php-general Digest 30 Mar 2012 06:23:29 -0000 Issue 7752
php-general Digest 30 Mar 2012 06:23:29 - Issue 7752
Topics (messages 317338 through 317362):
Watch out for automatic type casting
317338 by: Arno Kuhl
317342 by: Simon Schick
317344 by: Simon Schick
317345 by: Stuart Dallas
317351 by: tamouse mailing lists
Re: DateTime wierdness
317339 by: David OBrien
317340 by: MartÃn Marqués
317341 by: David OBrien
317343 by: David OBrien
317346 by: MartÃn Marqués
317350 by: tamouse mailing lists
Re: [PHP-DB] Flow of PHP testClass
317347 by: tamouse mailing lists
317348 by: tamouse mailing lists
317349 by: tamouse mailing lists
pcntl_fork behavior with php version 5.1.2
317352 by: Ralf Gnädinger
317353 by: Jim Lucas
317354 by: Stuart Dallas
317355 by: Ralf Gnädinger
317356 by: Ralf Gnädinger
Updating Google Plus
317357 by: Brian Dunning
317358 by: Stuart Dallas
317359 by: Brian Dunning
317360 by: Stuart Dallas
317361 by: Brian Dunning
PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released
317362 by: Stas Malyshev
Administrivia:
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net
To post to the list, e-mail:
php-gene...@lists.php.net
--
---BeginMessage---
I found automatic typecasting can be a bit of a gotcha.
$sText = this.is.a.test.text;
if ( $pos = strpos($sText, test) !== FALSE) {
echo substr($sText, 0, $pos)..substr($sText, $pos,
strlen(test))..substr($sText, $pos+strlen(test));
}
The code seems logical enough, and the expected result would be:
this.is.a.test.text
In fact it ends up being:
this.is.a.test.text
The reason is $pos is typecast as TRUE, not int 10, presumably because it's
in the same scope as the boolean test.
Then when $pos is later used as an int it's converted from TRUE to 1.
You have to bracket the $pos setting to move it into its own scope to
prevent it being typecast:
if ( ($pos = strpos($sText, test)) !== FALSE) {
No doubt it's mentioned somewhere in the php manual, I just never came
across it.
Just thought I'd highlight one of the gotchas of auto typecasting for any
other simpletons like me.
Cheers
Arno
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi, Arno
I don't know if this is written somewhere in the php-manual, but I
really like this table:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Programming_languages
I do not really understand why this has some special stuff to do with
typecasting ... This is just an order like the operators + and * in
math.
If you'd ask me, this is exactly what I would expect to happen.
Bye
Simon
2012/3/29 Arno Kuhl a...@dotcontent.net:
I found automatic typecasting can be a bit of a gotcha.
$sText = this.is.a.test.text;
if ( $pos = strpos($sText, test) !== FALSE) {
echo substr($sText, 0, $pos)..substr($sText, $pos,
strlen(test))..substr($sText, $pos+strlen(test));
}
The code seems logical enough, and the expected result would be:
this.is.a.test.text
In fact it ends up being:
this.is.a.test.text
The reason is $pos is typecast as TRUE, not int 10, presumably because it's
in the same scope as the boolean test.
Then when $pos is later used as an int it's converted from TRUE to 1.
You have to bracket the $pos setting to move it into its own scope to
prevent it being typecast:
if ( ($pos = strpos($sText, test)) !== FALSE) {
No doubt it's mentioned somewhere in the php manual, I just never came
across it.
Just thought I'd highlight one of the gotchas of auto typecasting for any
other simpletons like me.
Cheers
Arno
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi, Arno
FYI: I found a page in the php-manual that's exactly for that:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php
p.s. some of them were also new to me Thanks for getting me to read it.
Bye
Simon
2012/3/29 Simon Schick simonsimc...@googlemail.com:
Hi, Arno
I don't know if this is written somewhere in the php-manual, but I
really like this table:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations#Programming_languages
I do not really understand why this has some special stuff to do with
typecasting ... This is just an order like the operators + and * in
math.
