Re: [CamPhilEvents] MSC Speaker Recommendations 2021-2022

2021-06-07 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

A quick reminder to complete the form below by the end of *11th June (this
Friday) *to recommend speakers for next year's MSC programme:

https://forms.gle/c49kUmRgvfY83FF6A

Best wishes,
--
Alex Fisher, Paula Keller, and Ronja Griep
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc




On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 13:29, Moral Sciences Club 
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> We are writing to invite you to recommend speakers for next year’s Moral
> Sciences Club talks. You can do so by completing the following form, but if
> you have difficulty in doing so please do get in touch with us by email
> instead:
>
> https://forms.gle/c49kUmRgvfY83FF6A
>
> Please complete the form by the end of *11th June* if you would like your
> suggestion to be noted
>
> If you wish to put forward more than one speaker, please rank your
> preferences in descending order (highest-preference first).
>
> We would like to invite a diverse range of people to give talks, so do
> bear this in mind.
>
> We look forward to hearing from you, and we hope that you are all well.
>
> Best wishes,
> --
> Alex Fisher, Paula Keller, and Ronja Griep
> Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
> Faculty of Philosophy
> University of Cambridge
> msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
> http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
>
>
>
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] MSC Speaker Recommendations 2021-2022

2021-06-02 Thread Moral Sciences Club
 Dear all,

We are writing to invite you to recommend speakers for next year’s Moral
Sciences Club talks. You can do so by completing the following form, but if
you have difficulty in doing so please do get in touch with us by email
instead:

https://forms.gle/c49kUmRgvfY83FF6A

Please complete the form by the end of *11th June* if you would like your
suggestion to be noted

If you wish to put forward more than one speaker, please rank your
preferences in descending order (highest-preference first).

We would like to invite a diverse range of people to give talks, so do bear
this in mind.

We look forward to hearing from you, and we hope that you are all well.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Fisher, Paula Keller, and Ronja Griep
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] MSC Annual General Meeting

2021-05-24 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



We cordially invite all members of the MSC to attend the Annual General
Meeting (AGM), which will take place during (or right after) the MSC's next
session, this Tuesday, 25th May, from 2:30-4:15pm. As you will know from
the other emails, we meet via Zoom
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting
ID: 955 4494 3588).

The AGM shall approve Minutes of the last General Meeting and the Society’s
Accounts for the preceding year, elect the Executive Committee for the year
ahead and conduct such other business as is necessary; Candidates for
election to office shall be proposed and seconded by two other members.

During this year’s AGM, we are especially going to discuss and vote on
Matthew Kramer's motion *to keep the MSC online indefinitely*. If you are a
member of the MSC and you have views on that matter, we encourage you to
attend tomorrow's session of the MSC (which will also be the last session
during the academic year 2020/21).

Best wishes,
Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Nancy Cartwright at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-24 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 25th
May, from 2:30-4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Nancy Cartwright* (Durham, San Diego) who will be
presenting on *“**Causal models, causal principles and evidence for
singular causation”*. The abstract follows below.



*This talk begins with a catalogue of 'tried and true' kinds of evidence
normally adduced for singular causal claims and offers a poison example in
illustration. It then presents a type of model – a SCEM (Singular Causal
Equations Model) – that defends WHY these are evidence. Despite the
equations, the model is not technically difficult to understand: it is just
a generalisation to multi-valued variables of JL Mackie's theory that
causes are INUS conditions (insufficient but necessary parts of unnecessary
but sufficient conditions). I close with a discussion of Donald Davidson's
demand that singular causation be grounded in causal principles and a query
about the role middle-level principles might play here.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Nancy Cartwright at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 25th
May, from 2:30-4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Nancy Cartwright* (Durham, San Diego) who will be
presenting on *“**Causal models, causal principles and evidence for
singular causation”*. The handout is attached to this email; the abstract
follows below.



*This talk begins with a catalogue of 'tried and true' kinds of evidence
normally adduced for singular causal claims and offers a poison example in
illustration. It then presents a type of model – a SCEM (Singular Causal
Equations Model) – that defends WHY these are evidence. Despite the
equations, the model is not technically difficult to understand: it is just
a generalisation to multi-valued variables of JL Mackie's theory that
causes are INUS conditions (insufficient but necessary parts of unnecessary
but sufficient conditions). I close with a discussion of Donald Davidson's
demand that singular causation be grounded in causal principles and a query
about the role middle-level principles might play here.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Ralf Bader at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-17 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 18th
May, from 2:30-4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Ralf Bader* (Fribourg) who will be presenting on
*'Partial
Comparability'*. The abstract of the talk follows.



*This paper considers cases of partial comparability where various
dimensions of evaluation are taken to be not fully but only partially
comparable such that some but not all gains and losses on these dimensions
can be traded off against each other. It will be argued that these cases
are to be given an epistemic interpretation such that objectively there is
complete comparability that is only partially epistemically accessible to
us.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Ralf Bader at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-15 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 18th
May, from 2:30-4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Ralf Bader* (Fribourg) who will be presenting on
*'Partial
Comparability'*. The abstract of the talk follows.



*This paper considers cases of partial comparability where various
dimensions of evaluation are taken to be not fully but only partially
comparable such that some but not all gains and losses on these dimensions
can be traded off against each other. It will be argued that these cases
are to be given an epistemic interpretation such that objectively there is
complete comparability that is only partially epistemically accessible to
us.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Lucy McDonald at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 11th
May, from 2:30 - 4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Lucy McDonald* (St John's College, Cambridge) who
will be presenting on *‘**The Philosophy of Flirting’*. The abstract of the
talk follows.



*In this talk I will use tools from philosophy of language to develop an
account of flirting. Flirting, I argue, is a conversational game involving
presuppositions of intimacy (‘push’ moves) and playfully insincere blocking
manoeuvres (‘pull’ moves). Flirters seek to create intimacy, so they
presuppose that such intimacy already exists. They do this by performing
acts which would be impolite if intimacy were absent. Through processes of
accommodation, such intimacy becomes real. This account enhances our
understanding of a common social ritual, and it can also be deployed in
political and legal contexts to undermine sexual harassment apologism.*


Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Lucy McDonald at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-08 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 11th
May, from 2:30 - 4:15pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Lucy McDonald* (St John's College, Cambridge) who
will be presenting on *‘**The Philosophy of Flirting’*. The abstract of the
talk follows.



*In this talk I will use tools from philosophy of language to develop an
account of flirting. Flirting, I argue, is a conversational game involving
presuppositions of intimacy (‘push’ moves) and playfully insincere blocking
manoeuvres (‘pull’ moves). Flirters seek to create intimacy, so they
presuppose that such intimacy already exists. They do this by performing
acts which would be impolite if intimacy were absent. Through processes of
accommodation, such intimacy becomes real. This account enhances our
understanding of a common social ritual, and it can also be deployed in
political and legal contexts to undermine sexual harassment apologism.*


Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Joe Horton at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-05-04 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 4th
May, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome Joe Horton (UCL) who will be presenting on 'New and
Improvable Lives'. The abstract of the talk follows.



*According to weak utilitarianism, at least when other things are equal,
you should maximize the sum of well-being. This view has considerable
explanatory power, but it also has two implications that seem to me
implausible. First, it implies that, other things equal, it is wrong to
harm yourself, or even to deny yourself benefits. Second, it implies that,
other things equal, given the opportunity to create new happy people, it is
wrong not to. These implications can be avoided by accepting a
complaints-based alternative to weak utilitarianism. However,
complaints-based views face two decisive problems, originally noticed by
Jacob Ross. I here develop a view that avoids these problems while
retaining the advantages of complaints-based views.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Joe Horton at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-04-30 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 4th
May, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/95544943588 (Meeting ID: 955 4494 3588). We are
delighted to welcome *Joe Horton* (UCL) who will be presenting on *'New and
Improvable Lives'*. The abstract of the talk follows.



*According to weak utilitarianism, at least when other things are equal,
you should maximize the sum of well-being. This view has considerable
explanatory power, but it also has two implications that seem to me
implausible. First, it implies that, other things equal, it is wrong to
harm yourself, or even to deny yourself benefits. Second, it implies that,
other things equal, given the opportunity to create new happy people, it is
wrong not to. These implications can be avoided by accepting a
complaints-based alternative to weak utilitarianism. However,
complaints-based views face two decisive problems, originally noticed by
Jacob Ross. I here develop a view that avoids these problems while
retaining the advantages of complaints-based views.*



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Helen Frowe at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-03-15 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held *tomorrow*, 16th
March, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). This
week, we are delighted to welcome *Helen Frowe *(Stockholm) who will be
presenting on '*Refugee Discrimination and Offsetting the Costs of Rescue*'.
The abstract of the talk follows.



*Consider Refuge:*



*Refuge: Alice and Betty face equally grave harms in their own countries,
and can avoid these harms only by resettlement abroad. France is
considering whether to admit Alice or Betty. Alice speaks French and will
be able to work. Her contributions to the French economy will offset any
financial costs of her rescue. Betty does not speak French, will struggle
to learn, and will not be able to work. She will not offset the costs of
her rescue. *



*In this talk, I argue that, other things being equal, the French
government is morally required to take into account Alice’s ability to
offset the cost of her resettlement. I do not argue that France must
prioritise Alice’s admission over Betty’s. I argue that, in the absence of
countervailing non-financial costs, France must admit Alice and their doing
so has no bearing on whether they may exclude Betty. This is true even if
France has already met its refugee quota (in a sense to be explored) and
any further admissions are thus seemingly supererogatory. The financial
costs of resettling refugees who can offset the financial costs of their
admittance are illegitimate grounds for excluding those refugees. *



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Helen Frowe at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-03-12 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 16th
March, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). This
week, we are delighted to welcome *Helen Frowe *(Stockholm) who will be
presenting on '*Refugee Discrimination and Offsetting the Costs of Rescue*'.
The abstract of the talk follows.



*Consider Refuge:*



*Refuge: Alice and Betty face equally grave harms in their own countries,
and can avoid these harms only by resettlement abroad. France is
considering whether to admit Alice or Betty. Alice speaks French and will
be able to work. Her contributions to the French economy will offset any
financial costs of her rescue. Betty does not speak French, will struggle
to learn, and will not be able to work. She will not offset the costs of
her rescue. *



*In this talk, I argue that, other things being equal, the French
government is morally required to take into account Alice’s ability to
offset the cost of her resettlement. I do not argue that France must
prioritise Alice’s admission over Betty’s. I argue that, in the absence of
countervailing non-financial costs, France must admit Alice and their doing
so has no bearing on whether they may exclude Betty. This is true even if
France has already met its refugee quota (in a sense to be explored) and
any further admissions are thus seemingly supererogatory. The financial
costs of resettling refugees who can offset the financial costs of their
admittance are illegitimate grounds for excluding those refugees. *



Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Alexander Horne at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-03-08 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow, 9th
March, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). This
week, we are delighted to welcome our very own Alexander Horne (Trinity
College) who will be presenting on 'You can run, but you cannot hide:
social norms and social normativity'. The abstract of the talk follows.


