[PHP] URL-funtion - returnvalue into variable...?
Hi there! I'm a total newbie at connecting to diffrent servers, and b2b and such stuff , so I guess this is a simple question for you guys... Another company wants me to access their productinfo thorugh URL, something like this: https://www.anothercompany.com/returnValueOfProductID=1043 If I access this site, the value of product that has ID 1043 will be returned. How do I get this returnvalue into a variable? /G @varupiraten.se -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 2005-01-10 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] libphp4.so not created on upgrade
heath boutwell wrote: --- Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, what is created? Do you get a .libs/libphp4 file with no extension? If so, you can either just rename that to .libs/libphp4.so or run libtoolize --force and re-run ./configure -Rasmus Still no libphp4.so created by make install. Here is results from libtoolize --force Using `AC_PROG_RANLIB' is rendered obsolete by `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' You should add the contents of `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' to `aclocal.m4'. Here are the files created by make install: Installing PHP SAPI module: cgi Installing PHP CGI into: /usr/bin/ Installing shared extensions: /usr/lib/php4/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20020429/ Installing PEAR environment: /usr/lib/php4/php/ [PEAR] Archive_Tar- already installed: 1.2 [PEAR] Console_Getopt - already installed: 1.2 [PEAR] PEAR - already installed: 1.3.2 Wrote PEAR system config file at: /usr/etc/pear.conf You may want to add: /usr/lib/php4/php to your php.ini include_path [PEAR] DB - already installed: 1.6.8 [PEAR] HTTP - already installed: 1.3.3 [PEAR] Mail - already installed: 1.1.4 [PEAR] Net_SMTP - already installed: 1.2.6 [PEAR] Net_Socket - already installed: 1.0.2 [PEAR] XML_Parser - already installed: 1.2.1 [PEAR] XML_RPC- already installed: 1.1.0 Installing build environment: /usr/lib/php/build/ Installing header files: /usr/include/php/ Installing helper programs: /usr/bin/ program: phpize program: php-config program: phpextdist I get no errors in the make/make test/make install stages. Why isn't libphp4.so created? It also seems bizarre that I am the only person that has encountered this. Because you built the CGI version as it says. You need to use the --with-apxs configure switch to build the Apache SAPI. -Rasmus -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] URL-funtion - returnvalue into variable...?
u can try fopen On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:40:26 +0100, Wiberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there! I'm a total newbie at connecting to diffrent servers, and b2b and such stuff , so I guess this is a simple question for you guys... Another company wants me to access their productinfo thorugh URL, something like this: https://www.anothercompany.com/returnValueOfProductID=1043 If I access this site, the value of product that has ID 1043 will be returned. How do I get this returnvalue into a variable? /G @varupiraten.se -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 2005-01-10 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Get name of extending class with static method call
I'm not sure if this will work, but hey, you could give it a try.
class Car
{
public static $className = __CLASS__;
public static function drive ()
{
return self::$className;
}
}
class Porsche extends Car
{
public static $className = __CLASS__;
}
Porche::drive(); // Should return Porche
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the idea but it causes an error:
Fatal error: Cannot redeclare property static public Car::$className in
class Porsche
If I ommit the definition of $className in Car I get this error:
Fatal error: Access to undeclared static property: Car::$className
If I ommit the definition of $className in Porsche the return value is 'Car'
not 'Porsche'. Arrrgh!
Will keep on trying.
Best regards, Torsten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Jason Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only other solution that comes to mind is a little messy but it lets
you get away with no object. Instead of calling the method statically
you can use call_user_func_array() with the child class name as a
parameter. Then change the parent method to accept the child class name
as a parameter.
?php
function call_static_child() {
$drive_args = func_get_args();
/** assume that first parameter is child of class Car */
return call_user_func_array(array($drive_args[0], 'drive'),
$drive_args);
}
?
Hi Jason,
thanks for taking a look but there *must* be a way to achieve this without
passing any parameters around. Otherwise I could just do:
Porsche::drive('Porsche');
Best regards, Torsten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Torsten, I also found the following link to be helpful. Check out the
user notes from michael at digitalgnosis dot removethis dot com (he did
something similar to what I have already suggested, i.e. call_user_func)
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.static.php
Hi Jason,
thanks for the link. It helped me to find out that this does work:
class Car {
function drive() {
echo 'pre';print_r(debug_backtrace());
}
}
class Porsche extends Car {
function drive() {
parent::drive();
}
}
By tunnelling the call through Porsche's own drive() method
debug_backtrace() will contain two traces, one of them with the correct
class name.
I tried using reflection but reflecting car by using __CLASS__ doesn't
give any information about the classes that extend it. So this doesn't work
either.
Rory's proposed way of reading in the file contents and preg_matching the
method name works, but it's very, very ugly, indeed! ;)
Isn't it somewhat ridiculous that there is no *easy* way in PHP5 to achieve
what I consider to be a pretty straightforward requirement?:
Get name of the class that invoked a static call of an inherited method
I would like to thank all of those that cared about my problem and tried to
find a solution by providing a wide variety of ideas. Thank you very much!!!
Do you think it would be wise to ask for help on php-dev?
Best regards, Torsten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Offline working
Because of the problems working with the email version of the php lists, I'm forced to use the newgroup interface. Up until recently I could happily get up in the morning and 'Download Now' in Mozilla so I can scan messages quickly locally. Since xmas the 'Download Now' simply gets the first message and then times out. It's working fine on Eclipse and Borland so it's not my end, but now the only way to get the messages is one at a time. Is this something that has been changed at www.php.net? Can anything be done about it? Why should offline working be such a problem? -- Lester Caine - L.S.Caine Electronic Services -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Hello last days i've seen on php dot net site that the search engine has impleted a new autocomplete option that was disabled soon. anyone know why did they disable it ? is there any disadvantage with that ? i'm interested in the autocomplete option with inputs, i used it with pear : HTML_QuickForm but wasnt enough good like what i saw on php.net and what u can see on http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1 anyone know how to do that ? wich technologie is used over it ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Data Enryption
Hi, I have site that allows users to upload private information to our server. We would like to encrypt the data for security reasons and only allow certain users to be able to un-encrypt the data and view it. I have looked at the PHP encryption functions and they appear to be one way algorithms - I am guessing this is the whole point of encrption ;) Does anyone have any suggestions regarding this? Many thanks -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Zouari Fourat wrote: Hello last days i've seen on php dot net site that the search engine has impleted a new autocomplete option that was disabled soon. anyone know why did they disable it ? is there any disadvantage with that ? AFAIK it was a major resource hit. The complete source of the php.net site is available; and you can view the CVS history via a web iterface: http://cvs.php.net/phpweb/ I would suggest searching that for the code. i'm interested in the autocomplete option with inputs, i used it with pear : HTML_QuickForm but wasnt enough good like what i saw on php.net and what u can see on http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1 anyone know how to do that ? wich technologie is used over it ? javascript. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
Am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2005 11:13 schrieb Shaun:
Hi,
I have site that allows users to upload private information to our server.
We would like to encrypt the data for security reasons and only allow
certain users to be able to un-encrypt the data and view it. I have looked
at the PHP encryption functions and they appear to be one way algorithms -
I am guessing this is the whole point of encrption ;)
Does anyone have any suggestions regarding this?
Many thanks
hey :)
you should use the mcrypt_* functions. Look at the manual pages,
you will find there many examples.
Here are some functions i use for encryption of private data,
may they help you:
/**
* mcrypt iv generieren
*/
if(!isset($_SESSION['MCRYPT_IV'])) {
$_SESSION['MCRYPT_IV']=
mcrypt_create_iv(mcrypt_get_iv_size(MCRYPT_BLOWFISH, MCRYPT_MODE_CBC),
MCRYPT_DEV_URANDOM);
}
/**
* Encryption
*
* @param String input - unencrypted string
* @return String encrypted string
*/
function encrypt($input) {
$encrypted= mcrypt_encrypt(MCRYPT_BLOWFISH, SECRET, $input,
MCRYPT_MODE_CBC, $_SESSION['MCRYPT_IV']);
$encoded= base64_encode($encrypted);
return
$encoded;
}
/**
* Decryption
*
* @param String input - encrypted string
* @return String - decrypted string
*/
function decrypt($input) {
$decoded= base64_decode($input);
$decrypted= mcrypt_decrypt(MCRYPT_BLOWFISH, SECRET, $decoded,
MCRYPT_MODE_CBC, $_SESSION['MCRYPT_IV']);
return
rtrim($decrypted);
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re[2]: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Hello Jochem, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 10:22:26 AM, you wrote: last days i've seen on php dot net site that the search engine has impleted a new autocomplete option that was disabled soon. anyone know why did they disable it ? is there any disadvantage with that ? JM AFAIK it was a major resource hit. Yeah that and it redirected Firefox users to blank pages even if they didn't use it (glad to see it removed for now). Best regards, Richard Davey -- http://www.launchcode.co.uk - PHP Development Services I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
if it was js, where's the code ? i didnt find it in the source of google.com and i havent notated any frame/iframe On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:22:26 +0100, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zouari Fourat wrote: Hello last days i've seen on php dot net site that the search engine has impleted a new autocomplete option that was disabled soon. anyone know why did they disable it ? is there any disadvantage with that ? AFAIK it was a major resource hit. The complete source of the php.net site is available; and you can view the CVS history via a web iterface: http://cvs.php.net/phpweb/ I would suggest searching that for the code. i'm interested in the autocomplete option with inputs, i used it with pear : HTML_QuickForm but wasnt enough good like what i saw on php.net and what u can see on http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1 anyone know how to do that ? wich technologie is used over it ? javascript. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Error loading extension dlls in WindosXP for PHP4.3.10
Well Richard, I could able to solve it by copying all dlls into Windows\System32 directory. But still not sure why I need to copy all dlls into system32 directory though I have mentioned in php.ini file that extension_directory=c:\PHP4\extensions. regards, Ranjan Hi Ranjan, You might find this page useful: http://uk.php.net/install.windows.extensions I found I needed to add the path C:\PHP\dlls to the XP System variable 'Path' as a lot of extensions have dependencies on dlls found in this directory. (in XP: Control Panel / System / Advanced / Environment Variables) Don't forget to seperate what you add in from the existing paths with a ; Best Wishes, James -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] weird upload problem
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to
http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 January 2005 01:59
form action=/ enctype=multipart/form-data method=post
1: input type=file name=image[]br /
2: input type=file name=image[]br /
3: input type=file name=image[]br /
4: input type=file name=image[]br /
5: input type=file name=image[]br /
6: input type=file name=image[]br /
input name=submit type=submit value=submit
/form
if (isset($_FILES['image']))
{
$number = 0;
for ($i = 0; $i count($_FILES['image']); $i++)
foreach ($FILES['image'] as $i=$imagefile)
Solves both problems.