If you'd ask me, this is exactly what I would expect to happen.
Bye
Simon
2012/3/29 Arno Kuhl a...@dotcontent.net:
I found automatic typecasting can be a bit of a gotcha.
$sText = this.is.a.test.text;
if ( $pos = strpos($sText, test) !== FALSE) {
echo substr($sText, 0, $pos)..substr($sText, $pos,
strlen(test))..substr($sText, $pos+strlen(test));
}
The code seems logical enough, and the expected result would be:
this.is.a.test.text
In
php-general Digest 30 Mar 2012 21:39:48 -0000 Issue 7753
php-general Digest 30 Mar 2012 21:39:48 - Issue 7753 Topics (messages 317363 through 317380): Re: Watch out for automatic type casting 317363 by: Arno Kuhl 317365 by: Arno Kuhl PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released 317364 by: Stas Malyshev request for feedback on logAndHandler 317366 by: rene7705 317367 by: marco.behnke.biz 317372 by: rene7705 securing a script that exec()s 317368 by: rene7705 317370 by: Bastien 317371 by: David OBrien 317373 by: Peter Bauer 317374 by: David OBrien 317375 by: rene7705 317377 by: Mike Mackintosh Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released 317369 by: Nikita Popov Surge 2012 CFP is Open! 317376 by: Katherine Jeschke PHP preg_replace_callback with unicode 317378 by: Jimmy Chen Re: Thinking out loud - a continuation... 317379 by: Robert Cummings Re: Node.PHP 317380 by: Hiyarli Baba Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: php-general-digest-subscr...@lists.php.net To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: php-general-digest-unsubscr...@lists.php.net To post to the list, e-mail: php-gene...@lists.php.net -- ---BeginMessage--- -Original Message- From: Simon Schick [mailto:simonsimc...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 March 2012 07:19 PM To: a...@dotcontent.net Cc: php-gene...@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting Hi, Arno FYI: I found a page in the php-manual that's exactly for that: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php p.s. some of them were also new to me Thanks for getting me to read it. Bye Simon Thanks Simon and others, thought it was typecasting, but precedence makes more sense. I remember seeing that table when I first started using php, which is why I always use AND and OR rather than and || because it's lower precedence than the assignment and the ternary operators, but I couldn't remember where I'd seen it. So thanks for linking to it. Cheers Arno ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- -Original Message- From: Simon Schick [mailto:simonsimc...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 March 2012 07:19 PM To: a...@dotcontent.net Cc: php-gene...@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting Hi, Arno FYI: I found a page in the php-manual that's exactly for that: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php p.s. some of them were also new to me Thanks for getting me to read it. Bye Simon Thanks Simon and others, thought it was typecasting, but precedence makes more sense. I remember seeing that table when I first started using php, which is why I always use AND and OR rather than and || because it's lower precedence than the assignment and the ternary operators, but I couldn't remember where I'd seen it. So thanks for linking to it. Cheers Arno -- BTW interesting to note on that precedence page that ! has a higher precedence than = (which you'd expect it to be) but you can still do if (!$a = foo()) I use that form often (as I'm sure many others do) and just took it for granted that it works even though the order of precedence says it shouldn't. It could be expanded to if ($a = foo() != TRUE) But that wouldn't get the expected result due to order of precedence, though at first glance you could reasonably expect it to work because of if (!$a = foo()) being valid. I think that's why it's so easy to be caught out (at least for me) by the similar form of if ( $pos = strpos($sText, test) !== FALSE) Cheers Arno ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi! We would like to announce the first RC of the 5.4.1 version. This is mainly a bugfix release, including all fixes that did not make the cut for 5.4.0 and new issues since then. Please test it and notify us of any problems you may encounter. The full list of the fixes is as always in the NEWS file. You can download the packages from: http://downloads.php.net/stas The Windows team provides windows binaries for the release. As always you find them at: http://windows.php.net/qa/ This is also the first release we are making from our brand new Git setup, please tell us if you notice any glitches. You can read more about the Git migration here: http://www.php.net/archive/2012.php#id2012-03-20-1 We plan the next RC for 5.4.1 in two weeks, on April 12th. Regards, Stas David ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi. I've recently got rid of some bugs in an older component of mine called logAndHandler. Basically, logAndHandler will catch errors, warning and notices in PHP code and present them in an attractive interface in the browser. Although it does not work in Internet Explorer, and may never work in that browser, I still find it useful for development purposes. I thought now would be a good time to get some early feedback on what else