*There are many stupid, inefficient and immoral social norms. As a result,
most people think we sometimes have no reason at all to do as they require.
But most people are wrong. Or so I will argue. I attempt to establish a
claim of a posteriori necessity regarding social norms’ reason-giving power
that follows from the best account of what they and we are like. My
argumentative strategy for establishing that conclusion is to show that the
relevant instrumental normativity is simply contingent on an agent’s
having any desires whatsoever, on the model of a universal hypothetical
imperative.*


Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Alexander Horne at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-03-04 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 9th
March, from 2:30-4:15 pm. We will be meeting over Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). This
week, we are delighted to welcome our very own Alexander Horne (Trinity
College) who will be presenting on 'You can run, but you cannot hide:
social norms and social normativity'. The abstract of the talk follows.


*There are many stupid, inefficient and immoral social norms. As a result,
most people think we sometimes have no reason at all to do as they require.
But most people are wrong. Or so I will argue. I attempt to establish a
claim of a posteriori necessity regarding social norms’ reason-giving power
that follows from the best account of what they and we are like. My
argumentative strategy for establishing that conclusion is to show that the
relevant instrumental normativity is simply contingent on an agent’s having
any desires whatsoever, on the model of a universal hypothetical
imperative.*


Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Cian Dorr at Moral Sciences Club

2021-03-01 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday, 2nd
March. As usual, we will be meeting from 2:30-4:15 pm, and you can join us
on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825).
This week, we are delighted to welcome Cian Dorr (NYU) who will be speaking
on "Plural Signification and Semantic Paradox", the abstract of which
follows.


*Suppose that Socrates is saying that not everything Socrates is saying is
true. (Perhaps he has forgotten who he is, sees someone else saying that
snow is black, and wrongly believes that that person is Socrates.) If
everything he is saying is true, then since one of the things he’s saying
is that not everything he is saying is true, one of the things he’s saying
is false: a contradiction. So, not everything he’s saying is true. But then
one of the things he’s saying—namely, that not everything he’s saying is
true—is true. Therefore he is saying at least two things. This argument is
sometimes called “Prior’s Paradox”, after A.N. Prior who first formalized
it (though the argument was already implicitly endorsed by Bradwardine in
the 1320s). But there is nothing paradoxical about it, unless one
antecedently assumes that anyone uttering at most one sentence is thereby
saying at most one thing. Like Bradwardine, I will regard the argument as
an effective refutation of that assumption. Other “semantic paradoxes”,
like the Liar, likewise turn out under inspection simply to be sound
arguments for the one-many character of various other semantic
(intentional) relations. For example, we can argue that ‘This sentence
expresses something false’ expresses at least two things, namely something
false, and the truth that it expresses something false. In some closely
related cases, we can use a Berry-style argument to strengthen ‘at least
two’ to ‘infinitely many’. Such claims of multiplicity might seem costly if
they were thought of merely as escape routes to block paradox.  But they
make both intuitive and theoretical sense relative to a more general
"Plural Signification” picture which I will sketch, on which it is
characteristic of all “intentional” relations to be radically one-many. *

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Cian Dorr at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-26 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,


The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 2nd
March, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931
1816 3825). As usual, we will be meeting from 2:30-4:15 pm. This week, we
are delighted to welcome Cian Dorr (NYU) who will be speaking on "Plural
Signification and Semantic Paradox".


Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Alexander Bird at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-22 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow, Tuesday
23rd February, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting
ID: 931 1816 3825). *This week we will be returning to our regular time of
2:30-4:15 pm. *



We are delighted to welcome our very own Bertrand Russell Professor,
Alexander Bird (St John's College). Professor Bird will be giving a talk
entitled "Against Empiricism", the abstract of which follows:



*Most philosophers of science are empiricists.  Most philosophers of
science are realists.  But, I argue, it is not reasonable to be both an
empiricist and a realist.  Nor is instrumentalism a reasonable position.
So an empiricist should be an outright sceptic about science.  Conversely,
someone who wishes to have a positive attitude to at least some parts of
science, should not be an empiricist.  I conclude by pointing out that
scientific practice is inconsistent with empiricism.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


Re: [CamPhilEvents] Alexander Bird at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-19 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

Apologies, the Zoom link provided in our previous email was incorrect. You
can join us on Tuesday at* 2:30 pm* to listen to Professor Bird's talk
through https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816
3825). Again, apologies for any confusion this might have caused.

Best wishes,
Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc



On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 09:56, Moral Sciences Club 
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 23
> February, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/92022376494 (Meeting ID:
> 920 2237 6494). As many of you will know, last week we moved the meeting
> back two hours to accommodate our speakers. *This week we will be
> returning to our regular time of 2:30-4:15 pm. *
>
>
>
> We are delighted to welcome our very own Bertrand Russell Professor,
> Alexander Bird (St John's College). Professor Bird will be giving a talk
> entitled "Against Empiricism", the abstract of which follows:
>
>
>
> *Most philosophers of science are empiricists.  Most philosophers of
> science are realists.  But, I argue, it is not reasonable to be both an
> empiricist and a realist.  Nor is instrumentalism a reasonable position.
> So an empiricist should be an outright sceptic about science.  Conversely,
> someone who wishes to have a positive attitude to at least some parts of
> science, should not be an empiricist.  I conclude by pointing out that
> scientific practice is inconsistent with empiricism.*
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter
> --
> Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
> Cohen
> Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
> Faculty of Philosophy
> University of Cambridge
> msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
> http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
>
>
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Alexander Bird at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-18 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 23
February, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/92022376494 (Meeting ID: 920
2237 6494). As many of you will know, last week we moved the meeting back
two hours to accommodate our speakers. *This week we will be returning to
our regular time of 2:30-4:15 pm. *



We are delighted to welcome our very own Bertrand Russell Professor,
Alexander Bird (St John's College). Professor Bird will be giving a talk
entitled "Against Empiricism", the abstract of which follows:



*Most philosophers of science are empiricists.  Most philosophers of
science are realists.  But, I argue, it is not reasonable to be both an
empiricist and a realist.  Nor is instrumentalism a reasonable position.
So an empiricist should be an outright sceptic about science.  Conversely,
someone who wishes to have a positive attitude to at least some parts of
science, should not be an empiricist.  I conclude by pointing out that
scientific practice is inconsistent with empiricism.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Changed Time: Plunkett and McPherson at the MSC

2021-02-15 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 16
February, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/92022376494 (Meeting ID: 920
2237 6494). *Due to time zone issues, the meeting will take place from 4:30
until 6:15pm – two hours later than usual.*



We are delighted to welcome David Plunkett (Dartmouth) and Tristram
McPherson (Ohio State), who will be giving a talk entitled "Topic
Continuity in Conceptual Ethics and Beyond". The abstract for the talk is
as follows:



*One important activity in conceptual ethics and conceptual engineering
involves proposing to associate a new intension with an existing lexical
item. Many philosophers think that one important way to evaluate such a
proposal concerns whether it preserves the “topic” picked out the existing
lexical item, and several have offered competing proposals concerning what
is required for topic continuity. Our paper does two things. First, we
distinguish the descriptive question of what is required for “topic
continuity” as we currently understand it, from the conceptual ethics
question of how it would be best for conceptual ethicists to use ‘topic
continuity’ in evaluating their projects. Second, we motivate and provide a
context-sensitive answer to the conceptual ethics question. This answer is
motivated by the idea that there are several distinct considerations that
we can care about in thinking about topic continuity, and how best to weigh
them against each other can vary from context to context. We conclude by
locating our account in a broader way of thinking about topic across a
range of inquiries.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Changed Time: Plunkett and McPherson at the MSC

2021-02-11 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 16
February, on Zoom: https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/92022376494 (Meeting ID: 920
2237 6494). *Due to time zone issues, the meeting will take place from 4:30
until 6:15pm – two hours later than usual.*



We are delighted to welcome David Plunkett (Dartmouth) and Tristram
McPherson (Ohio State), who will be giving a talk entitled "Topic
Continuity in Conceptual Ethics and Beyond". The abstract for the talk is
as follows:



*One important activity in conceptual ethics and conceptual engineering
involves proposing to associate a new intension with an existing lexical
item. Many philosophers think that one important way to evaluate such a
proposal concerns whether it preserves the “topic” picked out the existing
lexical item, and several have offered competing proposals concerning what
is required for topic continuity. Our paper does two things. First, we
distinguish the descriptive question of what is required for “topic
continuity” as we currently understand it, from the conceptual ethics
question of how it would be best for conceptual ethicists to use ‘topic
continuity’ in evaluating their projects. Second, we motivate and provide a
context-sensitive answer to the conceptual ethics question. This answer is
motivated by the idea that there are several distinct considerations that
we can care about in thinking about topic continuity, and how best to weigh
them against each other can vary from context to context. We conclude by
locating our account in a broader way of thinking about topic across a
range of inquiries.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Justin Snedegar at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-08 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 9
February, from 2:30 until 4:15 pm, on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). We are
delighted to welcome Justin Snedegar (St Andrews), who will be giving a
talk entitled "Dismissing Blame". The abstract for the talk is as follows:



*When someone blames you, you might accept the blame or you might reject
it, challenging the blamer’s interpretation of the facts, or providing a
justification or excuse. Either way, there are opportunities for edifying
moral discussion and moral repair. But another common response is to simply
dismiss the blame, refusing to engage with the blamer even by rejecting the
blame. This talk aims to make sense of this kind of response: what are we
doing, when we dismiss blame? This is important for understanding when and
why such a response is or is not legitimate, and should shed light on
questions both about blame itself and about the standing to blame. My
answer is that when we dismiss blame, we dismiss a demand or expectation
that we lower ourselves before the blamer.*


Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Justin Snedegar at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-05 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 9
February, from 2:30 until 4:15 pm, on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). We are
delighted to welcome Justin Snedegar (St Andrews), who will be giving a
talk entitled "Dismissing Blame". The abstract for the talk is as follows:



*When someone blames you, you might accept the blame or you might reject
it, challenging the blamer’s interpretation of the facts, or providing a
justification or excuse. Either way, there are opportunities for edifying
moral discussion and moral repair. But another common response is to simply
dismiss the blame, refusing to engage with the blamer even by rejecting the
blame. This talk aims to make sense of this kind of response: what are we
doing, when we dismiss blame? This is important for understanding when and
why such a response is or is not legitimate, and should shed light on
questions both about blame itself and about the standing to blame. My
answer is that when we dismiss blame, we dismiss a demand or expectation
that we lower ourselves before the blamer.*


Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Lucy Allais at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-02-01 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 2
February, from 2:30 until 4:15 pm, on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). We are
delighted to welcome Lucy Allais (San Diego/Johannesburg), who will be
giving a talk entitled "Property, Market and Freedom". The abstract for the
talk is as follows:



*Kant’s political philosophy is based on freedom; and it opens with an
account of property. What is the relation between these? Is the right to do
what you want with your property a fundamental freedom that can be limited
only by other people’s equal freedom? Or do the exclusions involved in
defending private property involve a fundamental unfreedom of some? There
is debate in the literature about whether a political philosophy based on
defending and enabling equal external freedom rather than on meeting needs
would support redistributive taxation and market regulation. My aim in this
paper is to investigate the relation between freedom, property and economic
justice in Kant’s political philosophy by thinking about the relation
between external freedom, property and so-called free markets. Liberalism
is associated with ‘free’ markets, but what conception of free markets
follows from a Kantian account? What is it for markets to be free? My
argumentative strategy is reconstructive not primarily based on claims made
in Kant’s texts directly about markets and the economy (of which there are
very few), and many of the issue I discuss with respect to markets are
contemporary concerns. But my aim is to explore what follows from Kant’s
political philosophy for how we should think about markets. As is well
known, the Doctrine of Right is very sketchy, leaving much work for us to
do in working out what follows from the account. My approach is influenced
by Charles Mills’ critique of ideal theory, as well as his ‘occupy
liberalism’ approach to rethinking liberalism, though my focus (unlike his)
is on Kant’s political philosophy. My interest is in theorizing non-ideal
concerns specifically in relation to property and markets in Kant’s account
of justice. I argue that, in Kant’s account, voluntary market exchange of
property is something that must be thought of as depending on and being
subordinate to the framework of civic equality, rather than something
fundamental which drives what civic equality is and constrains it. I argue
that this has implications for the responsibility of the state to manage
natural resources, including those that affect the climate.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter

--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Lucy Allais at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-01-29 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 2
February, from 2:30 until 4:15pm, on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). We are
delighted to welcome Lucy Allais (San Diego/Johannesburg), who will be
giving a talk entitled "Property, Market and Freedom". The abstract for the
talk is as follows:



*Kant’s political philosophy is based on freedom; and it opens with an
account of property. What is the relation between these? Is the right to do
what you want with your property a fundamental freedom that can be limited
only by other people’s equal freedom? Or do the exclusions involved in
defending private property involve a fundamental unfreedom of some? There
is debate in the literature about whether a political philosophy based on
defending and enabling equal external freedom rather than on meeting needs
would support redistributive taxation and market regulation. My aim in this
paper is to investigate the relation between freedom, property and economic
justice in Kant’s political philosophy by thinking about the relation
between external freedom, property and so-called free markets. Liberalism
is associated with ‘free’ markets, but what conception of free markets
follows from a Kantian account? What is it for markets to be free? My
argumentative strategy is reconstructive not primarily based on claims made
in Kant’s texts directly about markets and the economy (of which there are
very few), and many of the issue I discuss with respect to markets are
contemporary concerns. But my aim is to explore what follows from Kant’s
political philosophy for how we should think about markets. As is well
known, the Doctrine of Right is very sketchy, leaving much work for us to
do in working out what follows from the account. My approach is influenced
by Charles Mills’ critique of ideal theory, as well as his ‘occupy
liberalism’ approach to rethinking liberalism, though my focus (unlike his)
is on Kant’s political philosophy. My interest is in theorizing non-ideal
concerns specifically in relation to property and markets in Kant’s account
of justice. I argue that, in Kant’s account, voluntary market exchange of
property is something that must be thought of as depending on and being
subordinate to the framework of civic equality, rather than something
fundamental which drives what civic equality is and constrains it. I argue
that this has implications for the responsibility of the state to manage
natural resources, including those that affect the climate.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Zoe Walker at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-01-25 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held this Tuesday, 26
January, from 2:30 until 4:15, on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825). We are
delighted to welcome Zoe Walker (Cambridge), who will be giving a talk
entitled 'A Sensibility of Humour'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:



*Some say that only a sexist can be amused by a sexist joke. Others think
that your sense of humour reveals nothing about you at all, and it’s
perfectly fine to enjoy whatever humour you like. In this paper, I forge a
path between these views, arguing that your sense of humour reveals nothing
about your beliefs, but does nonetheless reveal something else important
about your character. I arrive at this position by fleshing out an account
of sense of humour as a sensibility, with emotional, perceptual and
motivational aspects to it. I also propose a method for improving one’s
sense of humour if one finds it to be wanting.*



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Zoe Walker at the Moral Sciences Club

2021-01-22 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday, 26
January. We are delighted to welcome Zoe Walker (Cambridge), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'A Sensibility of Humour'. The abstract for the talk
is as follows:



Some say that only a sexist can be amused by a sexist joke. Others think
that your sense of humour reveals nothing about you at all, and it’s
perfectly fine to enjoy whatever humour you like. In this paper, I forge a
path between these views, arguing that your sense of humour reveals nothing
about your beliefs, but does nonetheless reveal something else important
about your character. I arrive at this position by fleshing out an account
of sense of humour as a sensibility, with emotional, perceptual and
motivational aspects to it. I also propose a method for improving one’s
sense of humour if one finds it to be wanting.



The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://cam-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/93118163825 (Meeting ID: 931 1816 3825).



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Lisa Bortolotti at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-30 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,
The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held Tomorrow (1st
December). We are delighted to welcome Lisa Bortolotti (Birmingham), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Delusion and Identity'. The abstract for
the talk is as follows:

In this paper I ask whether there is a definition of delusion which
encompasses how the word ‘delusion’ is used in lay talk, where delusions
are implausible or mistaken beliefs, and how ‘delusion’ is used in
psychiatry, where delusions are symptoms of mental disorders. Using a
variety of examples, I show that often talked-about features of
delusions—such as being false, bizarre, or pathological—should not be
regarded as defining features because they are not necessary conditions for
a belief to be delusional. Next, I propose a unified notion of delusion as
a belief that is irresponsive to counter-evidence and central to a person’s
identity.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Lisa Bortolotti at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-26 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (1st
December). We are delighted to welcome Lisa Bortolotti (Birmingham), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Delusion and Identity'. The abstract for
the talk is as follows:

In this paper I ask whether there is a definition of delusion which
encompasses how the word ‘delusion’ is used in lay talk, where delusions
are implausible or mistaken beliefs, and how ‘delusion’ is used in
psychiatry, where delusions are symptoms of mental disorders. Using a
variety of examples, I show that often talked-about features of
delusions—such as being false, bizarre, or pathological—should not be
regarded as defining features because they are not necessary conditions for
a belief to be delusional. Next, I propose a unified notion of delusion as
a belief that is irresponsive to counter-evidence and central to a person’s
identity.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.



--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Caspar Hare at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-23 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,
The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (24th
November). We are delighted to welcome Caspar Hare (MIT), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Pleasing the Crowd Within'. The abstract for the
talk is as follows:

Some metaphysicians tell us that in the near vicinity of every person there
are many further person-like things, with slightly different mereological,
temporal or modal properties. So, for example, in the near vicinity of
David Attenborough there is Hairless David Attenborough. Hairless David
Attenborough is just like David Attenborough except in this respect: David
Attenborough’s hair is part of David Attenborough, but not part of Hairless
David Attenborough. Suppose they are right. Does this have any bearing on
what we ought to believe and do in ordinary contexts? I say it does, though
not for the reasons you might think.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Caspar Hare at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,
The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (24th
November). We are delighted to welcome Caspar Hare (MIT), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Pleasing the Crowd Within'. The abstract will be
sent within the following few days.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Hartry Field at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-16 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tomorrow
(17th November). We are delighted to welcome Hartry Field (NYU), who will
be giving a talk entitled 'Naive Properties'. The abstract for the talk is
as follows:

Naive property theory consists of (1) an Abstraction Principle, asserting
the existence of each property definable (from parameters) in the
property-theoretic language; (2) an Instantiation Principle, making the
obvious generalization of the claim that (necessarily) the property of not
being an electron is satisfied by just those things that aren’t electrons;
and perhaps (3) an Identity Principle, which takes necessary
coextensiveness as sufficing for identity of properties. (3) seems less
obvious than the others, but in any case, (1) and (2) by themselves lead to
contradiction in classical logic.

A classical logician is likely to follow the lead of the standard
resolution of the set-theoretic paradoxes, by weakening (1). This is highly
problematic, and I tentatively suggest that weakening (2) is the better
option for the proponent of classical logic. But I prefer keeping both (1)
and (2), in a non-classical setting. This allows us to also come very close
to keeping (3), if we want it.

There’s much prior work allowing us to keep (1) and (2) in a non-classical
setting, but until recently, only in logically weak languages. Gilmore and
Kripke did it for a language without well-behaved conditionals, and without
restricted quantifiers, in a logic with a 3-valued semantics. Skolem and
Chang did it for a language that did include a well behaved conditional,
but without any quantifiers at all, in a logic with a continuum-valued
semantics. Both theories are very attractive in their limited domains, and
they agree where they overlap, so it’s natural to try for a common
generalization of both. In this talk I’ll show how to achieve that. (My
previous published work generalized only Gilmore-Kripke, not Skolem-Chang,
and gave a less tractable theory.)

I’ll include some discussion of two different kinds of conditionals:
ordinary indicative conditionals and quantifier-restricting conditionals.
We ultimately need a theory of both, and of how they interact, in a
framework suitable for the paradoxes. There won’t be time for the details,
but I’ll try to hit some key points about how this goes.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Hartry Field at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-13 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (17th
November). We are delighted to welcome Hartry Field (NYU), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Naive Properties'. The abstract for the talk is as
follows:

Naive property theory consists of (1) an Abstraction Principle, asserting
the existence of each property definable (from parameters) in the
property-theoretic language; (2) an Instantiation Principle, making the
obvious generalization of the claim that (necessarily) the property of not
being an electron is satisfied by just those things that aren’t electrons;
and perhaps (3) an Identity Principle, which takes necessary
coextensiveness as sufficing for identity of properties. (3) seems less
obvious than the others, but in any case, (1) and (2) by themselves lead to
contradiction in classical logic.

A classical logician is likely to follow the lead of the standard
resolution of the set-theoretic paradoxes, by weakening (1). This is highly
problematic, and I tentatively suggest that weakening (2) is the better
option for the proponent of classical logic. But I prefer keeping both (1)
and (2), in a non-classical setting. This allows us to also come very close
to keeping (3), if we want it.