Cheers!
Mike
-
Mike Ford, Electronic Information Services Adviser,
Learning Support Services, Learning Information Services, JG125, James
Graham Building, Leeds Metropolitan University, Headingley Campus, LEEDS,
LS6 3QS, United Kingdom
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +44 113 283 2600 extn 4730 Fax: +44 113 283 3211
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re[2]: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Hello Zouari, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 10:55:45 AM, you wrote: ZF if it was js, where's the code ? i didnt find it in the source of ZF google.com and i havent notated any frame/iframe It's JS (what else could it be?!) - more info here: http://uk2.php.net/search.php For Google it's on their Suggest lab site: http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1hl=en Best regards, Richard Davey -- http://www.launchcode.co.uk - PHP Development Services I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Zouari Fourat wrote:
if it was js, where's the code ? i didnt find it in the source of
google.com and i havent notated any frame/iframe
your not looking very hard:
first off you need to look in the source of the actual page which you
pointed the list to (thanks for that btw, I had not seen this new beta
widget of googles before!).
somewhere in the source is the following:
SCRIPT src=/ac.js/SCRIPT
SCRIPTInstallAC(document.f,document.f.q,document.f.btnG,search,en);/SCRIPT
I haven't checked it - but I'm willing to bet that ac.js contains the
relevant magic
AFAIKS they have 2 other scripts on that page, but they don't seem to be
directly involved:
script
!--
function sf(){document.f.q.focus();}
// --
/script
and
script!--
function qs(el) {if (window.RegExp window.encodeURIComponent) {var
qe=encodeURIComponent(document.f.q.value);if (el.href.indexOf(q=)!=-1)
{el.href=el.href.replace(new RegExp(q=[^$]*),q=+qe);} else
{el.href+=q=+qe;}}return 1;}
// --
/script
have fun working out exactly what they do :-)
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:22:26 +0100, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zouari Fourat wrote:
Hello
last days i've seen on php dot net site that the search engine has
impleted a new autocomplete option that was disabled soon.
anyone know why did they disable it ? is there any disadvantage with that ?
AFAIK it was a major resource hit.
The complete source of the php.net site is available; and you can view
the CVS history via a web iterface:
http://cvs.php.net/phpweb/
I would suggest searching that for the code.
i'm interested in the autocomplete option with inputs, i used it with
pear : HTML_QuickForm but wasnt enough good like what i saw on php.net
and what u can see on http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1
anyone know how to do that ? wich technologie is used over it ?
javascript.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Richard Davey wrote: ... It's JS (what else could it be?!) - more info here: what else? spontaneous self-realising tele-kinetic voodoo. :-D -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] array walk and class member functions
Hi
I'm batting my head against a wall on this one...
I have a class that has a constructor which sets some initial
conditions, and then a public function that does some work. I want to be
able to call this function from an external array_walk call, but when I
try and reference it as $myClass-myFunction in the array_walk call, I
get an error back saying that this is an invalid function.
eg)
?php
include ../includes/aClass.class;
$myArray = array(item1=firstItem, item2=secondItem);
$myClass = new aClass;
array_walk($myArray,'$myClass-aMemberFunction');
?
As a workaround, I redifined the class so that there was a public
function which made the array_walk call with the worker function defined
internally as follows, but this throws another issue in that if I create
multiple instances of the class then I get an error to say that the
internal function is already defined ...
*Fatal error*: Cannot redeclare aFunction() (previously declared in
/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php:23) in
*/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php* on line *23*
class aClass
{
some other stuff, constructor etc
public function aPublicFunction($anArray)
{
global $aRetrunString;
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
array_walk($anArray,'aFunction');
return $aReturnString;
}
}
Can anyone help me to get either solution to a working state?
By the way...
apache 2.0.49
php-5.0.2
Thanks very much
Tom
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Apache 2.0 and Sessions
Warning: session_start(): open(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\\sess_8c53cb2382f75076c51ed4b3edece36b, O_RDWR) Search the archives... seriously... guaranteed you will find the answer to this. -- Teach a person to fish... Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Generic question : migrating from java based RPC server to PHP
This might be a very generic question. I am in a process of migrating my java based RPC server to PHP. Luckily with the help of the list I could able to make sure that all rpc and xml related function are getting excuted in Apache server. I am using Apache2 in WInXP. But still not sure from where I should start my changes. Any link or tutorial or case study regarding PHP's SOAP and RPC service would help a lot. regards, Ranjan __ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
Tom wrote:
Hi
I'm batting my head against a wall on this one...
I have a class that has a constructor which sets some initial
conditions, and then a public function that does some work. I want to be
able to call this function from an external array_walk call, but when I
try and reference it as $myClass-myFunction in the array_walk call, I
get an error back saying that this is an invalid function.
eg)
?php
include ../includes/aClass.class;
$myArray = array(item1=firstItem, item2=secondItem);
$myClass = new aClass;
array_walk($myArray,'$myClass-aMemberFunction');
try changing this line to:
array_walk($myArray, array($myClass,'aMemberFunction'));
or if you prefer to take the route of your second attempt read on...
?
As a workaround, I redifined the class so that there was a public
function which made the array_walk call with the worker function defined
internally as follows, but this throws another issue in that if I create
multiple instances of the class then I get an error to say that the
internal function is already defined ...
which is correct, you are trying to create this function multiple times.
*Fatal error*: Cannot redeclare aFunction() (previously declared in
/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php:23) in
*/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php* on line *23*
class aClass
{
some other stuff, constructor etc
public function aPublicFunction($anArray)
{
global $aRetrunString;
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value; }
array_walk($anArray,'aFunction');
return $aReturnString;
}
wrap the function def. like so:
if (!function_exists('aFunction')) {
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
}
OR define the function outside of the class e.g.
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
BTW: using a global in the way you do in this function is a bad idea.
array_walk() is defined as follows:
bool array_walk ( array array, callback funcname [, mixed userdata])
check out the manual for info on the last arg:
http://nl2.php.net/array_walk
}
Can anyone help me to get either solution to a working state?
By the way...
apache 2.0.49
php-5.0.2
Thanks very much
Tom
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
By tunnelling the call through Porsche's own drive() method debug_backtrace() will contain two traces, one of them with the correct class name. I tried using reflection but reflecting car by using __CLASS__ doesn't give any information about the classes that extend it. So this doesn't work either. Right... the root issue here seems to be that everything is relying on the __CLASS__ macro, but this macro behaves differently than what you expected (a la debug_backtrace in PHP4) Rory's proposed way of reading in the file contents and preg_matching the method name works, but it's very, very ugly, indeed! ;) Isn't it somewhat ridiculous that there is no *easy* way in PHP5 to achieve what I consider to be a pretty straightforward requirement?: Get name of the class that invoked a static call of an inherited method Indeed! I was actually quite surprised that this wasn't the way __CLASS__ resolved... I had to code it to believe it (and I didn't even do that until after you told us __CLASS__ didn't work!) I would like to thank all of those that cared about my problem and tried to find a solution by providing a wide variety of ideas. Thank you very much!!! Do you think it would be wise to ask for help on php-dev? Perhaps the way to go about this would be to make a feature request on bugs.php.net? It does seem like something that should be a part of the language. -- Teach a person to fish... Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] BEGINNERS READ THIS MAIL!!! was: Re: [PHP] Re: Apache 2.0 and Sessions
Dear Beginners, Jason Barnett has a couple links in his sig that every beginner should read for their benefit as well as ours(mine ;-): Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2 (nice one Jason!) Jason Barnett wrote: Warning: session_start(): open(C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\\sess_8c53cb2382f75076c51ed4b3edece36b, O_RDWR) Search the archives... seriously... guaranteed you will find the answer to this. always a good idea to search the archives, not always easy but if you do and mention that when you end up posting a question (because you can't find an answer or still don't get it) you will probably get a tad more respect and that increases the chances of a useful reply! happy coding! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Generic question : migrating from java based RPC server to PHP
Ranjan K. Baisak wrote: This might be a very generic question. generic questions suck - noone here is psychic! :-) (in reference to a Comment made by Martin Norland on php-db@lists.php.net - which still cracks me up everytime I think about it: http://www.phpbuilder.com/lists/php-db/2004122/0073.php) I am in a process of migrating my java based RPC server to PHP. Luckily with the help of the list I could able to make sure that all rpc and xml related function are getting excuted in Apache server. I am using Apache2 in WInXP. But still not sure from where I should start my changes. Any link or tutorial or case study regarding PHP's SOAP and RPC service would help a lot. 8 pages on PHP+SOAP: http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Zend/PHP-SOAP-Extension/ which I found by typing 3 words into google: PHP RPC SOAP I'll even save you the typing: http://www.google.nl/search?q=PHP+RPC+SOAP regards, Ranjan __ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: array walk and class member functions
Tom wrote:
Hi
I'm batting my head against a wall on this one...
I have a class that has a constructor which sets some initial
conditions, and then a public function that does some work. I want to be
able to call this function from an external array_walk call, but when I
try and reference it as $myClass-myFunction in the array_walk call, I
get an error back saying that this is an invalid function.
Allow Monty Python to help you.
?php
class aClass {
function aMemberFunction($value, $key, $stuff) {
print_r($key: $value. $stuff!\n);
}
}
$myArray = array(item1=firstItem, item2=secondItem);
$myClass = new aClass;
$stuff = Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelled of
Elderberries!;
array_walk($myArray, array($myClass, 'aMemberFunction'), $stuff);
?
--
Teach a person to fish...
Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Generic question : migrating from java based RPC server to PHP
Ranjan K. Baisak wrote: This might be a very generic question. I am in a process of migrating my java based RPC server to PHP. Luckily with the help of the list I could able to make sure that all rpc and xml related function are getting excuted in Apache server. I am using Apache2 in WInXP. But still not sure from where I should start my changes. Any link or tutorial or case study regarding PHP's SOAP and RPC service would help a lot. This might be better asked on the php-soap list? In any case zend.com website is probably a good place to start searching. -- Teach a person to fish... Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
Jochem Maas wrote:
Tom wrote:
snip
Sorry Tom, I hit the send button too early!
I mean to add some context to the code below so you would (hopefully)
understand what I mean:
OR define the function outside of the class e.g.
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
...was meant to be:
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
class aClass
{
some other stuff, constructor etc
public function aPublicFunction($anArray)
{
global $aRetrunString;
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value; }
array_walk($anArray,'aFunction');
return $aReturnString;
}
// rest of the class definition goes here...
snip
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] php style guides
Hi everyone,
What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do
you follow a guide that is available online?
I generally have my own preference for formatting like
if ( condition )
{
statements;
}
for all conditional statements and loops, as opposed to
if (condition) {
statements;
}
But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard
to combining PHP with HTML.