[PHP] PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released
Hi! We would like to announce the first RC of the 5.4.1 version. This will be mainly a bugfix version, including all bugfixes that did not make the cut for 5.4.0 and new issues since then. Please test it and notify us of any problems you may encounter. The full list of the fixes is as always in the NEWS file. You can download the packages from: http://downloads.php.net/stas The Windows team provides windows binaries for the release. As always you find them at: http://windows.php.net/qa/ This is also the first release we are making from our brand new Git setup, please tell us if you notice any glitches. You can read more about the Git migration here: http://www.php.net/archive/2012.php#id2012-03-20-1 We plan the next RC for 5.4.1 in two weeks, on April 5th. Regards, Stas David -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting
-Original Message- From: Simon Schick [mailto:simonsimc...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 March 2012 07:19 PM To: a...@dotcontent.net Cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting Hi, Arno FYI: I found a page in the php-manual that's exactly for that: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php p.s. some of them were also new to me Thanks for getting me to read it. Bye Simon Thanks Simon and others, thought it was typecasting, but precedence makes more sense. I remember seeing that table when I first started using php, which is why I always use AND and OR rather than and || because it's lower precedence than the assignment and the ternary operators, but I couldn't remember where I'd seen it. So thanks for linking to it. Cheers Arno -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released
Hi! We would like to announce the first RC of the 5.4.1 version. This is mainly a bugfix release, including all fixes that did not make the cut for 5.4.0 and new issues since then. Please test it and notify us of any problems you may encounter. The full list of the fixes is as always in the NEWS file. You can download the packages from: http://downloads.php.net/stas The Windows team provides windows binaries for the release. As always you find them at: http://windows.php.net/qa/ This is also the first release we are making from our brand new Git setup, please tell us if you notice any glitches. You can read more about the Git migration here: http://www.php.net/archive/2012.php#id2012-03-20-1 We plan the next RC for 5.4.1 in two weeks, on April 12th. Regards, Stas David -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting
-Original Message- From: Simon Schick [mailto:simonsimc...@googlemail.com] Sent: 29 March 2012 07:19 PM To: a...@dotcontent.net Cc: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Watch out for automatic type casting Hi, Arno FYI: I found a page in the php-manual that's exactly for that: http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php p.s. some of them were also new to me Thanks for getting me to read it. Bye Simon Thanks Simon and others, thought it was typecasting, but precedence makes more sense. I remember seeing that table when I first started using php, which is why I always use AND and OR rather than and || because it's lower precedence than the assignment and the ternary operators, but I couldn't remember where I'd seen it. So thanks for linking to it. Cheers Arno -- BTW interesting to note on that precedence page that ! has a higher precedence than = (which you'd expect it to be) but you can still do if (!$a = foo()) I use that form often (as I'm sure many others do) and just took it for granted that it works even though the order of precedence says it shouldn't. It could be expanded to if ($a = foo() != TRUE) But that wouldn't get the expected result due to order of precedence, though at first glance you could reasonably expect it to work because of if (!$a = foo()) being valid. I think that's why it's so easy to be caught out (at least for me) by the similar form of if ( $pos = strpos($sText, test) !== FALSE) Cheers Arno -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] request for feedback on logAndHandler
rene7705 rene7...@gmail.com hat am 30. März 2012 um 11:29 geschrieben: I thought now would be a good time to get some early feedback on what else I can improve for this component, at least from an end-user perspective (I haven't yet updated the download zip on http://mediabeez.ws with these latest changes). First of all this is only my opinion but you should not mistaken this maillist for a review my extension list. This a discussion group about PHP. I think there are proper places on the internet for that. Most people reading this list will have no interest in reading a discussion about stuff they are not interested in it. I suggest you set up a github project, groogle group or whatever wiki/forum you like where people interested in it can post and discuss. Then you can send a mail to this list where you announce your discussion group. So there is no dicussion on this list and you can promote your work to be discussed. Just my 2 cents on that. Regards, Marco -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] securing a script that exec()s
Hi.