There’s much prior work allowing us to keep (1) and (2) in a non-classical
setting, but until recently, only in logically weak languages. Gilmore and
Kripke did it for a language without well-behaved conditionals, and without
restricted quantifiers, in a logic with a 3-valued semantics. Skolem and
Chang did it for a language that did include a well behaved conditional,
but without any quantifiers at all, in a logic with a continuum-valued
semantics. Both theories are very attractive in their limited domains, and
they agree where they overlap, so it’s natural to try for a common
generalization of both. In this talk I’ll show how to achieve that. (My
previous published work generalized only Gilmore-Kripke, not Skolem-Chang,
and gave a less tractable theory.)

I’ll include some discussion of two different kinds of conditionals:
ordinary indicative conditionals and quantifier-restricting conditionals.
We ultimately need a theory of both, and of how they interact, in a
framework suitable for the paradoxes. There won’t be time for the details,
but I’ll try to hit some key points about how this goes.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.


--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Handout for Roxane Noël's presentation

2020-11-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The handout for Roxane Noël's presentation is attached. The same handout
will be shared via the Zoom chat.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter.
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Handout for Roxane Noël's talk today

2020-11-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

Attached to this email is the handout for Roxane Noël's talk today. It will
also be shared via the Zoom chat.

Best wishes,

Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Roxane Noël at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-09 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held Tomorrow (10th
November). We are delighted to welcome Roxane Noël (Cambridge), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Say It like You Mean It: An Investigation of
Abelard’s Legacy in Twelfth-Century Logic'. The abstract for the talk is as
follows:

The problem of universals is often seen as one of the central issues in
medieval philosophy, opposing nominalists to realists. This talk is part of
a broader project aiming to shed more light on nominalism after Abelard’s
death, i.e. in the second half of the twelfth century. Here, I focus on the
use of the technical notion of ‘*sermo*’ in two texts from this
period, the *Summa
Dialectice Artis* and the anonymous commentary on the Categories from Ms
Oxford Bodleian Library D’Orville 207, to show how these texts can be
linked to Abelardian thought, and what it means for the history of
nominalism.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Roxane Noël at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-04 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (10th
November). We are delighted to welcome Roxane Noël (Cambridge), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Say It like You Mean It: An Investigation of
Abelard’s Legacy in Twelfth-Century Logic'. The abstract for the talk is as
follows:

The problem of universals is often seen as one of the central issues in
medieval philosophy, opposing nominalists to realists. This talk is part of
a broader project aiming to shed more light on nominalism after Abelard’s
death, i.e. in the second half of the twelfth century. Here, I focus on the
use of the technical notion of ‘*sermo*’ in two texts from this
period, the *Summa
Dialectice Artis* and the anonymous commentary on the Categories from Ms
Oxford Bodleian Library D’Orville 207, to show how these texts can be
linked to Abelardian thought, and what it means for the history of
nominalism.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom: https:/
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455>/zoom.us/j/98343588455
<https://zoom.us/j/98343588455> (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Stephen Yablo at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-11-02 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (3rd
November). We are delighted to welcome Professor Stephen Yablo (MIT), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'How and Why to be Logically
Non-Omniscient'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Some ideas from aboutness theory are applied to the problem of logical
omniscience. The goal is less to excuse our failure to draw certain
(valid)  inferences than to explain the failure, to the point in some cases
of applauding it.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Stephen Yablo at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-10-28 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (3rd
November). We are delighted to welcome Professor Stephen Yablo (MIT), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'How and Why to be Logically
Non-Omniscient'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Some ideas from aboutness theory are applied to the problem of logical
omniscience. The goal is less to excuse our failure to draw certain
(valid)  inferences than to explain the failure, to the point in some cases
of applauding it.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Handout for Sally Haslanger's presentation

2020-10-27 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held today. For
Professor Haslanger's talk there will be a handout, which is attached to
this email. The same handout will be shared via the Zoom chat. Her paper on
which the talk is based is also attached.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Sally Haslanger at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-10-21 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (27th
October). We are delighted to welcome Professor Sally Haslanger (MIT), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Political Epistemology and Social
Critique'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Under conditions of ideology, a standard model of normative political
epistemology – relying on a domain-specific reflective equilibrium – risks
status-quo bias. Social critique requires a more critical standpoint. What
are the aims of social critique? How is such a standpoint achieved and what
grounds its claims?  One way of achieving a critical standpoint is through
consciousness raising. Consciousness raising offers a paradigm shift in our
understanding of the social world; but not all epistemic practices that
appear to “raise” consciousness, are warranted. However, under certain
conditions sketched in the paper, consciousness raising produces a
warranted critical standpoint and a pro tanto claim against others. This is
an important epistemic achievement, yet under conditions of collective
self-governance, there is no guarantee that all warranted claims can be met
simultaneously. There will be winners and losers even after legitimate
democratic processes have been followed.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Amie Thomasson at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-10-19 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next tomorrow
(20th October). We are delighted to welcome Professor Amie Thomasson
(Dartmouth), who will be giving a talk entitled 'Should Ontology be
Explanatory?'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Since Quine, it has been common to hold that the goal of ontology is to
determine what entities we should or must ‘posit’ as part of a best total
explanatory theory. Accordingly, whether putative entities such as
meanings, properties, or numbers contribute explanatory power is often
taken as a central criterion for whether we should accept that they exist.*

*I will argue that this is a mistake. The explanatory power criterion
arises from failing to understand the diverse functions that different
areas of discourse can serve. A deeper understanding of the way these forms
of discourse enter language, and of the functional roles they play, makes
clear why we should reject the explanatory power criterion, and reject the
explanatory conception of ontology. I will close with some remarks about
how we should rethink our approach to existence questions—and, more deeply,
how we should re-focus our philosophical efforts.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter
--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Amie Thomasson at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-10-14 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (20th
October). We are delighted to welcome Professor Amie Thomasson (Dartmouth),
who will be giving a talk entitled 'Should Ontology be Explanatory?'. The
abstract for the talk is as follows:

*Since Quine, it has been common to hold that the goal of ontology is to
determine what entities we should or must ‘posit’ as part of a best total
explanatory theory. Accordingly, whether putative entities such as
meanings, properties, or numbers contribute explanatory power is often
taken as a central criterion for whether we should accept that they exist.*

*I will argue that this is a mistake. The explanatory power criterion
arises from failing to understand the diverse functions that different
areas of discourse can serve. A deeper understanding of the way these forms
of discourse enter language, and of the functional roles they play, makes
clear why we should reject the explanatory power criterion, and reject the
explanatory conception of ontology. I will close with some remarks about
how we should rethink our approach to existence questions—and, more deeply,
how we should re-focus our philosophical efforts.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter

--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Kwame Anthony Appiah at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-10-12 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (13th
October). We are delighted to welcome Kwame Anthony Appiah (NYU), who will
be giving a talk entitled 'The Philosophy of Work'. Here is the abstract
for his talk:

*A discussion of the changing ways in which work fits into the main ethical
project: making a life. Globalization and automation are seen as posing
challenges for many kinds of workers. What -- if anything -- can philosophy
say about the appropriate social response?*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 on Zoom:
https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983 4358 8455).

Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter

--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Kwame Anthony Appiah at the Moral Sciences Club and Club Programme 2020-21

2020-10-05 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The Moral Sciences Club is pleased to announce its programme of speakers
for 2020-21, details of which you can find attached to this email.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Club will have to hold its meetings
virtually for the foreseeable future. Whilst we are disappointed that this
means we will not be able to see you all in person, we are incredibly
excited about the opportunity this presents us with to host speakers from
around the world. We hope you are just as excited about the programme as we
are.

For our first meeting of the academic year, we are delighted to welcome
Professor Kwame Anthony Appiah (NYU) who will be speaking on 'The
Philosophy of Work', the abstract is as follows:

*A discussion of the changing ways in which work fits into the main ethical
project: making a life. Globalization and automation are seen as posing
challenges for many kinds of workers. What--if anything- can philosophy say
about the appropriate social response?*

The meeting will be held on the 13th October from 2:30 - 4:15pm BST, you
can join us on Zoom via: https://zoom.us/j/98343588455 (Meeting ID: 983
4358 8455).

With best wishes,
Chris, Emma, Sofía and Wouter

--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Recommendations for MSC Speakers

2020-08-01 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



This email is a reminder that today, 1st August, is the last day that
speakers can be recommended for next year’s Moral Sciences Club talks. You
can do so by filling in the following form:



https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/YS8ZTKQ?fbclid=IwAR208jplssB9InBGqm-ywyeKv6F6wPtiRH4lTH4cpVyGVsbqpqBgQ2hajJo


If you have any difficulty in completing the form do get in touch with us
by email. We look forward to hearing from you, and we hope that you are all
well.



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía, and Wouter



--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez, and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Recommendations for MSC Speakers

2020-07-17 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,



We are writing to invite you to recommend speakers for next year’s Moral
Sciences Club talks. You can do so by filling in the following form, but if
you have difficulty in completing the form do get in touch with us by email:



https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/YS8ZTKQ?fbclid=IwAR208jplssB9InBGqm-ywyeKv6F6wPtiRH4lTH4cpVyGVsbqpqBgQ2hajJo



Please fill the form in by *noon* of the *1st August*, if you would like
your suggestion to be noted. We look forward to hearing from you, and we
hope that you are all well.



Best wishes,

Christopher, Emma, Sofía and Wouter



--
Christopher Benzenberg, Emma Curran, Sofía Meléndez-Gutiérrez and Wouter
Cohen
Acting Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk  
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Moral Sciences Club - Easter meetings cancelled

2020-03-24 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,



We hope this finds you well.



We are writing to inform you that, regrettably, all meetings of the
Cambridge Moral Sciences Club in Easter term are cancelled due to
Coronavirus. We will discuss the possibility of re-inviting those speakers
whose talks will not go ahead with next year’s secretaries.



Kind Regards,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Cancelled - Moral Science Club 10 March

2020-03-06 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

Due to the ongoing UCU industrial action, next week's Moral Sciences Club
meeting (10 March) is cancelled. This decision has been made in discussion
with the speaker, Ruth Chang, who will be invited to speak next year.

Thank you for your understanding,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] UCU Strike and Moral Sciences Club

2020-02-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

In view of the upcoming UCU industrial action, next week's Moral Sciences
Club meeting (25th February) is cancelled. This decision has been made in
discussion with the speaker, Quill Kukla, who will be invited to speak next
year.

In light of this, we would like to make you aware of the MAP teach-out on
Monday 24th February (4-6pm in King's College Audit Room), at which Quill
Kukla will be speaking.