I used to do:
?php
echo blah;
?h1test/h1?php
echo blah;
?
but just tried
?php
echo 'blah';
echo 'h1test/h1';
echo 'blah';
?
which I find it's much easier to read to code.
What do other people do and for what reason? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to doing it certain ways?
Thanks for your time.
Tim
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Jason Barnett wrote: Indeed! I was actually quite surprised that this wasn't the way __CLASS__ resolved... I had to code it to believe it (and I didn't even do that until after you told us __CLASS__ didn't work!) I would like to thank all of those that cared about my problem and tried to find a solution by providing a wide variety of ideas. Thank you very much!!! Do you think it would be wise to ask for help on php-dev? I'll put money on that they say won't do it and then tell you to read the archives of php-internals as to why. I originally hit this problem when I started to write a PHP5 based framework at the end of 2003. during the time since then I have watched/read quite a few threads on this subject. I strongly suggest you brew a big pot of coffee and sit down for a few (lots??) hours to read thru what has been discussed on php-internals, you might start with: Perhaps the way to go about this would be to make a feature request on bugs.php.net? It does seem like something that should be a part of the language. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
darn, send button again!! (sent too early) Jochem Maas wrote: Jason Barnett wrote: Indeed! I was actually quite surprised that this wasn't the way __CLASS__ resolved... I had to code it to believe it (and I didn't even do that until after you told us __CLASS__ didn't work!) I would like to thank all of those that cared about my problem and tried to find a solution by providing a wide variety of ideas. Thank you very much!!! Do you think it would be wise to ask for help on php-dev? I'll put money on that they say won't do it and then tell you to read the archives of php-internals as to why. I originally hit this problem when I started to write a PHP5 based framework at the end of 2003. during the time since then I have watched/read quite a few threads on this subject. my solution used call_user_func_array(), its relatively slow and a ing nightmare in terms of complexity. I strongly suggest you brew a big pot of coffee and sit down for a few (lots??) hours to read thru what has been discussed on php-internals, you might start with: http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00242.html basically, AFAIKR, the final answer was something along the lines of - 'your misusing the static class concept' (don't hold me to that tho!) Perhaps the way to go about this would be to make a feature request on bugs.php.net? It does seem like something that should be a part of the language. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
Tom wrote:
Thanks very much for the help - both methods work fine. I'd had a look
at the array_walk manual, but didn't realise that the second param would
accept an array - that's really cool
indeed that page does not make it very clear,
it's the generic call_back syntax, which can be used practically
everywhere a callback function is expected, the array you pass can be in
the form of:
array($object, 'methodname')
or
array('classname', 'methodname')
the second version allows you to use static class methods.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
hi guys,
[[
I original posted this to php-internals because I figured that
php-general would not know the answer _ it had to do with intended use
of functionality (I couldn't find anything on the web about) and I
figured that the guys who wrote/write php would be best equipped to
answer. well no joy - the post was gloriously ignored, so I figured I
give it a shot here...
]]
I always use curly braces around vars placed in double quoted strings, I
do this for 2 reasons:
1. I believe It helps the engine because the var delimitation is
explicit, and this means the interpolation is (should be?) faster.
2. it looks nice (easier to read!)
I have tried to test this with a simple script that does a million
interations - but I cannot get it to return consistent results - one
time with curlies is faster, another its slower. the (php5) script I
used to test is included at the bottom of the email for those who are
curious. (I haven't been able to find relevant info on either google or
php.net - are there any other search engines? ;-)
I am interested in knowing whether my first assumption regarding speed
of interpolation is (in theory) at all correct.
If any of the php gurus would give advice as to use of curly braces in
interpolated strings would it be:
a, always use them (its faster/better)
b, only when absolutely necessary
c, go away troll and figure it out for yourself
(this one is tempting, n'est pas ;-)
d, something I haven't had the presence of mind to think of!
[[
choice c, is only relevant to internal btw :-)
]]
kind regards,
Jochem.
?
class Tester
{
public $testvar;
}
$t = new Tester;
$t-testvar = 'superduper';
$a = array('junk' = 'notbad!');
var_dump($t, $a);
$strs = array();
$start = mktime();
$i = 0;
do {
$c = 'simplicity' + $i;
$strs[] = {$t-testvar} yadda yadda {$a['junk']} - {$c}\n;
$i++;
} while ($i 101);
$diff = (mktime() - $start);
echo With Curlies - Total Time Taken ($diff): .floor($diff / 60).'
mins '.($diff % 60).' secs'.\n;
$strs = array();
$start = mktime();
$i = 0;
do {
$c = 'simplicity' + $i;
$strs[] = $t-testvar yadda yadda $a[junk] - $c\n;
$i++;
} while ($i 101);
$diff = (mktime() - $start);
echo Without Curlies - Total Time Taken ($diff): .floor($diff / 60).'
mins '.($diff % 60).' secs'.\n;
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: php style guides
* Tim Burgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do
you follow a guide that is available online?
PEAR standards are fairly well-accepted:
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
I generally have my own preference for formatting like
if ( condition )
{
statements;
}
for all conditional statements and loops, as opposed to
if (condition) {
statements;
}
PEAR actually recommends this latter instead of the former; the only
case they make for opening braces on the following line is with class
and function/method definitions. (I personally don't understand why
these are treated differently, but I'm sure there's some discussion in
the mailing lists that treats it.)
But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard
to combining PHP with HTML.
I used to do:
?php
echo blah;
?h1test/h1?php
echo blah;
?
but just tried
?php
echo 'blah';
echo 'h1test/h1';
echo 'blah';
?
which I find it's much easier to read to code.
What do other people do and for what reason? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to doing it certain ways?
I personally try not to put HTML into my code, and use templates:
* Placing HTML into PHP means I'm having to try and decipher two
languages (or more, if I use CSS or Javascript) in the same file;
making the mental switch in the same file is typically more difficult
than having HTML/CSS/JS in different files.
* If I need to worry about HTTP headers deep into the program logic (for
instance, to perform a redirect or set a cookie), I don't want to
worry about whether or not any HTML has been sent to the screen.
* If I need to fix a typo in the HTML, I don't want to browse through a
bunch of PHP to find it.
When I *do* place HTML in my PHP (it *does* happen occasionally), I
typically use heredocs so I don't have to worry about quotes and such:
$html =EOH
h1Test/h1
pThis is a test of the emergency HTML situation/p
pIt received $error_signal/p
EOH;
However, all the above is my personal coding preference; I've heard very
good arguments for other styles and for not using templates.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webmaster and IT Specialist | http://www.garden.org
National Gardening Association| http://www.kidsgardening.com
802-863-5251 x156 | http://nationalgardenmonth.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php style guides
try http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:34:59 +1030, Tim Burgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do
you follow a guide that is available online?
I generally have my own preference for formatting like
if ( condition )
{
statements;
}
for all conditional statements and loops, as opposed to
if (condition) {
statements;
}
But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard
to combining PHP with HTML.
I used to do:
?php
echo blah;
?h1test/h1?php
echo blah;
?
but just tried
?php
echo 'blah';
echo 'h1test/h1';
echo 'blah';
?
which I find it's much easier to read to code.
What do other people do and for what reason? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to doing it certain ways?
Thanks for your time.
Tim
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Offline working
* Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because of the problems working with the email version of the php lists, I'm forced to use the newgroup interface. Up until recently I could happily get up in the morning and 'Download Now' in Mozilla so I can scan messages quickly locally. Since xmas the 'Download Now' simply gets the first message and then times out. It's working fine on Eclipse and Borland so it's not my end, but now the only way to get the messages is one at a time. Is this something that has been changed at www.php.net? Can anything be done about it? Why should offline working be such a problem? I reported a bug during the week after christmas -- the news server was down at the beginning of that week. Since then, it seems like the newsserver they're using isn't tuned to the load it receives -- I often find I lose my connection to it, or that when I initially try to connect, I can't. Just keep hitting the download button every so often, and you should get a full list at some point. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Webmaster and IT Specialist | http://www.garden.org National Gardening Association| http://www.kidsgardening.com 802-863-5251 x156 | http://nationalgardenmonth.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Generic question : migrating from java based RPC server to PHP
--- Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: generic questions suck - noone here is psychic! :-) Ohh what a answer!!! I don't think anybody is psychic. 8 pages on PHP+SOAP: http://www.devshed.com/c/a/Zend/PHP-SOAP-Extension/ Thanks a lot for your updation. regards, Ranjan __ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
indeed that page does not make it very clear,
it's the generic call_back syntax, which can be used practically
everywhere a callback function is expected, the array you pass can be in
the form of:
array($object, 'methodname')
or
array('classname', 'methodname')
the second version allows you to use static class methods.
I never knew about this syntax until I saw it on this newsgroup quite a
few months back. Perhaps an update to the manual is in order?
(Whistling and walking away...)
--
Teach a person to fish...
Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] SQL Server log file
Hello am new to ms sql server and using it for a while, i where searching where to find sql queries log file ? some one have an idea about it ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: php style guides
Tim Burgan wrote:
Hi everyone,
What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do
you follow a guide that is available online?
sacred_cow_warningPlease do not flame me here, different strokes for
different folks!/sacred_cow_warning
If you're entirely new to coding in PHP ... and you don't have a
codebase already existing... then you might consider using the coding
standards as outlined by PEAR (apparently several other people agree):
http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.php
I generally have my own preference for formatting like
if ( condition )
{
statements;
}
And that's fine. The main thing is: aim for consistency of your coding
standards. That way when you look through an entire project it's easy
to see what's going on.
for all conditional statements and loops, as opposed to
if (condition) {
statements;
}
But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard
to combining PHP with HTML.
I used to do:
?php
echo blah;
?h1test/h1?php
echo blah;
?
Personally I don't mix and match HTML with my PHP code. I am extremely
lazy and enjoy finding PHP code available that will do all of the
echo'ing for HTML I want to build. The PEAR package HTML_Quickform is a
good example here; it solves a common problem (building an MVC form) for
me in a way that is faster than coding it all out by hand. That is,
once you know how to use the package. (There are loads of other
packages out there as well; this is but one example.)
But if you look at your HTML as a template (which it pretty much is) for
your front end and you view PHP as your logic back-end (which it is)
then mixing them together is fine. Separating presentation and logic is
generally a good idea; this way you can easily change the way it looks
without breaking functionality (or vice versa). Although if/when I do
it this way I try to make it pretty obvious what I'm trying to accomplish.
html
head?php include 'functions.php'; ?/head
body
h1?php getHeader1(); ?/h1
h2Hello ?php getUserName(); ?! How are you doing this fine day?/h2
/body
/html
but just tried
?php
echo 'blah';
echo 'h1test/h1';
echo 'blah';
?
which I find it's much easier to read to code.