I have a script that uses imagemagick's convert command on the commandline
to get it's work done.
These calls to exec('convert [params]') take params from the end-user via a
html form, so is very unsecure.
The intention is that the end-user only runs this script on localhost, from
localhost.
So now i'm checking $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']===$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] to
see if I can allow the script to be used.
But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and
$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP.
How would I best fix this?
[PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4.1 RC1 Released
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote: Hi! We would like to announce the first RC of the 5.4.1 version. This will be mainly a bugfix version, including all bugfixes that did not make the cut for 5.4.0 and new issues since then. Please test it and notify us of any problems you may encounter. Hey Stas! Does this mean that the 5.4 branch is frozen now and one should ask a PM before committing? Nikita -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
Bastien Koert
On 2012-03-30, at 5:56 AM, rene7705 rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have a script that uses imagemagick's convert command on the commandline
to get it's work done.
These calls to exec('convert [params]') take params from the end-user via a
html form, so is very unsecure.
The intention is that the end-user only runs this script on localhost, from
localhost.
So now i'm checking $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']===$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] to
see if I can allow the script to be used.
But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and
$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP.
How would I best fix this?
Validate the data?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
Find a way to do it using PHP's imagemagick extensions
http://php.net/manual/en/book.imagick.php
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:56 AM, rene7705 rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have a script that uses imagemagick's convert command on the commandline
to get it's work done.
These calls to exec('convert [params]') take params from the end-user via a
html form, so is very unsecure.
The intention is that the end-user only runs this script on localhost, from
localhost.
So now i'm checking $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']===$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] to
see if I can allow the script to be used.
But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and
$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP.
How would I best fix this?
[PHP] Re: request for feedback on logAndHandler
bit bad timing, but i've decided to try out ubuntu instead of windows on that skatescene.biz machine.. i'll try to have the test url up asap or move it to my hoster within a few hours.
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:56:41AM +0200, rene7705 wrote: ... But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and $_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP. How would I best fix this? Simply log on your box via ssh (if its a unix system) and run your script from console or with textmode browser lynx. But the best solution would be to secure the exec call. -- Regards, Peter Bauer PHP developer -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
Sender: dgobr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
Message-Id: CAF=yD_3efQkA_kz169ooYQ2z7g=g75sjghadnvw+irjzp8q...@mail.gmail.com
Recipient: adam.nicho...@hl.co.uk
__
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
__---BeginMessage---
Find a way to do it using PHP's imagemagick extensions
http://php.net/manual/en/book.imagick.php
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:56 AM, rene7705 rene7...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I have a script that uses imagemagick's convert command on the commandline
to get it's work done.
These calls to exec('convert [params]') take params from the end-user via a
html form, so is very unsecure.
The intention is that the end-user only runs this script on localhost, from
localhost.
So now i'm checking $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']===$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] to
see if I can allow the script to be used.
But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and
$_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP.
How would I best fix this?
---End Message---
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Peter Bauer p...@archivum.info wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:56:41AM +0200, rene7705 wrote: ... But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and $_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP. How would I best fix this? Simply log on your box via ssh (if its a unix system) and run your script from console or with textmode browser lynx. But the best solution would be to secure the exec call. How would I best secure the exec call?
[PHP] Surge 2012 CFP is Open!