Thank you for your understanding,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Manuel Garcia-Carpintero at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-02-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

This is a reminder that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be
held tomorrow (11th February). We are delighted to welcome Manuel
Garcia-Carpintero (Barcelona), who will be giving a talk entitled 'Two
Views on Rule-Constituted Kinds'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

The paper distinguishes between two conceptions of kinds defined by
constitutive rules, the one suggested by Searle, and the one invoked by
Williamson to define assertion. Against recent arguments to the contrary by
Maitra, Johnson and others, it argues for the superiority of the latter as
an account of games. On this basis, the paper argues that the alleged
disanalogies between standard games and language games suggested in the
literature in fact don’t exist. The paper relies on Rawls’s distinction
between types (“blueprints”, as Rawls called them) of practices and
institutions defined by constitutive rules, and those among them that are
actually in force, and hence truly normative; it defends along Rawlsian
lines the plurality of norms applying to actual instances of
rule-constituted practices, and uses this fact to counter the plausible
examples that Maitra, Johnson and others provide to sustain their case.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday today. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk
and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to
the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Manuel Garcia-Carpintero at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-02-06 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (11th
February). We are delighted to welcome Manuel Garcia-Carpintero
(Barcelona), who will be giving a talk entitled 'Two Views on
Rule-Constituted Kinds'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

The paper distinguishes between two conceptions of kinds defined by
constitutive rules, the one suggested by Searle, and the one invoked by
Williamson to define assertion. Against recent arguments to the contrary by
Maitra, Johnson and others, it argues for the superiority of the latter as
an account of games. On this basis, the paper argues that the alleged
disanalogies between standard games and language games suggested in the
literature in fact don’t exist. The paper relies on Rawls’s distinction
between types (“blueprints”, as Rawls called them) of practices and
institutions defined by constitutive rules, and those among them that are
actually in force, and hence truly normative; it defends along Rawlsian
lines the plurality of norms applying to actual instances of
rule-constituted practices, and uses this fact to counter the plausible
examples that Maitra, Johnson and others provide to sustain their case.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 10th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Rachel Sterken at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-01-27 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

This is a reminder that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be
held tomorrow (28th January). We are delighted to welcome Rachel Sterken
(Oslo), who will be giving a talk entitled 'Authentic Speech'. The abstract
for the talk is as follows:

This talk provides an account of what it is to speak authentically.
Authentic speech is an under-explored topic: Philosophers of language have
produced theories of many different forms of speech, but authenticity has
been overlooked. This, I suggest, is a mistake: descriptions of speech as
authentic (or inauthentic) are ubiquitous and authenticity plays an
important role in many communicative exchanges. The talk has three main
parts: 1. I provide an account of authentic speech, 2. I show how it
differs from sincere speech, and 3. I argue that there are speech acts that
have authenticity conditions.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday today. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk
and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to
the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Rachel Sterken at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-01-24 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (28th
January). We are delighted to welcome Rachel Sterken (Oslo), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Authentic Speech'. The abstract for the talk is as
follows:

This talk provides an account of what it is to speak authentically.
Authentic speech is an under-explored topic: Philosophers of language have
produced theories of many different forms of speech, but authenticity has
been overlooked. This, I suggest, is a mistake: descriptions of speech as
authentic (or inauthentic) are ubiquitous and authenticity plays an
important role in many communicative exchanges. The talk has three main
parts: 1. I provide an account of authentic speech, 2. I show how it
differs from sincere speech, and 3. I argue that there are speech acts that
have authenticity conditions.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 27th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Miranda Fricker at the Moral Sciences Club

2020-01-16 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (21st
January). We are delighted to welcome Professor Miranda Fricker
(CUNY/Sheffield), who will be giving a talk entitled 'Williams'
Naturalistic Philosophy'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

A natural approach to interpreting Bernard Williams’ ethical philosophy is
to picture it as a web of inter-related commitments where no commitment has
unique priority. For in reading his work it is not easy to discern any
single commitment as prior to the rest. Despite this, and in an
experimental spirit, I will however venture an interpretation that does
present a single conviction as the fundamental philosophical motivation. At
the heart of Williams’ thought is a philosophical instinct for freedom
conceived as outstripping constraints of rationality, and it is this
instinct that expresses itself in each of the signature commitments of his
work.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 20th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Peter Millican at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-11-18 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (19th
November). We are delighted to welcome Professor Peter Millican (Oxford),
who will be giving a talk entitled 'What Hume Really Thought about
Causation'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

This paper has been written to round off a collection of my papers for OUP,
entitled *Hume on Causation and Free Will* (anticipated 2021). It brings
together work from the last two decades, including crucial elements as yet
unpublished, and aspires to provide a convincing overall account of Hume’s
settled views, in the light of various controversies treated in previously
published papers (e.g. regarding determinism, the two definitions, and the
“New Hume”). It starts from a well-evidenced summary of twelve “key points”
to which Hume is clearly committed, and then builds on these to address the
familiar interpretative debates (e.g. between reductionist, projectivist,
and sceptical realist readings). It sets out all the main features of
Hume’s theory as I interpret it, and highlights what I take to be the
decisive factors in the various debates, while delegating detailed
discussion to the earlier papers. A systematic summary and references will
be given in a handout, which aims to provide a convenient resource for
tutors or students aiming to find their way around this notoriously complex
interpretative terrain.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Peter Millican at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-11-14 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (19th
November). We are delighted to welcome Professor Peter Millican (Oxford),
who will be giving a talk entitled 'What Hume Really Thought about
Causation'. The abstract for the talk is as follows:

This paper has been written to round off a collection of my papers for OUP,
entitled *Hume on Causation and Free Will* (anticipated 2021). It brings
together work from the last two decades, including crucial elements as yet
unpublished, and aspires to provide a convincing overall account of Hume’s
settled views, in the light of various controversies treated in previously
published papers (e.g. regarding determinism, the two definitions, and the
“New Hume”). It starts from a well-evidenced summary of twelve “key points”
to which Hume is clearly committed, and then builds on these to address the
familiar interpretative debates (e.g. between reductionist, projectivist,
and sceptical realist readings). It sets out all the main features of
Hume’s theory as I interpret it, and highlights what I take to be the
decisive factors in the various debates, while delegating detailed
discussion to the earlier papers. A systematic summary and references will
be given in a handout, which aims to provide a convenient resource for
tutors or students aiming to find their way around this notoriously complex
interpretative terrain.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 18th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Kenny Walden at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-11-11 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (Tuesday
12 November). We are delighted to welcome Kenny Walden (Dartmouth), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Agency and Genius'. The abstract for the
talk is as follows.


The nature of agency places two demands on us, one of creativity and
another of intelligibility. But these demands are in tension: the most
straightforward ways of satisfying one clash with the other. I analogize
this tension to one that characterizes artistic production and suggest that
its resolution is found in the mysterious capacity that Kant calls "genius".


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday today. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk
and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to
the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Kenny Walden at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-11-08 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (12
November). We are delighted to welcome Kenny Walden (Dartmouth), who will
be giving a talk entitled 'Agency and Genius'.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in Sidgwick Hall at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 11th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Benjamin Marschall at the Moral Sciences Club - Please note the earlier than usual start time (2:00pm)

2019-10-31 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held next Tuesday (5
November). We are delighted to welcome Benjamin Marschall (Cambridge), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Carnap's Defence of Abstract Objects'. Here
is the abstract for his talk:

Abstract objects such as numbers are commonly thought to pose philosophical
problems, and have frequently been rejected on account of being
metaphysically dubious. According to Carnap this attitude is mistaken,
however, as even empiricists can happily accept abstracta – provided that
talk about them is understood as internal to a linguistic framework. In
this paper I explain what Carnap’s internalism amounts to, and argue that
it fails to work in full generality by combining two arguments by Gödel and
Beth.


The meeting will be held from 2:00pm until 3:45 in the Jane Harrison Room
at Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee. The earlier
than usual start time is to allow attendees who wish to do so time to make
their way to Elliott Sober's third Tarner Lecture in the Winstanley Lecture
Theatre, Trinity College, which commences at 4:00pm.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 4th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Luvell Anderson at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-10-21 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (Tuesday
22nd October). We are delighted to welcome Luvell Anderson (Syracuse), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Roasting Ethics'. The abstract is as
follows:

"What are the rules of the comedic roast? Initially, there might seem to be
a tension between ‘the comedic’ and ‘roasting’ or ‘insult.’ The comedic is
concerned with *the funny*, light-hearted mirth or fun, while insults are
mean-spirited in nature, tools of injury. So how can the two be combined to
produce something fun? Obviously, the mixing of the two isn’t always
successful. Just as adding too much salt to a dish can make it unpalatable,
being heavy-handed with the insults can make an intended humorous utterance
emotionally unbearable. There is a delicate balance that must be struck to
ensure that insults within the roasting context are taken “in good fun.” In
this talk I briefly entertain a few views that attempt a resolution of this
apparent tension. I conclude with a proposal that suggests when they are
succesful, roasts employ mechanisms that redirect attention from the joke’s
content to its formal properties; it is when those mechanisms fail that
roasting becomes disagreeable."

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday today. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk
and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to
the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Luvell Anderson at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-10-18 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 22nd
October. We are delighted to welcome Luvell Anderson (Syracuse), who will
be giving a talk entitled 'Roasting Ethics'. Abstract to follow.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 21st. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: https://lists.cam.ac.uk/pipermail/phil-events/

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Nick Denyer at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-10-14 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear All,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held tomorrow (Tuesday
15 October). We are delighted to welcome Nick Denyer (Cambridge), who will
be giving a talk entitled 'Euclid, Plato, and Aristotle on What Geometry is
About'. Here is the abstract for his talk:

Euclid’s *Elements* astonished and astonishes by its way of making claims
that are general (“in *every* triangle”) and exact (“the interior angles
sum to *two* right angles”), and then giving those claims rigorous proofs.
I look at the place in the *Elements* of the so-called ‘postulates’, in
which - as I will argue - Euclid invites us to imagine an idealised drawer
of geometrical diagrams, whom I will call ‘Valentina’. I will look at how
postulating Valentina helps Euclid solve a problem posed by Plato: what can
be the bearing of particular, temporary, and changing diagrams on general,
everlasting, and stable truths? In showing how Euclid’s solution works, I
borrow a lot from Aristotle. The key ideas are that we may identify the
existence of a geometrical object with the possibility of drawing such an
object, that we may prove it possible to draw an object by actually drawing
it, and that for this purpose drawing the object in our imagination can be
— if our imagination is suitably disciplined — as good as drawing it on the
board. Postulating Valentina turns out to be a marvellous way of
disciplining our imagination: imagining her to draw a geometrical object
will indeed show that the object can be drawn, and therefore that it exists
eternally.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 14th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Nick Denyer at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-10-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 15
October. We are delighted to welcome Nick Denyer (Cambridge), who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Euclid, Plato, and Aristotle on What Geometry is
About'. Here is the abstract for his talk:

Euclid’s *Elements* astonished and astonishes by its way of making claims
that are general (“in *every* triangle”) and exact (“the interior angles
sum to *two* right angles”), and then giving those claims rigorous proofs.
I look at the place in the *Elements* of the so-called ‘postulates’, in
which - as I will argue - Euclid invites us to imagine an idealised drawer
of geometrical diagrams, whom I will call ‘Valentina’. I will look at how
postulating Valentina helps Euclid solve a problem posed by Plato: what can
be the bearing of particular, temporary, and changing diagrams on general,
everlasting, and stable truths? In showing how Euclid’s solution works, I
borrow a lot from Aristotle. The key ideas are that we may identify the
existence of a geometrical object with the possibility of drawing such an
object, that we may prove it possible to draw an object by actually drawing
it, and that for this purpose drawing the object in our imagination can be
— if our imagination is suitably disciplined — as good as drawing it on the
board. Postulating Valentina turns out to be a marvellous way of
disciplining our imagination: imagining her to draw a geometrical object
will indeed show that the object can be drawn, and therefore that it exists
eternally.