That's always an important consideration. :)
What do other people do and for what reason? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to doing it certain ways?
Thanks for your time.
Tim
--
Teach a person to fish...
Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] [Fwd: [PHP-INSTALL] Install of PHP 5.0.3 Error]
High Guys, I have installed PHP 5.0.3 on an Intel box running Apache 1.3 with a Solaris 9 x86 OS. When I try to restart the Apache server I get this error: Syntax error on line 249 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: /usr/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol xmlRelaxNGCleanupTypes: referenced symbol not found I looked up on the PHP bugs website and it says the error is not a bug it is bogus. It says the problem is UNIX maintenance. It seems if you have two 'libxml2' versions on the system you will get this error. It says to delete the older version and Apache will start. I found a version at '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml' and '/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml'. I deleted the entire directory '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml'. I still get the same error. I decided OK maybe I should recompile PHP now that the other version is gone. I can do a './configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache/bin/apxs'. After I do the configure and enter 'make' it says make: not found. So not only can I not get past the error now I cannot even re-compile. What am I doing wrong. Is there a registry like componant to Solaris I need to change to show the old version is gone? Any help out there for me? Kelly -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php style guides
Tim Burgan wrote:
Hi everyone,
What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do
you follow a guide that is available online?
I generally have my own preference for formatting like
if ( condition )
{
statements;
}
which personally I think is ugly and a waste of space ;-)
(actually I used to do it like that but the better I got at programming
the more I found myself trying to condense my code - mostly so that I
could fit more of it on screen.)
currently I reserve the above CS for functions and classes.
e.g.
myCoolFunc( $arg1, $arg2 = 'default' )
{
// do something cool!
}
for all conditional statements and loops, as opposed to
if (condition) {
statements;
}
this is my (exact) preference for block statements.
its all very personal this!
But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard
to combining PHP with HTML.
I used to do:
?php
echo blah;
?h1test/h1?php
echo blah;
?
which very quickly gets completely unreadable when the complexity starts
piling up.
but just tried
?php
echo 'blah';
echo 'h1test/h1';
echo 'blah';
?
much easier to read, but what about:
?php
echo 'blahh1test/h1blah';
?
or (where the literal strings would normally be vars):
?php
echo 'blah','h1test/h1','blah';
?
or (the semi-colon can be dropped here):
?= 'blahh1test/h1blah'; ?
the consensus is (AFAIKT) that the less you break in and out of PHP
the more legible your code is likely to be. In the same vein it is often
suggested to first process/gather you data and then output everything
after your script is done doing its thing, rather than echoing as you go.
there is also the HEREDOC style of echoing output (actually its a method
of string delimitation) e.g.:
?
echo THE_END
yadda yadda yadda $myArr['key1'][$key2]
$jumpup, $howhigh
THE_END;
?
read more here (or google PHP+HEREDOC):
http://nl2.php.net/types.string
which I find it's much easier to read to code.
What do other people do and for what reason? What are the
advantages/disadvantages to doing it certain ways?
I always advise that readability/maintainability is king - speed is
hardly ever an issue on an average php site, and when speed becomes
critical optimizing echo statements is probably not where you want to
start (creating objects and calling functions is way,way heavier).
so in short: do what you find to be the easiest to read back in 6 months
time!
Thanks for your time.
Tim
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: use of curly braces with string interpolation.
Jochem Maas wrote:
hi guys,
[[
I original posted this to php-internals because I figured that
php-general would not know the answer _ it had to do with intended use
of functionality (I couldn't find anything on the web about) and I
figured that the guys who wrote/write php would be best equipped to
answer. well no joy - the post was gloriously ignored, so I figured I
give it a shot here...
]]
I always use curly braces around vars placed in double quoted strings, I
do this for 2 reasons:
1. I believe It helps the engine because the var delimitation is
explicit, and this means the interpolation is (should be?) faster.
it's just as fast as not using it. The delimiter with variables is
simply the $[a-zA-Z_\x7f-\xff][a-zA-Z0-9_\x7f-\xff]* part. Simple
variables (scalar) are described using the above, it doesn't make it
faster to put more around em. Adding {} around array's/objects shouldn't
make it faster, since it's still just taking the entire thing as a
variable until it comes acress a character that either delimits the
whole thing, or is simply not allowed there.
2. it looks nice (easier to read!)
I think it looks ugly... but it's a simple matter of personal taste ;)
I have tried to test this with a simple script that does a million
interations - but I cannot get it to return consistent results - one
time with curlies is faster, another its slower. the (php5) script I
used to test is included at the bottom of the email for those who are
curious. (I haven't been able to find relevant info on either google or
php.net - are there any other search engines? ;-)
I am interested in knowing whether my first assumption regarding speed
of interpolation is (in theory) at all correct.
If any of the php gurus would give advice as to use of curly braces in
interpolated strings would it be:
a, always use them (its faster/better)
b, only when absolutely necessary
c, go away troll and figure it out for yourself
(this one is tempting, n'est pas ;-)
d, something I haven't had the presence of mind to think of!
[[
choice c, is only relevant to internal btw :-)
]]
kind regards,
Jochem.
?
class Tester
{
public $testvar;
}
$t = new Tester;
$t-testvar = 'superduper';
$a = array('junk' = 'notbad!');
var_dump($t, $a);
$strs = array();
$start = mktime();
$i = 0;
do {
$c = 'simplicity' + $i;
$strs[] = {$t-testvar} yadda yadda {$a['junk']} - {$c}\n;
$i++;
} while ($i 101);
$diff = (mktime() - $start);
echo With Curlies - Total Time Taken ($diff): .floor($diff / 60).'
mins '.($diff % 60).' secs'.\n;
$strs = array();
$start = mktime();
$i = 0;
do {
$c = 'simplicity' + $i;
$strs[] = $t-testvar yadda yadda $a[junk] - $c\n;
$i++;
} while ($i 101);
$diff = (mktime() - $start);
echo Without Curlies - Total Time Taken ($diff): .floor($diff / 60).'
mins '.($diff % 60).' secs'.\n;
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
Thanks very much for the help - both methods work fine. I'd had a look
at the array_walk manual, but didn't realise that the second param would
accept an array - that's really cool!
I don't like the function_exists method much, as I frequently overload
class members. Not needed now as I have the worker defined as a private
function and can access it from the public one as
array_walk($anArray,array($this,'aFunction');
Thanks
Tom
Jochem Maas wrote:
Tom wrote:
Hi
I'm batting my head against a wall on this one...
I have a class that has a constructor which sets some initial
conditions, and then a public function that does some work. I want to
be able to call this function from an external array_walk call, but
when I try and reference it as $myClass-myFunction in the array_walk
call, I get an error back saying that this is an invalid function.
eg)
?php
include ../includes/aClass.class;
$myArray = array(item1=firstItem, item2=secondItem);
$myClass = new aClass;
array_walk($myArray,'$myClass-aMemberFunction');
try changing this line to:
array_walk($myArray, array($myClass,'aMemberFunction'));
or if you prefer to take the route of your second attempt read on...
?
As a workaround, I redifined the class so that there was a public
function which made the array_walk call with the worker function
defined internally as follows, but this throws another issue in that
if I create multiple instances of the class then I get an error to
say that the internal function is already defined ...
which is correct, you are trying to create this function multiple times.
*Fatal error*: Cannot redeclare aFunction() (previously declared in
/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php:23) in
*/usr/local/apache2/htdocs/includes/functions.php* on line *23*
class aClass
{
some other stuff, constructor etc
public function aPublicFunction($anArray)
{
global $aRetrunString;
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value; }
array_walk($anArray,'aFunction');
return $aReturnString;
}
wrap the function def. like so:
if (!function_exists('aFunction')) {
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
}
OR define the function outside of the class e.g.
function aFunction($value, $key)
{
global $aReturnString;
$aReturnString = $aReturnString.$value;
}
BTW: using a global in the way you do in this function is a bad idea.
array_walk() is defined as follows:
bool array_walk ( array array, callback funcname [, mixed userdata])
check out the manual for info on the last arg:
http://nl2.php.net/array_walk
}
Can anyone help me to get either solution to a working state?
By the way...
apache 2.0.49
php-5.0.2
Thanks very much
Tom
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: Offline working
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because of the problems working with the email version of the php lists, I'm forced to use the newgroup interface. Up until recently I could happily get up in the morning and 'Download Now' in Mozilla so I can scan messages quickly locally. Since xmas the 'Download Now' simply gets the first message and then times out. It's working fine on Eclipse and Borland so it's not my end, but now the only way to get the messages is one at a time. Is this something that has been changed at www.php.net? Can anything be done about it? Why should offline working be such a problem? I reported a bug during the week after christmas -- the news server was down at the beginning of that week. Since then, it seems like the newsserver they're using isn't tuned to the load it receives -- I often find I lose my connection to it, or that when I initially try to connect, I can't. Just keep hitting the download button every so often, and you should get a full list at some point. Sounds about right, but its quicker hitting every message rather than waiting for the timeout on 'Download Now' ;) THAT actually seems to be better than it was, before xmas I'd have the problems you describe every three or four messages - but the download all worked - eventually. -- Lester Caine - L.S.Caine Electronic Services -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
[snip] a, always use them (its faster/better) b, only when absolutely necessary c, go away troll and figure it out for yourself (this one is tempting, n'est pas ;-) d, something I haven't had the presence of mind to think of! [/snip] e. All of the above -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Hi, I just tried the example code at http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3 The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have vanished into thin air. I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name of the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do not want to overload the sperclass' method. I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it, PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request? There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5... Cheers, -Morten Jochem Maas wrote: darn, send button again!! (sent too early) Jochem Maas wrote: Jason Barnett wrote: Indeed! I was actually quite surprised that this wasn't the way __CLASS__ resolved... I had to code it to believe it (and I didn't even do that until after you told us __CLASS__ didn't work!) I would like to thank all of those that cared about my problem and tried to find a solution by providing a wide variety of ideas. Thank you very much!!! Do you think it would be wise to ask for help on php-dev? I'll put money on that they say won't do it and then tell you to read the archives of php-internals as to why. I originally hit this problem when I started to write a PHP5 based framework at the end of 2003. during the time since then I have watched/read quite a few threads on this subject. my solution used call_user_func_array(), its relatively slow and a ing nightmare in terms of complexity. I strongly suggest you brew a big pot of coffee and sit down for a few (lots??) hours to read thru what has been discussed on php-internals, you might start with: http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00242.html basically, AFAIKR, the final answer was something along the lines of - 'your misusing the static class concept' (don't hold me to that tho!) Perhaps the way to go about this would be to make a feature request on bugs.php.net? It does seem like something that should be a part of the language. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
Jay Blanchard wrote: [snip] a, always use them (its faster/better) b, only when absolutely necessary c, go away troll and figure it out for yourself (this one is tempting, n'est pas ;-) d, something I haven't had the presence of mind to think of! [/snip] e. All of the above WTF? :-) - I assume you are making a joke here. a, b, are mutually exclusive c, was reserved for people with considerably more _demonstrable_ experience/knowledge of PHP than myself (which discludes about 90% of all people who actually mail to this list ;-) and if d, then some kind of explaination could be assumed to be pertinent. cheers, Jochem -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] array walk and class member functions
Jason Barnett wrote:
indeed that page does not make it very clear,
it's the generic call_back syntax, which can be used practically
everywhere a callback function is expected, the array you pass can be
in the form of:
array($object, 'methodname')
or
array('classname', 'methodname')
the second version allows you to use static class methods.