Surge 2012, the scalability conference, September 27-28, Baltimore, MD has opened its CFP. Please visit http://omniti.com/surge/2012/cfp for details. -- Katherine Jeschke Director of Marketing and Creative Services OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. 7070 Samuel Morse Drive, Ste.150 Columbia, MD 21046 O: 443-325-1357, 222 F: 410/872-4911 C: 443/643-6140 omniti.com Surge2012: http://omniti.com/surge/2012 PG Corridor Days - DC: http://pgday.bwpug.org/ The information contained in this electronic message and any attached documents is privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, note that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this electronic message or any attached documents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by telephone (1-443-325-1360) or by electronic mail (i...@omniti.com). Thank you. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] securing a script that exec()s
On Mar 30, 2012, at 9:25 AM, rene7705 wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Peter Bauer p...@archivum.info wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:56:41AM +0200, rene7705 wrote: ... But unfortunately, $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'] is my external IP, and $_SERVER['SERVER_ADDR'] is my internal IP. How would I best fix this? Simply log on your box via ssh (if its a unix system) and run your script from console or with textmode browser lynx. But the best solution would be to secure the exec call. How would I best secure the exec call? What would the form input look like? Mike Mackintosh PHP, the drug of choice - www.highonphp.com
[PHP] PHP preg_replace_callback with unicode
I wrote a simple script below to simulate my problem.
Both my string and pattern contain unicode characters.
Basically, if I run it from command line (php -f test.php), it prints
match as expected.
But if I run it through web server (apache, http://localhost/test.php), it
prints no match.
I am using PHP 5.3.
I am sure both use the same php.ini.
Any idea why it behaves differently?
How do I make it work through web server?
Thanks
-
?php
function myCallback($matches) {
return $matches[0]; //do nothing, test only
}
$value = 'aaa äää';
$pattern = '/(\bäää)/u';
$value = preg_replace_callback($pattern, 'myCallback', $value, -1, $count);
if ($count 0) {
echo match;
} else {
echo 'no match';
}
?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Thinking out loud - a continuation...
On 12-03-27 11:11 AM, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]On 3/27/2012 12:21 AM, Robert Cummings wrote:
[-- SNIP --]
Essentially, entries at the root and entries for the children are just
auto indexed array items but the actual entries in those arrays retain
the associative index structure for retrieval of the specific
information. let me know and I can probably whip you up something.
Robert that looks correct. Here is an example of the JSON that the guy
provided for me -
var json = {
id: node02,
name: 0.2,
data: {},
children: [{
id: node13,
name: 1.3,
data: {},
children: [{
id: node24,
name: 2.4,
data: {},
children: [{
id: node35,
name: 3.5,
data: {},
children: [{
id: node46,
name: 4.6,
data: {},
children: []
}]
}, {
id: node37,
name: 3.7,
data: {},
children: [{
id: node48,
name: 4.8,
data: {},
children: []
}, {
id: node49,
name: 4.9,
data: {},
children: []
}, {
id: node410,
name: 4.10,
data: {},
children: []
}, {
id: node411,
name: 4.11,
data: {},
children: []
}]
},
Of course he properly closes up the JSON. I inserted id's (just an
auto-incrementing number) and the data portion where needed. The name:
is the part that has been the result of what you did before.
Here's the code... I did a bit of shuffling and actually tested against
a test db table:
?mysql :)
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tiers;
CREATE TABLE tiers
(
company INT NOT NULL,
tier1 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier2 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier3 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier4 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier5 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier6 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier7 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier8 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier9 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier10 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier11 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier12 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier13 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT '',
tier14 VARCHAR( 32 ) NOT NULLDEFAULT ''
);
INSERT INTO tiers (company, tier1, tier2, tier3) VALUES
(1, 'exec-001','sub-exec-011','sub-sub-exec-111'),
(1, 'exec-001','sub-exec-011','sub-sub-exec-112'),
(1, 'exec-001','sub-exec-012','sub-sub-exec-121'),
(1, 'exec-001','sub-exec-012','sub-sub-exec-122'),
(1, 'exec-002','sub-exec-021','sub-sub-exec-211'),
(1, 'exec-002','sub-exec-021','sub-sub-exec-212'),
(1, 'exec-002','sub-exec-022','sub-sub-exec-221'),
(1, 'exec-002','sub-exec-022','sub-sub-exec-222');
?
