project: 'FMOD';
 package: 'FMOD';
 load.

 2. Copy the FMOD Programmers API folder from the C Sample into the image
 folder.

 3. FmodLibrary exampleFmodStylePlaying: '/path/to/train whistle.mp3'.

 I'd relly appreciate Igor or another NB guru (if there is such a thing,
 lol) to take a look. I've spent days chasing this down, and I'm out of
 ideas... Thanks.



 -
 Cheers,
 Sean
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860.html
 Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.




-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
sound really as some bug.. and similar to system() call.
my versions is:
 - it could be that strings are expected to be 16-byte aligned
 - that there's some bug with converting to null-terminated C string

Great! It's be nice to get this and system calls working in one shot... how do 
we proceed? How do we test? I'm willing to help...







-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: 
http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726878.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Stasenko
nevermind, i think i found the cause.
(system call now is working)


On 3 December 2013 02:08, Igor Stasenko siguc...@gmail.com wrote:




 On 3 December 2013 00:32, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:

 sound really as some bug.. and similar to system() call.
 my versions is:
  - it could be that strings are expected to be 16-byte aligned
  - that there's some bug with converting to null-terminated C string


 Great! It's be nice to get this and system calls working in one shot...
 how do we proceed? How do we test? I'm willing to help...


 if there some bug, it must be in NBExternalString
 which responsible for marshalling strings.
 try to change the alignment for the pointer and see how it goes in

 reserveStackBytes: numBytesOrBlock andStoreAddrTo: aTemp

 because right now it aligns the total space to reserve on stack
 (amount to subtract from SP), but not SP itself
 alignment should use powers of 2 , of course.

  Cheers,
 Sean

 --
 View this message in context: Re: NativeBoost String Handling 
 Bug?http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726878.html

 Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list 
 archivehttp://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.htmlat 
 Nabble.com.



 --
 Best regards,
 Igor Stasenko.




-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Stasenko
Name: NativeBoost-Core-IgorStasenko.140
Name: NativeBoost-Tests-IgorStasenko.75

try and see if it works for you (and try syscall too, if yes then i think
we can finally close the bug entry).


P.S. thanks for being persistent on this one.


Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Sean P. DeNigris
Igor Stasenko wrote
 if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).

I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1



-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: 
http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: [Pharo-dev] NativeBoost String Handling Bug?

2013-12-02 Thread Igor Stasenko
Yes, thank you.


On 3 December 2013 05:57, Sean P. DeNigris s...@clipperadams.com wrote:

 Igor Stasenko wrote
  if yes then i think we can finally close the bug entry).

 I updated the issue and made your packages into a slice:
 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?7542
 SLICE-Issue-7542-NB-system-example-SeanDeNigris.1



 -
 Cheers,
 Sean
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://forum.world.st/NativeBoost-String-Handling-Bug-tp4726860p4726895.html
 Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
 Nabble.com.




-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.