I never knew about this syntax until I saw it on this newsgroup quite a
few months back. Perhaps an update to the manual is in order?
(Whistling and walking away...)
perhaps not:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.pseudo-types.php#language.types.callback
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] SQL Server log file
Zouari Fourat wrote: Hello am new to ms sql server and using it for a while, i where searching where to find sql queries log file ? some one have an idea about it ? There's a php question in there somewhere, right? -- John C. Nichel ÜberGeek KegWorks.com 716.856.9675 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:13:08 -, Shaun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have site that allows users to upload private information to our server.
We would like to encrypt the data for security reasons and only allow
certain users to be able to un-encrypt the data and view it. I have looked
at the PHP encryption functions and they appear to be one way algorithms - I
am guessing this is the whole point of encrption ;)
Does anyone have any suggestions regarding this?
function encrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) + ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
function decrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) - ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
--
Greg Donald
Zend Certified Engineer
http://destiney.com/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] SQL Server log file
[snip] am new to ms sql server and using it for a while, i where searching where to find sql queries log file ? some one have an idea about it ? [/snip] A MS SQL list might. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Morten Rønseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I just tried the example code at http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3 The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have vanished into thin air. I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name of the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do not want to overload the sperclass' method. I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it, PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request? There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5... Cheers, -Morten Hi guys, I guess it's time to risk asking on php-dev ;) I will try my luck. Let's see what the gurus say! Regards, Torsten -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
function encrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
No offense intended to you sir... but why do you use a static key in
this way instead of using mcrypt? Please forgive my naivete regarding
encryption.
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) + ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
function decrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
Similar question here. I know you would need the key for decryption,
but again why not use mcrypt? Has it not been hammered out enough to
your liking?
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) - ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
--
Teach a person to fish...
Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 05:38, Jochem Maas wrote: Richard Davey wrote: ... It's JS (what else could it be?!) - more info here: what else? spontaneous self-realising tele-kinetic voodoo. :-D We used to call that MTAM (Mental Telepathy Access Method) Bret -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Torsten Roehr wrote: Morten Rønseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I just tried the example code at http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3 The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have vanished into thin air. I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name of the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do not want to overload the sperclass' method. I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it, PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request? There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5... Cheers, -Morten Hi guys, I guess it's time to risk asking on php-dev ;) I will try my luck. Let's see what the gurus say! Regards, Torsten why do you think they'd respond with something else than ask at php.generals ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Because it's a change, that should be reverted, or documented. didou M. Sokolewicz wrote: Torsten Roehr wrote: Morten Rønseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I just tried the example code at http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3 The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have vanished into thin air. I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name of the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do not want to overload the sperclass' method. I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it, PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request? There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5... Cheers, -Morten Hi guys, I guess it's time to risk asking on php-dev ;) I will try my luck. Let's see what the gurus say! Regards, Torsten why do you think they'd respond with something else than ask at php.generals ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: php style guides
Jason Barnett wrote: Tim Burgan wrote: Hi everyone, What 'rules' do you follow about styling/formatting your PHP code? Do you follow a guide that is available online? sacred_cow_warningPlease do not flame me here, different strokes for different folks!/sacred_cow_warning :-) ... And that's fine. The main thing is: aim for consistency of your coding standards. That way when you look through an entire project it's easy to see what's going on. thats probably the best advice so far! ... Personally I don't mix and match HTML with my PHP code. I am extremely lazy and enjoy finding PHP code available that will do all of the echo'ing for HTML I want to build. The PEAR package HTML_Quickform is a I am pretty good at PHP and I have tried using the HTML_Quickform package, I thought it was a nightmare. don't get me wrong the idea is great! It took me days to get a form working that ammounted to a very simple comment/email form, something that should take very little time as it is (and the idea of the package is to speed this kind of thing up). AFAIKT HTML_Quickform excels at abstracting complex, multipage forms but its got a steep learning curve. I DO NOT RECOMMEND BEGINNERS USING IT, first fully understand the concepts and problems that HTML_Quickform trys to address then give it a shot to see if it meets your need. I-DONT-CARE-IF-YOU-FLAME-ME That was my personal opinion, if it hurts your feels flame on, you will be ignored ;-) /I-DONT-CARE-IF-YOU-FLAME-ME good example here; it solves a common problem (building an MVC form) for me in a way that is faster than coding it all out by hand. That is, once you know how to use the package. (There are loads of other packages out there as well; this is but one example.) But if you look at your HTML as a template (which it pretty much is) for your front end and you view PHP as your logic back-end (which it is) then mixing them together is fine. Separating presentation and logic is generally a good idea; this way you can easily change the way it looks oh boy, talk about opening a can or worms :-) without breaking functionality (or vice versa). Although if/when I do it this way I try to make it pretty obvious what I'm trying to accomplish. html head?php include 'functions.php'; ?/head body h1?php getHeader1(); ?/h1 h2Hello ?php getUserName(); ?! How are you doing this fine day?/h2 /body /html that is a nice example of using well named functions (goes for classes,vars,constants,etc as well) to make your code transparent -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: use of curly braces with string interpolation.
M. Sokolewicz wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
...
I always use curly braces around vars placed in double quoted strings,
I do this for 2 reasons:
1. I believe It helps the engine because the var delimitation is
explicit, and this means the interpolation is (should be?) faster.
consider that belief destroyed!
it's just as fast as not using it. The delimiter with variables is
simply the $[a-zA-Z_\x7f-\xff][a-zA-Z0-9_\x7f-\xff]* part. Simple
variables (scalar) are described using the above, it doesn't make it
faster to put more around em. Adding {} around array's/objects shouldn't
make it faster, since it's still just taking the entire thing as a
variable until it comes acress a character that either delimits the
whole thing, or is simply not allowed there.
ok, thanks for the insight!
2. it looks nice (easier to read!)
I think it looks ugly... but it's a simple matter of personal taste ;)
hihi :) (touché)
actually one of the reasons I find it easier to read is that (some of)
my texteditor highlight curly-brace-delimited strings. secondly I seem
to have trained myself to scan for the curlies.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP5 Exception tutorial
Does anybody know a good PHP5 Exception Tutorial that explain this new function step by step? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: php style guides
Something I've laboured over for years, in various languages (same issue in perl, ASP, JSP...). My personal preference depends on how much of what is being dumped. If it's a really simple page, then do it in line, I tend to indent it as a seperate tree to the php code (ie there are two staggers). However if it's a longer page or includes loads of javascript or dynamically built tables etc, then I tend to keep the html in another file wrapped up as php functions with a UI_ prefix. This does make it a bit slower (calling loads of functions), but the maintenance is loads easier and it leaves the main code tree legible! All down to personal preference though. The only hard and fast rule is to keep it consistent and comment well so that when you pick it up again a few months down the line you can still maintain it! eg ? include ./...displayFunctions.php; nest1 ... nest2 UI_tableRow($arrayOfElements); more nest2 code UI_tableEnd; more nest1 code ... ? Tom But what I'm really wanting to get everyones thoughts about is in regard to combining PHP with HTML. I used to do: ?php echo blah; ?h1test/h1?php echo blah; ? but just tried ?php echo 'blah'; echo 'h1test/h1'; echo 'blah'; ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [Fwd: [PHP-INSTALL] Install of PHP 5.0.3 Error]
Kelly wrote: I have installed PHP 5.0.3 on an Intel box running Apache 1.3 with a Solaris 9 x86 OS. When I try to restart the Apache server I get this error: Syntax error on line 249 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: /usr/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol xmlRelaxNGCleanupTypes: referenced symbol not found I looked up on the PHP bugs website and it says the error is not a bug it is bogus. It says the problem is UNIX maintenance. It seems if you have two 'libxml2' versions on the system you will get this error. It says to delete the older version and Apache will start. I found a version at '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml' and '/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml'. I deleted the entire directory '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml'. So you deleted the 'include' directory, but what about the corresponding .so file which is probably still hanging around, still being found, and still being loaded... Only now you have 1 and 1/2 installations instead of 2, so it's *REALLY* messed up. :-) I still get the same error. I decided OK maybe I should recompile PHP now that the other version is gone. I can do a './configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache/bin/apxs'. After I do the configure and enter 'make' it says make: not found. So not only can I not get past the error now I cannot even re-compile. What am I doing wrong. Is there a registry like componant to Solaris I need to change to show the old version is gone? Any help out there for me? I dunno about Solaris, but under Linux one would do 'ldconfig' to re-load the available set of libraries. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Morten Rønseth wrote:
Hi,
I just tried the example code at
http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3
The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have
vanished into thin air.
as a side note - using a function like debug_backtrace() seems to be a
mis-use -- the debug_ prefix is a pretty clear indication that this is
to retrieve info for helping you figure out what is wrong, and therefore
it probably not a good idea to write code that relies on its output in a
production env.
I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this
thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name of
the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do not
want to overload the sperclass' method.
that probably wouldn't solve the problem unless you duplicate the whole
function...
what about doing this in the superclass
yourFunc( $className = '' )
{
if (empty($className)) {
$className = __CLASS__;
}
return parent::yourFunc( $className );
}
not perfect, but it would allow you to stack the classes and minimize
the code in the overloaded funcs. obviously the original func would use
the argument to determine which class it was called by. hopefully you
get the idea.
I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it,
actually I agree - but then I'm no expert :-)
PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request?
calling PHP5 lame is a little harsh - one 'missing' feature is not the
end of the world - and there are work around.
feature requests are done via the bugs DB:
http://bugs.php.net/
take the time to thoroughly investigate the DB for similar requests
first though, to avoid duplication. Also you may want to politely
inquire at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before you do so - possibly they
may have some clarification or could point you to earlier discussions
that explain the current developer stance.