And here's the code:
?php
function getTiers( $company )
{
//
// Establish the root.
//
$sDb = ijinn_getServiceRef( 'dbManager' );
$db = $sDb-getConnectionRef();
$query =
SELECT DISTINCT
. *
.FROM
. tiers
.WHERE
. company = {$company} ;
$root = array();
if( $db-query( $query ) )
{
while( ($row = $db-fetchRow()) )
{
$focus = $root;
for( $i = 1; $i = 14; $i++ )
{
$name = trim( $row['tier'.$i] );
if( $name === '' )
{
break;
}
if( !isset( $focus[$name] ) )
{
$focus[$name] = array
(
'name' = $name,
'children' = array(),
);
}
$focus = $focus[$name]['children'];
}
}
}
$wrapper = array
(
'children' = $root
);
postProcessTiers( $wrapper );
return $root;
}
function postProcessTiers( $root )
{
$root['children'] = array_values( $root['children'] );
foreach( array_keys(
Re: [PHP] Node.PHP
As like Micheal's said said just keep up alive the project
I was preferes node.js to pho only when i needed send millions of ssl
api requests.
nodejs sends 1k https request in onky 2 second including parsing
required elements from database , check the returned source write to
file
if you want develope / clone more modules for that please start from
http|s.req :p and let me coninue at php
http://stackoverflow.com/a/9199961 my nodejs + php thing
2012/3/22, Michael Save savetheinter...@omegasdg.com:
Very nice!
I'll have a proper look at this in the morning, and I'll try it out
for myself. Looking forward to seeing more development on this.
Michael
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Moniz joseph.mo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
So i had my first Hackathon at work last week and my project was to
prototype making a node.js clone using PHP instead of V8. So i
snatched up libuv and joyent's HTTP parser and set off on a 24 hour
coding spree to get something workable. By the time the sun was coming
out the next morning the following code was working.
?php
$http = new node_http();
$http-listen(8080, function($request, $response) {
$response-end(yay, super awesome response);
});
nodephp_run();
?
The C code that powers it was whipped together really fast and is kind
of hackish as a result. The code has some memory leaks that i haven't
had time to fully track down yet. Some small portions of the code were
borrowed from the phode project.
In a naive benchmark on this simple server VS an equally simple server
in node.js this implementation already out performs node.js in
throughput by being able to serve just under 200% the amount of
requests per second that node.js could. Take that with a grain of salt
though because node.js has much more feature and is much more hardend
from production use. I do believe the PHP binary will have some major
performance gains over V8 as crossing the PHP -- C barrier seems to
be a much lighter operation then crossing the V8 -- C++ barrier.
Any help or feedback will be greatly appreciated. The projects source
code can be found here: https://github.com/JosephMoniz/node.php
- Joseph Moniz
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Node.PHP
Maybe stupid question, but is node.php really necessary? If you can program
PHP and it performs better than node.js, why would you need to have another
wrapper around things. Why not just program normal PHP?
twitter: geekdenz
Blog: http://www.thheuer.com
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Hiyarli Baba root...@gmail.com wrote:
As like Micheal's said said just keep up alive the project
I was preferes node.js to pho only when i needed send millions of ssl
api requests.
nodejs sends 1k https request in onky 2 second including parsing
required elements from database , check the returned source write to
file
if you want develope / clone more modules for that please start from
http|s.req :p and let me coninue at php
http://stackoverflow.com/a/9199961 my nodejs + php thing
2012/3/22, Michael Save savetheinter...@omegasdg.com:
Very nice!
I'll have a proper look at this in the morning, and I'll try it out
for myself. Looking forward to seeing more development on this.
Michael
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Moniz joseph.mo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
So i had my first Hackathon at work last week and my project was to
prototype making a node.js clone using PHP instead of V8. So i
snatched up libuv and joyent's HTTP parser and set off on a 24 hour
coding spree to get something workable. By the time the sun was coming
out the next morning the following code was working.