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 14th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Moral Sciences Club Programme 2019/20

2019-10-03 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The Moral Sciences Club is pleased to announce its programme of speakers
for 2019/20, detailed below. (Please note that some titles are
provisional.)

All meetings will be held from 14:30 to 16:15 at Newnham College, followed
by tea and coffee and then dinner in the evening.

Michaelmas Term 2019

Date
Speaker (Institution)Title of TalkLocation
15th October Nick Denyer (Cambridge)

Euclid, Plato, and Aristotle on What Geometry is About

Jane Harrison Room
22nd October

Luvell Anderson (Syracuse)

Roasting Ethics

Jane Harrison Room
29th October

Robert Pasnau (CU Boulder)

Choosing between Faith and Heresy

Barbara White Room
5th November

Benjamin Marschall (Cambridge)

Carnap’s Defence of Abstract Objects

Jane Harrison Room
12th November

Kenny Walden (Dartmouth)
Agency and Genius

Sidgwick Hall
19th November

Peter Millican (Oxford)
What Hume Really Thought about Causation

 Sidgwick Hall
26th November

Lucy McDonald (Cambridge)
Catcalls and Accommodation

 Jane Harrison Room
3rd December

Justin Snedegar (St Andrews)

How Do Reasons Compete?
 Barbara White Room
Lent Term 2020

Date
Speaker (Institution)Title of TalkLocation
21st January

Miranda Fricker (CUNY)

Williams' Naturalistic Philosophy
Jane Harrison Room
28th January

Rachel Sterken (Oslo)
<http://sms.csx.cam.ac.uk/media/2911394>Authentic Speech Sidgwick Hall
4th February Robert Hopkins (NYU) Ryleing the Irreal: sensory imagining as
knowledge of perceiving Jane Harrison Room

11th February

Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (Barcelona)
The Metasemantics of Force-Indicators
<http://sms.csx.cam.ac.uk/media/2920142> Jane Harrison Room
18th February

Anne Bosse (Cambridge)
Generics in Use Jane Harrison Room
25th February

Rebecca Kukla (Georgetown)
TBD Jane Harrison Room
3rd March

Beatrice Han-Pile (Essex)

'The Doing is Everything': A Middle-Voiced Reading of Agency in Nietzsche
Jane Harrison Room
10th March

Ruth Chang (Oxford)
Hard Choices Jane Harrison RoomEaster Term 2020

Date
Speaker (Institution)Title of TalkLocation
28th April Anastasia Berg (Cambridge)

Desire: Between Action and Passion
Jane Harrison Room
5th May David Plunkett (Dartmouth)

Evaluation Turned on Itself: The Vindicatory Circularity Challenge to the
Conceptual Ethics of Normativity
Jane Harrison Room
12th May

Christopher Peacocke (Columbia)
Two Kinds of Explanation Jane Harrison Room
19th May

Ofra Magidor (Oxford)

<http://sms.csx.cam.ac.uk/media/2989768>TBD
Jane Harrison Room

For more information about the club, and any updates to titles, see
https://phil.cam.ac.uk/research/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
<https://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/research/seminars-phil/seminars-msc>.

We look forward to seeing you at Newnham.

Best wishes,
Alex, Roxane and Zoe
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Recommendations for MSC Speakers - Deadline Extended

2019-06-19 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

we have extended the deadline to submit recommendations for next year's
program to Monday 24 June.

Thank you to all those who have already submitted their recommendations.

For each recommendation, it would be helpful if you could also indicate the
area in which they work. If you're aware of potential speakers that are not
based in Europe, but who will be in the UK next year, feel free to include
them in your suggestions.

If you wish to put forward more than one speaker, please rank your
preferences.

We would like to invite a diverse range of people to give talks, so do bear
this in mind.

Best wishes,
--
Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Moral Sciences Club Photo

2019-06-11 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Hello everyone,

the Moral Sciences Club photo can now be ordered under
https://www.lafayettephotography.com/Default.aspx with the login code
*190521cms1* .

All the best,
--
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Recommendations for MSC Speakers

2019-06-03 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

We will soon begin inviting speakers for next year's Moral Sciences Club
talks. If you have any suggestions for speakers, please let us know by the
17th June. It would be helpful if you could also indicate the area in which
they work. If you're aware of potential speakers that are not based in
Europe, but who will be in the UK next year, feel free to include them in
your suggestions.

If you wish to put forward more than one speaker, please rank your
preferences.

We would like to invite a diverse range of people to give talks, so do bear
this in mind.

Best wishes,

Alex Horne, Roxane Noel and Zoe Walker
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Pekka Väyrynen + photograph and AGM at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-05-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the last meeting of the year will be held on
Tuesday 21st May. There will be the traditional annual photograph. The
photography for the annual Club photograph is due to start at 1.50 pm, *so
we ask that members who wish to be in the photograph meet at the gardens of
Newnham College by 1.40 pm.*  After the photograph and before the talk we
will hold the Annual General Meeting at 2.10 pm in the Jane Harrison Room,
Newnham.

For our last talk, we are delighted to welcome Pekka Väyrynen (Leeds) who
will be giving a talk entitled “Practical Commitment in Evaluative
Discourse”.  His abstract is as follows:

Evaluative and normative judgments play a distinctive practical role in our
thought. This paper concerns how their practical role is reflected in
language. It is widely assumed that at least those evaluative terms that
can be used to express “thin” evaluative concepts, such as ‘good’ and ‘ought’,
are associated with such practical roles somehow as a matter of meaning.
 But such semantic views are rarely given explicit defense or even
articulation. I first elucidate some different forms such views might take,
and identify a representative version as my target. I then argue that we
have reason to reject this view. Terms like ‘ought’ can be used, even in
normative contexts, to assert thin evaluative claims which don’t play the
term’s customary practical role. This gives us a choice: either offer some
plausible explanation of why the relevant practical features don’t show up in
these cases despite the role they are assigned in our semantic theory, or
else don’t build them into our semantic theory. I argue that plausible
semantic explanations don’t look particularly forthcoming. (In the full
paper I also outline what an alternative pragmatic account of how thin
evaluative terms are associated with their practical roles might look like, to
establish it as at least a serious option.) Time permitting, I'll close
with some remarks on how my arguments bear on a range of views in
metaethics and the philosophy of normativity.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Pekka Väyrynen + photograph and AGM at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-05-16 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The last meeting of the year will be held on Tuesday 21st May. There will
be the traditional annual photograph. The photography for the annual Club
photograph is due to start at 1.50 pm, *so we ask that members who wish to
be in the photograph meet at the gardens of Newnham College by 1.40 pm.*  After
the photograph and before the talk we will hold the Annual General Meeting
at 2.10 pm in the Jane Harrison Room, Newnham. If you have any items for
the agenda, please let the Secretaries know by Monday, 20th.

For our last talk, we are delighted to welcome Pekka Väyrynen (Leeds) who
will be giving a talk entitled “Practical Commitment in Evaluative
Discourse”.  His abstract is as follows:

Evaluative and normative judgments play a distinctive practical role in our
thought. This paper concerns how their practical role is reflected in
language. It is widely assumed that at least those evaluative terms that
can be used to express “thin” evaluative concepts, such as ‘good’ and ‘ought’,
are associated with such practical roles somehow as a matter of meaning.
 But such semantic views are rarely given explicit defense or even
articulation. I first elucidate some different forms such views might take,
and identify a representative version as my target. I then argue that we
have reason to reject this view. Terms like ‘ought’ can be used, even in
normative contexts, to assert thin evaluative claims which don’t play the
term’s customary practical role. This gives us a choice: either offer some
plausible explanation of why the relevant practical features don’t show up in
these cases despite the role they are assigned in our semantic theory, or
else don’t build them into our semantic theory. I argue that plausible
semantic explanations don’t look particularly forthcoming. (In the full
paper I also outline what an alternative pragmatic account of how thin
evaluative terms are associated with their practical roles might look like, to
establish it as at least a serious option.) Time permitting, I'll close
with some remarks on how my arguments bear on a range of views in
metaethics and the philosophy of normativity.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Meghan Sullivan at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-05-13 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will
be held on Tuesday 14th May. We are delighted to welcome Meghan
Sullivan (Notre Dame) who will be giving a talk entitled  'The Love
Imperative - A Defense'. The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in
the Jane Harrison Room at Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and
coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today*.
This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those who sign
up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Moral Sciences Club AGM and Photograph

2019-05-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The Moral Sciences Club Annual General Meeting will be held on Tuesday 21st
May at 2.10 pm in the Jane Harrison Room, Newnham. If you have any items
for the Agenda, please let the Secretaries know by May 15th.

Prior to that there will be the traditional annual photograph. The
photography for the annual Club photograph is due to start at 1.50 pm, so
we ask that members who wish to be in the photograph meet at the gardens of
Newnham College by 1.40 pm.

All the best,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Meghan Sullivan at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-05-08 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 14th
May. We are delighted to welcome Meghan Sullivan (Notre Dame) who will be
giving a talk entitled  'The Love Imperative - A Defense'. Here is an
abstract for the talk:


*We naturally think of love as discriminatory -- you love your partner more
than strangers, your friends more than your adversaries, and your home team
over opponents.  Indeed, most philosophers -- influenced by the Greeks --
have worked hard to carve out a theory of when and why we are permitted to
be so partial in our affections.  Universal love, if we can even understand
it, seems only like an option for saints or hippies... not a realistic or
practical ethical framework for most of us.  In this talk, I'll offer a
philosophical defense of the Love Imperative, which features in various
manifestations in many religiously motivated approaches to morality.  I'll
look specifically at one Christian understanding, defend it from some
difficult objections, and indicate how it might be the basis for a
mainstream philosophical approach to ethics. This talk draws in part from a
book manuscript I am currently working on that develops an intellectualist
conception of love and argues for key applications in moral theory,
epistemology and philosophy of religion.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Jenny Saul at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 7th May

2019-05-06 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that Jenny Saul (University of Sheffield) will be
speaking at MSC tomorrow. Her talk is entitled 'Norms of Racial Discourse
in the Age of Trump' and her abstract is as follows:

Once upon a time, not too long ago, it was accepted wisdom that overt
racism would doom a candidate for national political office in the United
States.  Of course, there was still a good deal of racism among white
Americans—but a politician who openly espoused obviously racist views was
thought to be unelectable.  Elaborate signaling strategies were developed
as ways of playing on these racist sentiments for political gain without
being too obvious about it.  Political psychologists studied these
strategies, though philosophers tended to focus on vastly more obviously
racist speech: slurring or derogatory terms.