There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5...
well if you can write C then definitely - you write it, and submit a
patch - even if its not accepted you can roll your own version. :-)
Cheers,
-Morten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Checking if
Bruno B B Magalhães wrote:
Richard,
my solution right know is:
if(substr($url,-1) != '/')
{
$url = $url.'/';
}
Simple and fast... :)
$url = preg_replace (|^(.*)/?$|, \\1/, $url);
Regards,
Bruno B B Magalhaes
On Jan 12, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
Bruno B B Magalhães wrote:
how to determine if the last char of a string is a '/'...
The problem, a webpage can be accessed by www.domain.com/page.php or
www.domain.com/page.php/
In addition to the two fine answers posted so far:
if ($string[strlen($string)-1] == '/'){
echo It ends in '/'BR\n;
}
else{
echo It does NOT end in '/'BR\n;
}
substr and the above will be fastest, if it matters (probably not). The
different in performance between substr and array reference is
negligible,
I think.
preg_match is more flexible if you need to maybe some day figure out the
last several letters in weird combinations.
substr will be useful if you might some day need more letters, but not in
weird combinations.
The array usage may be more natural if you are already tearing apart the
string character by character in other bits of the same code.
YMMV
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
Cheers,
-Morten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Offline working
Lester Caine wrote: Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because of the problems working with the email version of the php what problems do you have with the email version? from what you say, and other concur, the news version is much more of a drag! -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] sendmail crash
Hi
I am having a problem with sendmail. It gives me a segfault when I use the
Mail and Mail_Mime package right when I call sendmail.
I am using the following params
Array
(
[host] = localhost
[port] = 25
[auth] = 1
[username] = account
[password] = secret
[sendmail_path] = /path/to/sendmail
)
Then I prepare and call the send command
$hdrs = array(
'From'= $from,
'Subject' = Confirmation for $person-FIRST_NAME
$person-LAST_NAME,
'Bcc' = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
);
$mime = new Mail_mime($crlf);
$text=text;
$html=htmlbodytext/body/html;
$mime-setTXTBody($text);
$mime-setHTMLBody($html);
$mail = Mail::factory('sendmail', $params);
return $mail-send($person-EMAIL, $hdrs, $body);
Result: Apache error messages:
emalloc: cannot allocate ... bytes
and also
erealloc: cannot allocate ... bytes
I just upgraded to php 4.3.10 on FreeBSD.
any ideas?
Michiel
--
Kind regards,
Michiel
*
Michiel van der Blonk
CaribMedia Marketing Consultancy N.V.
Oranjestad, Aruba
Tel: (297) 583-4144 Fax: (297) 582-6102
http://www.caribmedia.com
Website Design, Web Application Development,
Web Hosting, Internet Marketing
Operators of:
Visit Aruba - http://www.VisitAruba.com
Aruba Links - http://www.ArubaLinks.com
Aruba Business Directory - http://www.visitaruba.com/business/
Aruba Real Estate Locator - http://www.arubarealestate.com
Aruba Bulletin Board - http://bb.visitaruba.com/
Aruba Trip Reports - http://tripreports.visitaruba.com
Aruba Chat - http://chat.visitaruba.com
The VisitAruba Plus SAVINGS CARD - http://www.visitaruba.com/plus/
Contents of this communication are confidential and legally privileged. This
document is intended solely for use of the individual(s) or entity/entities
to whom it is addr
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP5 Exception tutorial
Thomas Munz wrote: Does anybody know a good PHP5 Exception Tutorial that explain this new function step by step? http://www.zend.com/php5/articles/php5-exceptions.php http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/classException.html http://be.php.net/manual/en/language.exceptions.php next google first would you, or bother to explain what you have read already. I'll assume you haven't read anything or bothered to search so for good measure just for you... RTFM. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Mehdi Achour wrote: Because it's a change, that should be reverted, or documented. don't top post - its bad form and many people ignore topposts. Mehdi is right to say that debug_backtrace() has changed - but so has the whole engine - I don't think that function was ever meant to be used in the way Morten was (or was it Torsten?). its clearly for debugging, no? and yeah, everything should be documented - but are you going to do? :-) didou ... why do you think they'd respond with something else than ask at php.generals ? bogus! - this is not a case of someone not knowing/understanding existing functionality. its a case of him missing something which quite a few people think should be available to PHP users, ofcourse the developers are entitled to disagree. actually I read php-dev like a zealot (brilliant way to learn about php) and I see the chap in question has posted his question and already got one answer... which didn't mention php-general at all ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Offline working
Jochem Maas wrote: Lester Caine wrote: Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: * Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Because of the problems working with the email version of the php what problems do you have with the email version? from what you say, and other concur, the news version is much more of a drag! One that I have asked about on several occasions. ALL of my posts to www.php.net eMail addresses get returned as rejected, any attempt to 'unregister' fails because I can't send the acknowledgment eMail ( SO I still get the email copies as well, just can't reply to them ). I did try registering a new eMail address, but then I have to switch addresses every time I post. I would add that it is ONLY www.php.net that is bouncing my eMails, and I would MUCH prefer the same from PHP. -- Lester Caine - L.S.Caine Electronic Services -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
Marek Kilimajer wrote: Jochem Maas wrote: hi guys, I always use curly braces around vars placed in double quoted strings, I do this for 2 reasons: 1. I believe It helps the engine because the var delimitation is explicit, and this means the interpolation is (should be?) faster. 2. it looks nice (easier to read!) I have tried to test this with a simple script that does a million interations - but I cannot get it to return consistent results - one time with curlies is faster, another its slower. The difference happens at parse time, so if you want to measure any difference execute php script in a loop, not loop inside php script. DOH! nice one Marek, will make an attempt to 'bash' a script together asap (I'm crap at shell scripting! but the challenge is a good one). thanks for the heads up. thinking about what you said, dumping some test code inside an exec() call would have the same effect, no? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: $_GET $_POST simultaneously
Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com wrote: Hello, If I create form like this form name=form action=##_URI_ROOT##/entity/edit.php?a=b method=post input type=hidden name=action value=modify / ... both arrays contain appropriate variables when submitted: ::: $_GET ::: Array ( [a] = b ) ::: $_POST ::: Array ( [action] = modify ... ) Now what I am interested in is if this is valid behaviour regarding HTTP specification and if other platforms support this interference of GET and POST variables in request? Thank your for your answers, Bostjan This is a POST - as the action specifies. However, you have also supplied GET parameters in the URL, so that when PHP parses the URL it will fill in the appropriate GET values. Simple and clean. Cheers, -Morten -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
Symbulos Partners wrote: Brian Dunning wrote: http://www.zipwise.com/ What about UK postcodes? Expensive. There are a few postcode management sites that provide positional data against the post code, but they all cost quite a bit of money. We are working on a cut down version for key areas, with a rough entry for the first part for all post codes, with a few that people will provide fine detail for their own area later. A postcode query to www.multimap.com will give you the relevant coordinates ;) http://www.spanner.org/postcodes/ is something that is already available. -- Lester Caine - L.S.Caine Electronic Services -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Jochem Maas wrote:
Morten Rønseth wrote:
Hi,
I just tried the example code at
http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200307/msg00244.html using PHP 5.0.3
The backtrace doesn't see class b at all, all references to it have
vanished into thin air.
as a side note - using a function like debug_backtrace() seems to be a
mis-use -- the debug_ prefix is a pretty clear indication that this is
to retrieve info for helping you figure out what is wrong, and therefore
it probably not a good idea to write code that relies on its output in a
production env.
I spent days trying to solve this on my own until I happened upon this
thread - it appears that there is no clean way of retrieving the name
of the calling class, in a classmethod defined in the superclass. I do
not want to overload the sperclass' method.
that probably wouldn't solve the problem unless you duplicate the whole
function...
what about doing this in the superclass
yourFunc( $className = '' )
{
if (empty($className)) {
$className = __CLASS__;
}
return parent::yourFunc( $className );
}
I'll have to wait until I get to work tomorrow to check this one out.
But offhand I cannot see it working as I want it to. Sorry.
not perfect, but it would allow you to stack the classes and minimize
the code in the overloaded funcs. obviously the original func would use
the argument to determine which class it was called by. hopefully you
get the idea.
I do not accept that this is misusing the static concept - without it,
actually I agree - but then I'm no expert :-)
PHP 5 seems rather lame. How does one go about making a feature request?
calling PHP5 lame is a little harsh - one 'missing' feature is not the
end of the world - and there are work around.
I feel that this 'missing feature' is a sadly lacking implementation of
the concept and use of classmethods. The gurus/implementors might argue
otherwise, but I believe that being able to tell the class of the
originating call is a logical cause of the static (classmethod) concept
- without it the implementation of classmethods seems incomplete, and
hence lame. I probably should have made this clearer...
Also, I believe that any workaround here is highly undersirable. With
PHP5 we got a very decent object model which made it possible to model
and implement our solutions in a professional way. Overloading in
subclass only to get around a silly misimplemenation of classmethods
is the ghost of versions past...
I'm writing a framework that should do as much work as possible in the
superclass, leaving only tasks specific the the subclass to be
implemented in the subclass. Anything else is mickey mouse.
I bet you can feel the resentment :-)
feature requests are done via the bugs DB:
http://bugs.php.net/
Great! But Torsten already is on this mission, it seems.
take the time to thoroughly investigate the DB for similar requests
first though, to avoid duplication. Also you may want to politely
inquire at [EMAIL PROTECTED] before you do so - possibly they
may have some clarification or could point you to earlier discussions
that explain the current developer stance.
There has to be a way to get this implemented into PHP 5...
well if you can write C then definitely - you write it, and submit a
patch - even if its not accepted you can roll your own version. :-)
I write C well, but I'd rather stick to a standard distro then my own
rolll. Besides, I just don't have the time to do this.
Cheers,
-Morten
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:09:08 +0100, Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm no expert on crypto (and never will be either! designing good crypto is something best left to the very very very very best in terms of computer science) but I think that the following function represents very weak crypto - Feel free to not use it then.. geez. which may very suffice, but one thing that could make the whole lots fall apart is the fact that the key is kept in the function itself - imagine the server has auto source-highlighting for php files (when you add an 's' to a filename), if so anyone can readout your key! Imagine a world where there were no inexperienced sysadmins. oh and Greg, you may just have told the world the key that you are actually using! I made that one up just for the post. And even if I didn't.. good luck finding the data. -- Greg Donald Zend Certified Engineer http://destiney.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call
Jochem Maas wrote: Mehdi Achour wrote: Because it's a change, that should be reverted, or documented. don't top post - its bad form and many people ignore topposts. Mehdi is right to say that debug_backtrace() has changed - but so has the whole engine - I don't think that function was ever meant to be used in the way Morten was (or was it Torsten?). its clearly for debugging, no? Ah - but I was only checking out a previous tip on the subject. I wasn't actually trying to implement a fix using debug_backtrace(). Good heavens, no! It would be far to ineffective. and yeah, everything should be documented - but are you going to do? :-) didou ... why do you think they'd respond with something else than ask at php.generals ? bogus! - this is not a case of someone not knowing/understanding existing functionality. its a case of him missing something which quite a few people think should be available to PHP users, ofcourse the developers are entitled to disagree. actually I read php-dev like a zealot (brilliant way to learn about php) and I see the chap in question has posted his question and already got one answer... which didn't mention php-general at all ;-) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Checking if
Richard,
my solution right know is:
if(substr($url,-1) != '/')
{
$url = $url.'/';
}
Simple and fast... :)
Regards,
Bruno B B Magalhaes
On Jan 12, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
Bruno B B Magalhães wrote:
how to determine if the last char of a string is a '/'...