?php
$http = new node_http();
$http-listen(8080, function($request, $response) {
$response-end(yay, super awesome response);
});
nodephp_run();
?
The C code that powers it was whipped together really fast and is kind
of hackish as a result. The code has some memory leaks that i haven't
had time to fully track down yet. Some small portions of the code were
borrowed from the phode project.
In a naive benchmark on this simple server VS an equally simple server
in node.js this implementation already out performs node.js in
throughput by being able to serve just under 200% the amount of
requests per second that node.js could. Take that with a grain of salt
though because node.js has much more feature and is much more hardend
from production use. I do believe the PHP binary will have some major
performance gains over V8 as crossing the PHP -- C barrier seems to
be a much lighter operation then crossing the V8 -- C++ barrier.
Any help or feedback will be greatly appreciated. The projects source
code can be found here: https://github.com/JosephMoniz/node.php
- Joseph Moniz
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Node.PHP
Because normal PHP is not asynchronous.
Also, I kind of doubt you can outperform node.js with standard PHP.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, German Geek geek...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe stupid question, but is node.php really necessary? If you can program
PHP and it performs better than node.js, why would you need to have another
wrapper around things. Why not just program normal PHP?
twitter: geekdenz
Blog: http://www.thheuer.com
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Hiyarli Baba root...@gmail.com wrote:
As like Micheal's said said just keep up alive the project
I was preferes node.js to pho only when i needed send millions of ssl
api requests.
nodejs sends 1k https request in onky 2 second including parsing
required elements from database , check the returned source write to
file
if you want develope / clone more modules for that please start from
http|s.req :p and let me coninue at php
http://stackoverflow.com/a/9199961 my nodejs + php thing
2012/3/22, Michael Save savetheinter...@omegasdg.com:
Very nice!
I'll have a proper look at this in the morning, and I'll try it out
for myself. Looking forward to seeing more development on this.
Michael
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Joseph Moniz joseph.mo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
So i had my first Hackathon at work last week and my project was to
prototype making a node.js clone using PHP instead of V8. So i
snatched up libuv and joyent's HTTP parser and set off on a 24 hour
coding spree to get something workable. By the time the sun was coming
out the next morning the following code was working.
?php
$http = new node_http();
$http-listen(8080, function($request, $response) {
$response-end(yay, super awesome response);
});
nodephp_run();
?
The C code that powers it was whipped together really fast and is kind
of hackish as a result. The code has some memory leaks that i haven't
had time to fully track down yet. Some small portions of the code were
borrowed from the phode project.
In a naive benchmark on this simple server VS an equally simple server
in node.js this implementation already out performs node.js in
throughput by being able to serve just under 200% the amount of
requests per second that node.js could. Take that with a grain of salt
though because node.js has much more feature and is much more hardend
from production use. I do believe the PHP binary will have some major
performance gains over V8 as crossing the PHP -- C barrier seems to
be a much lighter operation then crossing the V8 -- C++ barrier.
Any help or feedback will be greatly appreciated. The projects source
code can be found here: https://github.com/JosephMoniz/node.php
- Joseph Moniz
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Could apc_fetch return a pointer to data in shared memory ?
Or: Why doesn't PHP have Applications variables like ASP.NET (and node.js) ? Hi, I'm working on optimising a php application (Drupal). The best optimisation I've found so far is to use APC to store various bits of Drupal data in RAM. The problem with this is that with Drupal requiring say 50Mb of data* per request is that lots of cpu cycles are wasted de-serialising data out of apc_fetch. Also 50Mb of data per http process !! is wasted by each one re-creating it's own copy of the shared data. If it were possible for apc_fetch (or similar function) to return a pointer to the data rather than a copy of the data this would enable incredible reduction in cpu and memory usage. This is essentially how ASP.NET Application variables and node.js work. I'm surprised PHP doesn't already have Application variables, given that they are so similar to Session Variables and that it's been around for a long time in ASP / ASP.NET. I just wondered if there was a reason for not having this functionality or if it's on a road map somewhere or I've missed something :) ?
