[Pharo-dev] [ANN] Pharo Consortium New Academic Member: ÉTS Montréal
The Pharo Consortium is very happy to announce that ÉTS Montréal has joined the Consortium as an Academic Member. About - ÉTS Montréal: https://www.etsmtl.ca/en/Home - Pharo Consortium: http://consortium.pharo.org The goal of the Pharo Consortium is to allow companies and institutions to support the ongoing development and future of Pharo. Individuals can support Pharo via the Pharo Association: http://association.pharo.org
Re: [Pharo-dev] Short Survey about automatic deprecation rewrites
Done! On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 17:24 Martin Dias wrote: > Done, thanks! > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:18 PM ducasse wrote: > >> Thanks! >> Martin milton juraj should do it too :) >> >> S. >> >> On 21 Jan 2020, at 21:34, Alexandre Bergel >> wrote: >> >> >> *From: *Alexandre Bergel >> *Subject: **Re: [Pharo-dev] Short Survey about automatic deprecation >> rewrites* >> *Date: *21 January 2020 at 21:34:58 CET >> *To: *Pharo Development List >> *Cc: *Any question about pharo is welcome >> >> >> Just answered! >> >> Alexandre >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> On 21-01-2020, at 13:23, Guillermo Polito >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> We would like to share with you a short survey about the automatic >> deprecation rewrites that have been around since Pharo 6. >> It will be super useful for us to enhance the support for migrations. >> We estimate it will take ~< 3 minutes to fill. >> >> This survey is aimed at people both *using* Pharo, or writing libraries >> and frameworks for Pharo. >> If you’re a library/framework maintainer and you know people using your >> library, would you mind share it with them? >> >> Link to the survey: https://sondages.inria.fr/index.php/133442?lang=en >> >> Thanks a lot! >> Guille, in behalf of the Pharo consortium >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Sent from the past
[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #23: 5571-testDefaultImageDoesNotStoreAnySetting-failing-in-Pharo9-on-CI-all-plattforms
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #23 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5572 was integrated: "5571-testDefaultImageDoesNotStoreAnySetting-failing-in-Pharo9-on-CI-all-plattforms" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5572 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5571 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/23/
[Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
How do we update https://files.pharo.org/image/80/stable-64.zip? The "emergency evaluator on warning" issue [1] is fixed, but Launcher is still serving a pre-fix image under "Official distributions". This seems like a critical issue as new users may be immediately put off. FYI as a workaround select the latest snapshot from the "Pharo 8.0" build templates further down in the tree. 1. https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5545 - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #25: Renraku Rules Profiles for Beginners - fixes: #5536
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #25 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5537 was integrated: "Renraku Rules Profiles for Beginners - fixes: #5536" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5537 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/CreateRenrakuRulesProfiles Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/25/
Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo9.x?
We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well: https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.package/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.class/instance/setUpPharo5AndGreaterPackages..st On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse wrote: > Hi > > I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we > should not > add pharo9.x to a list somewhere. > > S. > > > > >
[Pharo-dev] pharo9.x?
Hi I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we should not add pharo9.x to a list somewhere. S.
Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
EstebanLM wrote > Done I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 (bbcdf97). Is there another step? - Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html
Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
Done > On 24 Jan 2020, at 17:57, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > How do we update https://files.pharo.org/image/80/stable-64.zip? > > The "emergency evaluator on warning" issue [1] is fixed, but Launcher is > still serving a pre-fix image under "Official distributions". This seems > like a critical issue as new users may be immediately put off. FYI as a > workaround select the latest snapshot from the "Pharo 8.0" build templates > further down in the tree. > > 1. https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5545 > > > > - > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >
Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
thanks esteban. We should take the time to bullet proof our process. S. > On 25 Jan 2020, at 08:33, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > Mmm. There is an error in the CI and it did not uploaded the stable*.zip > archives (while it did the latest). > I uploaded them by hand but we need to review the process (problem is now I > cannot test it in my machine anymore, I need to prepare an environment) > >> On 25 Jan 2020, at 07:30, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >> Which url? >> I don’t know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the >> correct version. >> >> but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 >> while it should show 8.0.1. >> >> Esteban >> >>> On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >>> >>> EstebanLM wrote Done >>> >>> I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 >>> (bbcdf97). Is there another step? >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Cheers, >>> Sean >>> -- >>> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >>> >> > >
[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 9.0] Build #24: 5562-Executing-All-Instances-in-the-startup-affects-loading-times
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #24 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #5569 was integrated: "5562-Executing-All-Instances-in-the-startup-affects-loading-times" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/5569 Issue Url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/5562 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%20and%20branch%20Pipeline/job/Pharo9.0/24/
Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
Which url? I don’t know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the correct version. but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 while it should show 8.0.1. Esteban > On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: > > EstebanLM wrote >> Done > > I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 > (bbcdf97). Is there another step? > > > > - > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >
Re: [Pharo-dev] URGENT: Pharo 8 Needs Stable Version Update
Mmm. There is an error in the CI and it did not uploaded the stable*.zip archives (while it did the latest). I uploaded them by hand but we need to review the process (problem is now I cannot test it in my machine anymore, I need to prepare an environment) > On 25 Jan 2020, at 07:30, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > Which url? > I don’t know well how pharo launcher works, but zeroconf is downloading the > correct version. > > but there is a bug somewhere and the naming/versioning still shows 8.0.0 > while it should show 8.0.1. > > Esteban > >> On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:31, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> >> EstebanLM wrote >>> Done >> >> I see the new 8.0.1 release tag, but the URL still downloads 8.0.0 >> (bbcdf97). Is there another step? >> >> >> >> - >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html >> >
Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo9.x?
Thanks.
For me I cannot get the phar9.x branch loading. I will investigate if I can
understand what is the problem
aselineOfCozy >> baseline: spec [
spec for: #'pharo8.x'
do: [
spec package: 'CozyCommon'.
spec package: 'CozyPharo8' with: [ spec requires:
#('CozyCommon') ]
].
spec for: #'pharo9.x'
do: [
spec package: 'CozyCommon'.
spec package: 'CozyIceberg'.
spec package: 'CozyTheme'.
spec package: 'CozyPharo9' with: [ spec requires:
#('CozyCommon') ]
].
]
> On 24 Jan 2020, at 22:50, Gabriel Cotelli wrote:
>
> We used #'pharo9.x' in smalltalkCI baseline and seems to work well:
>
> https://github.com/hpi-swa/smalltalkCI/blob/master/repository/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.package/BaselineOfSmalltalkCI.class/instance/setUpPharo5AndGreaterPackages..st
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:47 PM ducasse > wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to adapt some baselines to Pharo90 and I’m wondering if we
> should not
> add pharo9.x to a list somewhere.
>
> S.
>
>
>
>