The problem, a webpage can be accessed by www.domain.com/page.php or
www.domain.com/page.php/
In addition to the two fine answers posted so far:
if ($string[strlen($string)-1] == '/'){
echo It ends in '/'BR\n;
}
else{
echo It does NOT end in '/'BR\n;
}
substr and the above will be fastest, if it matters (probably not).
The
different in performance between substr and array reference is
negligible,
I think.
preg_match is more flexible if you need to maybe some day figure out
the
last several letters in weird combinations.
substr will be useful if you might some day need more letters, but not
in
weird combinations.
The array usage may be more natural if you are already tearing apart
the
string character by character in other bits of the same code.
YMMV
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [Fwd: [PHP-INSTALL] Install of PHP 5.0.3 Error]
Kelly wrote: High Guys, I don't take drugs ;-) I was about to say ask the php-install list - but it looks like you have been there. I have installed PHP 5.0.3 on an Intel box running Apache 1.3 with a Solaris 9 x86 OS. When I try to restart the Apache server I get this error: Syntax error on line 249 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: /usr/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol xmlRelaxNGCleanupTypes: referenced symbol not found I looked up on the PHP bugs website and it says the error is not a bug it is bogus. It says the problem is UNIX maintenance. It seems if you have two 'libxml2' versions on the system you will get this error. It says to delete the older version and Apache will start. I found a version at '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml' and '/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml'. I deleted the entire directory '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml'. I still get the same error. I decided OK maybe I should recompile PHP now that the other version is gone. I can do a './configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache/bin/apxs'. After I do the configure and enter 'make' it says make: not found. So not only can I not get past the error now I cannot even re-compile. What am I doing wrong. Is there a registry like componant to Solaris I need to change to show the old version is gone? Any help out there for me? sure there is. I know next to nothing about solaris (it does not have a registry tho, thats an M$ invented POS for allowing hackers to take over you system and hiding simple configuration settings from the owners of the system ;-), but I know how to google: I tried googling PHP+make: not found+Solaris and came up with: http://www.phpbuilder.com/lists/php-install/272/0279.php in which Rasmus make a comment (which I hope helps you): he may not know you (he doesn't know me!) but I think you should know him (he's an PHP dev and can be credited with being the guy that gave birth to what came to be know as PHP - i.e. he knows his sh**) Kelly -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] SQL Server log file
John Nichel wrote: Zouari Fourat wrote: Hello am new to ms sql server and using it for a while, i where searching where to find sql queries log file ? some one have an idea about it ? There's a php question in there somewhere, right? John, you have to look 'beyond the surface' ;-) seriously though - Microsoft host a little site over at msdn.microsoft.com which may provide useful info. Or what about opening the MSSQL server console and hitting F1? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] php dot net auto complete search engine
Bret Hughes wrote: On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 05:38, Jochem Maas wrote: Richard Davey wrote: ... It's JS (what else could it be?!) - more info here: what else? spontaneous self-realising tele-kinetic voodoo. :-D We used to call that MTAM (Mental Telepathy Access Method) LOL - I knew there was a proper technical term for it! you made my day Brett! Bret -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:51:31 -0500, Jason Barnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No offense intended to you sir... but why do you use a static key in this way instead of using mcrypt? Please forgive my naivete regarding encryption. Because not everyone's PHP is built --with-mcrypt, and not everyone can control how their PHP is built. Think 'many different clients on many different web hosts'. You think I would say to a client that I can't build them a PHP cart because their PHP doesn't have mcrypt support? Umm.. no. -- Greg Donald Zend Certified Engineer http://destiney.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
Jochem Maas wrote: hi guys, I always use curly braces around vars placed in double quoted strings, I do this for 2 reasons: 1. I believe It helps the engine because the var delimitation is explicit, and this means the interpolation is (should be?) faster. 2. it looks nice (easier to read!) I have tried to test this with a simple script that does a million interations - but I cannot get it to return consistent results - one time with curlies is faster, another its slower. The difference happens at parse time, so if you want to measure any difference execute php script in a loop, not loop inside php script. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Checking if
Bruno B B Magalhães wrote:
how to determine if the last char of a string is a '/'...
The problem, a webpage can be accessed by www.domain.com/page.php or
www.domain.com/page.php/
In addition to the two fine answers posted so far:
if ($string[strlen($string)-1] == '/'){
echo It ends in '/'BR\n;
}
else{
echo It does NOT end in '/'BR\n;
}
substr and the above will be fastest, if it matters (probably not). The
different in performance between substr and array reference is negligible,
I think.
preg_match is more flexible if you need to maybe some day figure out the
last several letters in weird combinations.
substr will be useful if you might some day need more letters, but not in
weird combinations.
The array usage may be more natural if you are already tearing apart the
string character by character in other bits of the same code.
YMMV
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
Richard: I found this post incredibly useful. Thank you! Richard Lynch wrote: If you only want close things to a given location, the curvature of the earth is pretty insignificant. ... I realized one day that at a distance of a hundred miles or less, I just didn't *CARE* about curvature of the earth, and replaced that trig with your basic Cartesian distance. Made a *HUGE* difference in performance. ... Put a longitude and latitude column on your existing table, and default it to NULL. Write your business logic so that *ANY* time a zip code is changed, the longitude/latitude is re-set to NULL. (Or use triggers or whatever you want to make this happen. I don't care.) Finally, write a cron job (scheduled task in Windoze) to find N records at random in your table where the long/lat is NULL, and *copy* over the long/lat from the zips table. ... PPS You can pay $$$ for the complete databases of zips, or use the TIGER data for free just interpolate from existing entries to make up long/lats for new zips. EG: If tomorrow the USPS creates zip code 60609, I can be pretty damn sure it's close enough to 60601 through 60608 and just average them to make up bogus long/lat. Sure, it's wrong. It's also FREE and close enough for what I (and almost for sure you) are doing. -- Teach a person to fish... Ask smart questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html PHP Manual: http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php php-general archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2 -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
Brian Dunning wrote: On Jan 11, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Greg Donald wrote: This does not take into account the curve of the earth. In addition you'll need a db with the latitude and longitude for each zip code. If you only want close things to a given location, the curvature of the earth is pretty insignificant. I used to have that long-ass trigonometric formula in a user-defined PostgreSQL function so I could implement geogrphical search here: http://chatmusic.com/venues.htm#search I realized one day that at a distance of a hundred miles or less, I just didn't *CARE* about curvature of the earth, and replaced that trig with your basic Cartesian distance. Made a *HUGE* difference in performance. It always amazes me that I was so foolish as to listen to all the experts who told me I needed this really hairy complex thing when, in reality, what I needed was something MUCH simpler. Oh, and another Free Tip: Once you load in the 65000+ zip codes for the US (plus whatever other countries you need/find) you'll be doing a JOIN with your search table with that. 65000 X (number of records in your table) WAY TOO MANY RECORDS!!! So it's time to break the cardinal rule of good database design. Sort of. Sanely. Put a longitude and latitude column on your existing table, and default it to NULL. Write your business logic so that *ANY* time a zip code is changed, the longitude/latitude is re-set to NULL. (Or use triggers or whatever you want to make this happen. I don't care.) Finally, write a cron job (scheduled task in Windoze) to find N records at random in your table where the long/lat is NULL, and *copy* over the long/lat from the zips table. Now, your search only has to deal with however many records are in your table. Not 65000 *times* that many. You're breaking the rules of database design in a sensible, maintainable way for a HUGE performance gain. Before I figured this out, I must have brought my server to a crawl I don't know how many times with a perfectly reasonable query... that involved millions of intermediary tuples when I really only expected a dozen to actually come out in the end. PPS You can pay $$$ for the complete databases of zips, or use the TIGER data for free just interpolate from existing entries to make up long/lats for new zips. EG: If tomorrow the USPS creates zip code 60609, I can be pretty damn sure it's close enough to 60601 through 60608 and just average them to make up bogus long/lat. Sure, it's wrong. It's also FREE and close enough for what I (and almost for sure you) are doing. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
Brian Dunning wrote: http://www.zipwise.com/ What about UK postcodes? -- symbulos partners -.- symbulos - ethical services for your organisation http://www.symbulos.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] PHP5 sprintf() function borken
I ran your code through 3000 iterations and it always results in 0.09. This is
on Suse 9.2, Apache 2.0.52 and php 5.0.3
From: Thomas Munz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/01/11 Tue AM 11:10:37 EST
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] PHP5 sprintf() function borken
Today i think i found an bu in the PHP5 version 5.0.3 ( allready exits also
in
the version 5.0.2 , i try this version also ).
When tryo one of this scripts:
$i_test = 0.085007667542;
$tm_total = sprintf('%.2f', $i_test);
echo $tm_total;
$i_test = 0.085007667542;
$tm_total = sprintf('%.2f', $i_test);
echo $tm_total;
$i_test = 0.085007667542;
$tm_total = sprintf('%.2f', floatval($i_test));
echo $tm_total;
i always get an other result. Some time it get a result like that:
-2681561585988522000.00
my friend try it also and have the same problems...
is that a bug in php5?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
So often php-general is graced with the presence of people with multiple personalities.. or are you really the borg? :) What?? Any body has any experience with anything similar? I coded a zip code to distance calculater last week. x = 69.1 * ( zip2.lat - zip1.lat ) y = 69.1 * ( zip2.lon - zip1.lon ) * cos( zip1.lat / 57.3 ) miles = sqrt( x^2 + y^2 ) This does not take into account the curve of the earth. In addition you'll need a db with the latitude and longitude for each zip code. Does it work for UK postcodes? Where do you find UK post codes to latitude databases? -- symbulos partners -.- symbulos - ethical services for your organisation http://www.symbulos.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] drag and drop CMS made with php
Graham Anderson wrote: is there a php based CMS that exists that allows you to drag/drop and reorder tracks ? something akin to itunes or winamp playlist... I want users to be able to the change 'order_id' field in the 'PlaylistItems' table...basically a bunch of UPDATE statements to a found set. Basically, the user drags a playlist record and moves it to another area in the playlist... does this allready exist somewhere? There's nothing in PHP/HTML that does this with drag-n-drop... You're looking at JavaScript or Flash (possibly Ming created by PHP) to get that. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Data Enryption
Greg Donald wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:13:08 -, Shaun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have site that allows users to upload private information to our server.