Just as philosophers were starting to explore these signaling strategies,
however, something happened.  The world changed dramatically in a way
fundamentally at odds with the previously accepted wisdom: Donald Trump was
elected President, despite very overt expressions of racism.  New, and
deeply pressing questions emerged.  Chief among them, of course are (1) the
descriptive question of how what seemed like fixed norms have come to be,
apparently, smashed; and (2) the normative question of how we should
respond to our new reality.  This paper focuses on (1), exploring in depth
how what political psychologists said could not happen happened.  I will
argue that a norm against racist speech is still (as I write this, anyway)
widely though not universally in force; but that it is not nearly as
effective as we might have thought that it was.



The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club *(
mscsecretar...@gmail.com) *by noon today*. This dinner is open to anyone
who has attended the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified
of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,

Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Jenny Saul at the Moral Sciences Club - ABSTRACT

2019-05-02 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

Following on from yesterday's e-mail we now have the abstract for Jenny
Saul's MSC talk next Tuesday. The updated title of her talk is 'What is
Happening to Our Norms Against Racist Speech*?'. *Her abstract is as
follows:



Once upon a time, not too long ago, it was accepted wisdom that overt
racism would doom a candidate for national political office in the United
States.  Of course, there was still a good deal of racism among white
Americans—but a politician who openly espoused obviously racist views was
thought to be unelectable.  Elaborate signaling strategies were developed
as ways of playing on these racist sentiments for political gain without
being too obvious about it.  Political psychologists studied these
strategies, though philosophers tended to focus on vastly more obviously
racist speech: slurring or derogatory terms.



Just as philosophers were starting to explore these signaling strategies,
however, something happened.  The world changed dramatically in a way
fundamentally at odds with the previously accepted wisdom: Donald Trump was
elected President, despite very overt expressions of racism.  New, and
deeply pressing questions emerged.  Chief among them, of course are (1) the
descriptive question of how what seemed like fixed norms have come to be,
apparently, smashed; and (2) the normative question of how we should
respond to our new reality.  This paper focuses on (1), exploring in depth
how what political psychologists said could not happen happened.  I will
argue that a norm against racist speech is still (as I write this, anyway)
widely though not universally in force; but that it is not nearly as
effective as we might have thought that it was.



Best,

Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Jenny Saul at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 7th May

2019-05-01 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 7th
May. We are delighted to welcome Jenny Saul  (University of Sheffield), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Norms of Racial Discourse in the Age of
Trump'. We will send out an abstract later on in the week.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 6th May. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,

Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Cheshire Calhoun at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 30th April

2019-04-29 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is just to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club
will be held on Tuesday 30th April. We are delighted to welcome Cheshire
Calhoun (Arizona State), who will be giving a talk entitled
'Responsibilities and Taking on Responsibility'.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today*.
This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those who sign
up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Cheshire Calhoun at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 30th April

2019-04-23 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 30th
April. We are delighted to welcome Cheshire Calhoun (Arizona State), who
will be giving a talk entitled 'Responsibilities and Taking on
Responsibility'. Here is the abstract for her talk:

*There is a familiar, everyday notion of a responsibility. Much of daily
life on and off the job is consumed with taking care of responsibilities in
this sense. But what is a responsibility, and how are responsibilities
related to obligations? Reflection on the phenomenon of taking on
responsibilities suggests that the concept of ‘a responsibility’ is
distinct from that of ‘an obligation,’ and that not all responsibilities
are also obligations even though many are.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 29th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Karamvir Chadha at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-03-11 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club (and
the final meeting of term) will be held on Tuesday 12th March. We are
delighted to welcome Karamvir Chadha (Cambridge) who will be giving a talk
entitled 'Conditional Consent'.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 11th (today). This dinner is open to anyone who has
attended the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the
details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Karamvir Chadha at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 12th March

2019-03-07 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 12th
March. We are delighted to welcome Karamvir Chadha (Cambridge) who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Conditional Consent'. Here is the abstract for his
talk:

*The English courts are developing a concept of "conditional consent" to
sexual intercourse. Someone can place a condition on their sexual consent,
and sex in breach of that condition is non-consensual. But there is doubt
about how far the concept should extend. There is little doubt that sex in
breach of a condition to wear a condom can be non-consensual. But should
sex in breach of a condition of payment also be considered non-consensual?
To help provide a principled answer to this question, I distinguish two
ways in which someone can place conditions on their morally valid consent.
I suggest that this distinction helps provide a principled approach for
whether to extend the law of conditional consent to sexual intercourse to
cover conditions like payment, as well as helping us understand how we
place conditions on our morally valid consent in non-sexual contexts.  *

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 11th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Liam Kofi Bright at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-03-04 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will
be held on Tuesday 5th March. We are delighted to welcome Liam Kofi Bright
(LSE), who will be giving a talk entitled 'The Scientist Qua Scientist
Makes No Assertion' (co-authored with Haixin Dang). Here is the abstract
for his talk:

*Assertions are, speaking roughly, descriptive statements which purport to
describe something. Philosophers have given a lot of attention to the idea
that assertions come with special norms governing their behaviour.
Frequently, in fact, philosophers claim that for something to count as an
assertion it has to be governed by these norms. So what exactly are the
norms of assertion? Here there is disagreement. Some philosophers believe
assertions are governed by special factive norms, to the effect that an
assertion must be true, or known to be true, or known with certainty to be
true - or in any case that an assertion is normatively good just in case it
meets some condition that entails its truth. Other philosophers place
weaker epistemic constraints on good assertion. For instance the claim that
an assertion is justified given the assertor's evidence. We argue that no
such norm could apply to a special class of scientific utterances - namely,
the conclusions of scientific papers, or more generally the sort of
utterances scientists use to communicate the results of their inquiry. Such
utterances might look like paradigm instances of descriptive statements
purporting to describe something, yet the norms of assertion philosophers
have surveyed are systematically inapt for science. Hence, either
philosophers are generally wrong about these norms, or strictly speaking
scientists should not be considered to be making assertions at all when
they report their results. After surveying our argument for this negative
claim, we end by suggesting a norm of utterance that would be more
appropriate to scientific practice.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 4th (today). This dinner is open to anyone who has
attended the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the
details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Liam Kofi Bright at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 5th March

2019-03-01 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 5th
March. We are delighted to welcome Liam Kofi Bright (LSE) as our speaker.
He has not yet confirmed the topic of his talk, but you can read more about
his research here: https://www.liamkofibright.com/

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 4th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Øystein Linnebo at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-24 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 26th
February. We are delighted to welcome Øystein Linnebo (Oslo) who will be
giving a talk entitled  'Generality explained'. The meeting will be held
from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at Newnham College, and will
be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today*.
This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those who sign
up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Øystein Linnebo at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 26th
February. We are delighted to welcome Øystein Linnebo (Oslo) who will be
giving a talk entitled  'Generality explained'. Here is an abstract for the
talk:

*What explains a true universal generalization? This paper distinguishes
two kinds of explanation. While an instance-based explanation proceeds via
each instance of the generalization, a generic explanation is independent
of each instance, relying instead on completely general facts about the
properties or operations involved in the generalization. This distinction
is illuminated by means of a truthmaker semantics, which is also used to
show that instance-based explanations support classical logic, while
generic explanations support only intuitionistic logic.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Adrian Haddock at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-18 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 19th
February. We are delighted to welcome Adrian Haddock (Stirling)  who will
be giving a talk entitled  'Self-Consciousness, Sensory Consciousness, and
Indirect Discourse'. The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the
Jane Harrison Room at Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and
coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today*.
This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those who sign
up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Adrian Haddock at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-13 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 19th
February. We are delighted to welcome Adrian Haddock (Stirling)  who will
be giving a talk entitled  'Self-Consciousness, Sensory Consciousness, and
Indirect Discourse'. Here is an abstract for the talk:

*This paper falls into three parts.  The first part considers some
difficulties for the idea of indirect discourse, in order to bring out a
distinction between two kinds of report: those given from within what they
report, which say how things are for the subject; and those given from
outside, which say how things are in themselves.  The second part draws on
this distinction to shed light on the philosophical idea of
self-consciousness—the idea that Aristotle captures by saying that the mind
“thinks itself”—and then draws on this idea to put in place a further
distinction between an understanding that proceeds from within, and an
understanding from outside.  Finally, the third part exploits this last
distinction to explain what is at stake in the apparent disagreement
between those who acknowledge that cases of sensory consciousness are
conceptual acts, and those who profess to see no reason to think this.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Cathy Mason at Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-10 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will
be held tomorrow, Tuesday 12th February. We are delighted to welcome Cathy
Mason (Cambridge) who will be giving a talk entitled 'Humility and Moral
Development'. Here is an abstract for the talk:

*Humility can seem like a somewhat 'unfashionable' virtue: the word can
conjure an image of cringing servility, unduly romanticised feelings of
inferiority, or a level of self-denial which seems ill-placed in a life
well-lived. But the term can also capture something of great ethical
importance. In this paper, I will propose an account of humility that
attempts to capture this moral significance. I will then explore the
connection between humility and ethical development, seeking to argue
that humility has an important role in ethical improvement. If such a
connection is vindicated, it suggests that humility is valuable twice over:
it has intrinsic worth but is also instrumentally valuable, enabling us to
become better people.  *

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today -
Monday 11th*. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those
who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Cathy Mason at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 12th February

2019-02-07 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 12th
February. We are delighted to welcome Cathy Mason (Cambridge) who will be
giving a talk entitled 'Humility and Moral Development'. Here is an
abstract for the talk:

*Humility can seem like a somewhat ‘unfashionable’ virtue: the word can
conjure an image of cringing servility, unduly romanticised feelings of
inferiority, or a level of self-denial which seems ill-placed in a life
well-lived. But the term can also capture something of great ethical
importance. In this paper, I will propose an account of humility that
attempts to capture this moral significance. I will then explore the
connection between humility and ethical development, seeking to argue
that humility has an important role in ethical improvement. If such a
connection is vindicated, it suggests that humility is valuable twice over:
it has intrinsic worth but is also instrumentally valuable, enabling us to
become better people.  *

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 11th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Cecilia Heyes at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-02-04 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that the next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will
be held on Tuesday 5th February. We are delighted to welcome Cecilia Heyes
(Oxford) who will be giving a talk entitled  'Cognitive Gadgets'.