We would like to encrypt the data for security reasons and only allow
certain users to be able to un-encrypt the data and view it. I have looked
at the PHP encryption functions and they appear to be one way algorithms - I
am guessing this is the whole point of encrption ;)
Does anyone have any suggestions regarding this?
I'm no expert on crypto (and never will be either! designing good crypto
is something best left to the very very very very best in terms of
computer science) but I think that the following function represents
very weak crypto - which may very suffice, but one thing that could make
the whole lots fall apart is the fact that the key is kept in the
function itself - imagine the server has auto source-highlighting for
php files (when you add an 's' to a filename), if so anyone can readout
your key!
that was not meant as a 'dis', I just wanted to point out that crypto is
very hard to get right.
oh and Greg, you may just have told the world the key that you are
actually using!
function encrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) + ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
function decrypt( $string )
{
$key = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
$result = '';
for( $i = 1; $i = strlen( $string ); $i++ )
{
$char = substr( $string, $i - 1, 1 );
$keychar = substr( $key, ( $i % strlen( $key ) ) - 1, 1 );
$char = chr( ord( $char ) - ord( $keychar ) );
$result .= $char;
}
return $result;
}
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Error loading extension dlls in WindosXP for PHP4.3.10
Well Richard, I could able to solve it by copying all dlls into Windows\System32 directory. But still not sure why I need to copy all dlls into system32 directory though I have mentioned in php.ini file that extension_directory=c:\PHP4\extensions. What does ?php phpinfo();? say about your php.ini file? -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] SQL Server log file
just to help out, you might wanna try and use the Profiler under the MS SQL programs group http://jonel.road14.com -- I not know English well, but I know 7 computer languages. anonymous On Jan 12, 2005, at 7:54 AM, Zouari Fourat wrote: Hello am new to ms sql server and using it for a while, i where searching where to find sql queries log file ? some one have an idea about it ? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP + MSSQL win32
Hi I try to use PHP with MSSQL on a WINXP station. Usually, on win32 systems this works very well, but today I can't understand the problem. I can connect and execute SELECT statements When I try to INSERT , DELETE or UPDATE a record, I have a PHP ERROR, and a MSSQL error code 15457 in the mssql logs The insert executes, but I would like not to have the php error... This seem to be a problem with grants or permissions, but I can't find where. Even if I log with the 'sa' account I have the error. I use PHP 4.3.10 and MSSQL2000 on winXP pro Any tip would be nice. Moreover, I have found a ini file parameter that is not documented : mssql.datetimeconvert=Off Do you know what does this mean?? Thank you Vincent
RE: [PHP] drag and drop CMS made with php
Andrew Kreps mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:45 PM said: I'm not entirely sure you could make this work, if you're speaking of a web app. [snip] I also think it would be entirely browser dependent, which can't be a good thing. It sounds like a lot of work to me, although you might have fun creating it. :) And let's not forget that it wouldn't be PHP doing any of the dragging and/or dropping. Chris. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] URL-funtion - returnvalue into variable...?
Hello Wiberg, Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 1:40:26 AM, you wrote: W Another company wants me to access their productinfo thorugh URL, something W like this: W https://www.anothercompany.com/returnValueOfProductID=1043 Oddly enough I just happened to run across something that might be useful while looking for something else completely. grin http://www.tutorio.com/tutorial/php-alternative-to-mod-rewrite-for-se-friendly-urls Once the page loads, scroll down a bit. There's a weird navigator. -- Leif (TB lists moderator and fellow end user). Using The Bat! 3.0.2.3 Rush under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 on a Pentium 4 2GHz with 512MB -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [Fwd: [PHP-INSTALL] Install of PHP 5.0.3 Error]
I found other things about this online doing google. I have not fixed it though. I can get apache to start but PHP will not parse any variables. It does does remove the code so I know it is running and the mail() function can be done. It just does not contain any variable information. I did an ldd and it showed this: Any help? ldd -r /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so libresolv.so.2 =/usr/lib/libresolv.so.2 libm.so.1 = /usr/lib/libm.so.1 libdl.so.1 =/usr/lib/libdl.so.1 libnsl.so.1 = /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1 libsocket.so.1 =/usr/lib/libsocket.so.1 libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 libxml2.so.2 = /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.2 libiconv.so.2 = /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2 libc.so.1 = /usr/lib/libc.so.1 libmp.so.2 =/usr/lib/libmp.so.2 libpthread.so.1 = /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1 = /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 symbol not found: ap_user_id (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_group_id (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_user_name (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_max_requests_per_child (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_server_root (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: top_module (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_loaded_modules (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_block_alarms (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_unblock_alarms (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_rwrite (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_rflush (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_should_client_block (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_signal (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_hard_timeout (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_get_client_block (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_reset_timeout (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_table_get (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_pstrdup (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_table_set (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_table_add (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_send_http_header (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_log_error (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_block_alarms (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_register_cleanup (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_unblock_alarms (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_setup_client_block (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_add_common_vars (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_add_cgi_vars (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_getword (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_uudecode (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_getword_nulls_nc (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_auth_type (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_kill_timeout (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_update_mtime (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_set_last_modified (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_set_etag (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_add_version_component (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_child_terminate (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_get_server_version (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_sub_req_lookup_uri (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_destroy_sub_req (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_run_sub_req (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_pstrndup (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) symbol not found: ap_table_setn (/usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so) libthread.so.1 =/usr/lib/libthread.so.1 Kelly Kelly wrote: I have installed PHP 5.0.3 on an Intel box running Apache 1.3 with a Solaris 9 x86 OS. When I try to restart the Apache server I get this
Re: [PHP] use of curly braces with string interpolation.
Jochem Maas wrote: Marek Kilimajer wrote: The difference happens at parse time, so if you want to measure any difference execute php script in a loop, not loop inside php script. DOH! nice one Marek, will make an attempt to 'bash' a script together asap (I'm crap at shell scripting! but the challenge is a good one). thanks for the heads up. thinking about what you said, dumping some test code inside an exec() call would have the same effect, no? Right, you don't need bash scripting for this, you can use php for just about anything now ;) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] [Fwd: [PHP-INSTALL] Install of PHP 5.0.3 Error]
Kelly wrote: I found other things about this online doing google. I have not fixed it though. I can get apache to start but PHP will not parse any variables. It does does remove the code so I know it is running and the mail() function can be done. It just does not contain any variable information. I did an ldd and it showed this: Any help? This sounds like you now have register_globals OFF and you expect it to be ON. Fix your code. I believe everything below is now irrelevent... Kelly wrote: I have installed PHP 5.0.3 on an Intel box running Apache 1.3 with a Solaris 9 x86 OS. When I try to restart the Apache server I get this error: Syntax error on line 249 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf: Cannot load /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so into server: ld.so.1: /usr/apache/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/apache/libexec/libphp5.so: symbol xmlRelaxNGCleanupTypes: referenced symbol not found I looked up on the PHP bugs website and it says the error is not a bug it is bogus. It says the problem is UNIX maintenance. It seems if you have two 'libxml2' versions on the system you will get this error. It says to delete the older version and Apache will start. I found a version at '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml' and '/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml'. I deleted the entire directory '/usr/include/libxml2/libxml'. So you deleted the 'include' directory, but what about the corresponding .so file which is probably still hanging around, still being found, and still being loaded... Only now you have 1 and 1/2 installations instead of 2, so it's *REALLY* messed up. :-) I still get the same error. I decided OK maybe I should recompile PHP now that the other version is gone. I can do a './configure --with-apxs=/usr/apache/bin/apxs'. After I do the configure and enter 'make' it says make: not found. So not only can I not get past the error now I cannot even re-compile. What am I doing wrong. Is there a registry like componant to Solaris I need to change to show the old version is gone? Any help out there for me? I dunno about Solaris, but under Linux one would do 'ldconfig' to re-load the available set of libraries. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm Kelly -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Global Postal
Is anybody aware of any existing world-wide data-collection effort of postal codes in relation to geogrpahical coordinates (long/lat)? Not unlike the commercial data sets only: A) Open Source, Open Content (Commons Content? Whatever.) B) World-wide. At the granularity of *JUST* postal code - long/lat I'm *not* interested in niche database engines for geo-data on the scale and scope of MapQuest et al, thank you very much. Just: country_code + postal_code (long, lat) in a one-to-one relationship, as crude as that might be. K.I.S.S. You put in your home-town, and I'll put in mine, and we'll all share, okay? Assuming the answer is No is anybody interested in collaborating on such a project with me and a colleague? We're looking at a VERY simple distributed data network model, with all source and content being OpenSource/CommonContent, and very simplistic access rules for how you can build/share content with others. It's 2005. Shouldn't any web-site anywhere be able to plug in [a subset of] this data and just run with it already? Aren't there enough developers who have re-invented this wheel, and have sufficient data they collected themselves (or could collect) to just build an OPEN data set? If a Little Guy like me needs world-wide data set, surely others also do. Duh. Did I mention we're coding this in PHP, so it *is* (somewhat) on-topic to this list? That said, just contact me off-list if you're interested. Please include specific skills/areas of development, and outline the scope of any dataset for which YOU own copyrights. No, we do *NOT* want to steal copyrighted data. Can you do CVS? Write PHP code? Have a server with some bandwidth to spare? Thanks. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] sendmail crash
Michiel van der Blonk wrote:
I am having a problem with sendmail. It gives me a segfault when I use the
Mail and Mail_Mime package right when I call sendmail.
I am using the following params
Array
(
[host] = localhost
[port] = 25
[auth] = 1
[username] = account
[password] = secret
[sendmail_path] = /path/to/sendmail
)
Then I prepare and call the send command
$hdrs = array(
'From'= $from,
'Subject' = Confirmation for $person-FIRST_NAME
$person-LAST_NAME,
'Bcc' = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
);
$mime = new Mail_mime($crlf);
$text=text;
$html=htmlbodytext/body/html;
$mime-setTXTBody($text);
$mime-setHTMLBody($html);
$mail = Mail::factory('sendmail', $params);
return $mail-send($person-EMAIL, $hdrs, $body);
Result: Apache error messages:
emalloc: cannot allocate ... bytes
and also
erealloc: cannot allocate ... bytes
Is the above the ACTUAL email you are sending?
Or merely a demonstrative sample?
Cuz, like, if the email you are REALLY sending is *HUGE* then I'd not be
surprised by the messages above...
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] geographic search engine
What about UK postcodes? I don't have a source for that - looked into it once and it was too expensive. And I thought the USPS charged obscene prices... -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