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

Instead of the usual dinner we will go to a pub immediately after the talk,
if you want to join just stick around, there is no need to sign up.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] CORRECTION: Cecilia Heyes at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-01-31 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

apologies for the second email, unfortunately the announcement contained a
small mistake: Instead of the dinner we will just go to a pub immediately
after the talk, if you want to join just stick around, there is no need to
sign up.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc


-- Forwarded message -
From: Moral Sciences Club 
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 09:21
Subject: Cecilia Heyes at the Moral Sciences Club
To: , 


Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 5th
February. We are delighted to welcome Cecilia Heyes (Oxford)  who will be
giving a talk entitled  'Cognitive Gadgets'. Here is an abstract for the
talk:

*Evolutionary psychology casts the human mind as a collection of cognitive
instincts - organs of thought shaped by genetic evolution and constrained
by the needs of our Stone Age ancestors. This picture was plausible 25
years ago but, I argue, it no longer fits the facts.  Research in
psychology and neuroscience - involving nonhuman animals, infants and adult
humans - now suggests that genetic evolution has merely tweaked the human
mind, making us more friendly than our pre-human ancestors, more attentive
to other agents, and giving us souped-up, general-purpose mechanisms of
learning, memory and cognitive control. Using these resources, our
special-purpose organs of thought – including our capacity to ascribe
mental states - are built in the course of development through social
interaction. They are products of cultural rather than genetic evolution,
cognitive gadgets rather than cognitive instincts.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Cecilia Heyes at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-01-31 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 5th
February. We are delighted to welcome Cecilia Heyes (Oxford)  who will be
giving a talk entitled  'Cognitive Gadgets'. Here is an abstract for the
talk:

*Evolutionary psychology casts the human mind as a collection of cognitive
instincts - organs of thought shaped by genetic evolution and constrained
by the needs of our Stone Age ancestors. This picture was plausible 25
years ago but, I argue, it no longer fits the facts.  Research in
psychology and neuroscience - involving nonhuman animals, infants and adult
humans - now suggests that genetic evolution has merely tweaked the human
mind, making us more friendly than our pre-human ancestors, more attentive
to other agents, and giving us souped-up, general-purpose mechanisms of
learning, memory and cognitive control. Using these resources, our
special-purpose organs of thought – including our capacity to ascribe
mental states - are built in the course of development through social
interaction. They are products of cultural rather than genetic evolution,
cognitive gadgets rather than cognitive instincts.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the
talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Anna Marmodoro at the Moral Sciences Club

2019-01-27 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on
Tuesday 29th January. We are delighted to welcome Anna
Marmodoro (Oxford/Durham), who will be giving a talk entitled  'Building
the world without relations. The master builders: Anaxagoras, Plato and
Aristotle'. The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane
Harrison Room at Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by midday today.*
This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and those who sign
up for dinner will be notified of the details closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Anna Marmodoro at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 29th January

2019-01-23 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on
Tuesday 29th January. We are delighted to welcome Anna
Marmodoro (Oxford/Durham), who will be giving a talk entitled  'Building
the world without relations. The master builders: Anaxagoras, Plato and
Aristotle'. Here is an abstract for the talk:

*Can Plato improve on Russell?  I will offer a new understanding of Plato’s
Theory of Forms which I hope will motivate a re-conception of relations in
contemporary philosophy. In Plato’s theory, ‘participation in a Form’ is
the mechanism by which properties are instantiated in things. There is no
other mechanism of instantiation of a property, for any type of property,
than participation in a Form. Since Forms are uniform (monoeides),
participation is in uniformity. It follows that neither the Forms, nor
their instantiation can ground asymmetrical properties in things. How,
then, does Plato account for the metaphysics of relations? Could it lead us
to a novel understanding of relations? I aim to stimulate thoughts in this
direction. *

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 28th. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the details
closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Stacie Friend at Moral Sciences Club

2019-01-21 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held *tomorrow *-
Tuesday 22nd January. We are delighted to welcome Stacie Friend (Birkbeck),
who will be giving a talk entitled 'Fiction and Emotion: The Normative
Question'. Here is an abstract for her talk:

*In his 'How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?' (1975) and a
series of subsequent replies to critics, Colin Radford argued that
emotional responses to fictional characters are incoherent, inconsistent
and irrational. Nearly everyone disagrees with this conclusion, but (I
maintain) for the wrong reasons. Radford's challenge is this: In ordinary
circumstances, it would be irrational for someone to persist in pitying a
person if she knows that the person does not exist or has not suffered; but
this is exactly our situation when we pity Anna Karenina. If we disagree
with Radford, we must explain why emotions in the two scenarios elicit
different normative judgements. In this paper I consider and reject some
obvious explanations, and propose an alternative.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com ) by 2pm today. *This
dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and it will take place
at Thaikhun  - those who sign up for dinner will be notified of the
specific details by email closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Stacie Friend at the Moral Sciences Club - Tuesday 22nd January

2019-01-16 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 22nd
January. We are delighted to welcome Stacie Friend (Birkbeck), who will be
giving a talk entitled  'Fiction and Emotion: The Normative Question'. Here
is an abstract for her talk:

*In his 'How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?' (1975) and a
series of subsequent replies to critics, Colin Radford argued that
emotional responses to fictional characters are incoherent, inconsistent
and irrational. Nearly everyone disagrees with this conclusion, but (I
maintain) for the wrong reasons. Radford's challenge is this: In ordinary
circumstances, it would be irrational for someone to persist in pitying a
person if she knows that the person does not exist or has not suffered; but
this is exactly our situation when we pity Anna Karenina. If we disagree
with Radford, we must explain why emotions in the two scenarios elicit
different normative judgements. In this paper I consider and reject some
obvious explanations, and propose an alternative.*

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at
Newnham College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk, please email the secretaries of the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com)
by midday on Monday 21st. This dinner is open to anyone who has attended
the talk and it will take place at Thaikhun  - those who sign up for dinner
will be notified of the specific details by email closer to the time.

Best wishes,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] REMINDER: Nick Stang at Moral Sciences Club

2018-11-26 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

this is a reminder that next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be
held on Tuesday 27th November. We are delighted to welcome Nick Stang
(Toronto), who will be giving a paper entitled  'On The Very Idea of an
Alien Language: Old Problems for New Carnapians'. The meeting will be held
from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison Room at Newnham College, and will
be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk at the Moral Sciences Club, please email the secretaries of
the club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com **) by midday
on Monday.* This dinner is open to anyone who has attended the talk and it
will take place in the evening at a location to be determined (those who
sign up for dinner will be notified of the details by email closer to the
time).

Best,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Nick Stang at Moral Sciences Club

2018-11-21 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

The next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be held on Tuesday 27th
November. We are delighted to welcome Nick Stang (Toronto), who will be
giving a paper entitled  'On The Very Idea of an Alien Language: Old
Problems for New Carnapians'. The abstract is as follows:

*Carnapian views in meta-ontology have been thriving in recent decades.
While these “neo-Carnapians” differ in many important ways, they all trace
the inspiration for their views back to Carnap 1950. The key idea of Carnap
1950 was the distinction between ontological questions asked within a
“linguistic framework” (i.e. once we have decided to speak the platonist
language) and ontological questions asked outside such a framework (i.e.
when we are deciding whether to speak the platonist language). I will argue
that these neo-Carnapian views inherit from their mentor a deep problem,
the problem of “radically alien” language frameworks (i.e. frameworks with
no ontology in common with ours). I argue that the neo-Carnapians are
committed to the possibility of such frameworks, but cannot account for
them. At best, this generates within neo-Carnapian meta-metaphysics exactly
the kind of unanswerable metaphysical questions it was designed to avoid,
i.e. about the limits of possible languages and the underlying metaphysical
structure of the world.  At worst, it generates a contradiction within
their theory itself. Davidson raised a similar problem for logical
positivism. In fact, the problem is structurally analogous to one that
dominated the early reception of Kant’s philosophy. These old problems, I
will argue, remain dauntingly difficult ones for neo-Carnapians.*


The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison
Room at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

If you would like to have dinner with the speaker in the evening following
the talk at the Moral Sciences Club, please email the secretaries of the club
(mscsecretar...@gmail.com) by midday on Monday*.* This dinner is open to
anyone who has attended the talk and it will take place in the evening at a
location to be determined (those who sign up for dinner will be notified of
the details by email closer to the time).

Best,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Angelika Kratzer slides

2018-11-20 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Hi all,

Please see below the slides for this afternoon's talk.

Best,
Annie

-- Forwarded message -
From: Kratzer, Angelika 
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018, 8:37 am
Subject: Re: Invitation to Speak at University of Cambridge Moral Sciences
Club
To: Moral Sciences Club 


Dear Annie,

I posted the slides for my talk, so people can load them onto their laptops
if they wish.

https://umass.box.com/v/cambridge

Looking forward to meeting you later today,

— Angelika
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


[CamPhilEvents] Reminder: Angelika Kratzer at Moral Sciences Club

2018-11-19 Thread Moral Sciences Club
Dear all,

This is to remind you that next meeting of the Moral Sciences Club will be
held tomorrow, Tuesday 20th November. We are delighted to welcome Professor
Angelika Kratzer (Amherst), who will be giving a paper entitled  'What’s an
Epistemic Modal Anyway'. The abstract is as follows:

*Epistemic modals like English “might” have a special place in contemporary
> philosophy. They seem to give rise to distinctive puzzles and are therefore
> considered to be “semantically distinctive in ways that set them apart from
> other modals in significant respects” (Yalcin 2016). I will argue for a
> unified semantics for epistemic and non-epistemic modals that projects
> modal domains from pieces of reality in a completely uniform way.*
>

The meeting will be held from 2:30 until 4:15 in the Jane Harrison
Room at Newnham
College, and will be followed by tea and coffee.

*If you would like to have dinner with the speake*r in the evening
following the talk at the Moral Sciences Club, *please email the
secretaries of the **club (mscsecretar...@gmail.com
**) by 2pm on Monday.* This dinner is open to
anyone who has attended the talk and it will take place in the evening at a
location to be determined (those who sign up for dinner will be notified of
the details by email closer to the time).

Best,
--
Annie Bosse, Benjamin Marschall and Lucy McDonald
Secretaries of the Moral Sciences Club
Faculty of Philosophy
University of Cambridge
msc...@hermes.cam.ac.uk
http://www.phil.cam.ac.uk/seminars-phil/seminars-msc
_
To unsubscribe from the CamPhilEvents mailing list,
or change your membership options, please visit
the list information page: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEvents

List archive: http://bit.ly/CamPhilEventsArchive

Please note that CamPhilEvents doesn't accept email
attachments. See the list information page for further 
details and suggested alternatives.


  1   2   3   4   5   >