Re: [PHP] PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-20 Thread Dan Munro
 1. There are no statement terminators. Lose your indentation for ANY
 reason and your program is well and truly screwed, in ways you can't
 imagine.

 2. Python programs fail in the most ungraceful way I've ever seen in an
 interpreted programming language.

1. Indent properly. In php, if you put an open or close brace out of place
your code will break in unexpected ways as well. If it's hard to tell if
something is indented properly, your code should be refactored so that it
is.

2. In my experience this has a lot to do with how some people use python
and not python itself.


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Tedd Sperling tedd.sperl...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:24 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com
 wrote:

  On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:09:37PM +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
 
  shiplu wrote:
  During PHPvsPython search I found this info graphic
  https://www.udemy.com/blog/modern-language-wars/#. Some of the
  statistics contain Java too. Also you can search PHP and Web
  Development in big job sites and compare with same search but with
  Java.
 
  'Python is arguably the most readable programming language' probably
  says it all? Personally I find it almost impossible to understand
  when coming in cold to someone elses code ... Java is not much
  better ... but I still have to persist with both since some key
  elements of a usable PHP IDE now rely on both :(
 
  Python may be most readable, but it's a huge fail for two reasons:
 
  1. There are no statement terminators. Lose your indentation for ANY
  reason and your program is well and truly screwed, in ways you can't
  imagine.
 
  2. Python programs fail in the most ungraceful way I've ever seen in an
  interpreted programming language.

 And no ternary operator.

 tedd

 ___
 tedd sperling
 tedd.sperl...@gmail.com


 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




-- 
From the desk of Dan Munro


Re: [PHP] PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-20 Thread Dan Munro
 in my opinion, that would be like asking how big is the internet?.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/08/18/heres-what-you-find-when-you-scan-the-entire-internet-in-an-hour/


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote:

 2013/8/20 Steven Staples sstap...@mnsi.net

   My recent question was simply an attempt to get documentation to
 support
   which server-side Web Language is the most popular. Both PHP and Java
 can
   be used server-side.
  
   I also realize that Java is used for native Android because I also
 teach
   Mobile Application Development (MAD -- I even coined the name). So, I
 am
  up
   to my butt in languages (and people who think different than me) -- I'm
   just trying to get documentation to back up my what I think I know.
 
  Well, technically any language can be used server side, it is all on how
  you
  set up your server, no?
 

 No. But since node.js I lack an example :D But of course you need the
 link between the language and the network.


 
  I would tend to think that the biggest out there, is
 html/php/javascript...
  and next to that, would be asp, and then java.   Do I have proof of this?
  No, can I get proof, I doubt it, and are there stats on this? To be
 honest,
  in my opinion, that would be like asking how big is the internet?.  It
 is
  virtually an immeasurable object.  There are so many websites out there,
  that you can't search them all...
 

 Of course you cannot search them _all_, but again the link:
 http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/programming_language/all
 There are good hints, how the internet looks like. For example a hoster
 can simply look at the products he sell. Services like w3techs.com use the
 reports from the server themself (in most cases the headers), or the
 file-ending (doesn't work anymore that good, since most sites hide them ;))
 and extrapolate this.
 Of course they are not exact, but I think they show the direction quite
 accurate.


 
  PHP is simple, and yet powerful to use, and is pretty much the standard
 for
  all hosting companies.
 
  Now, there is this link...
  http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html
 
  It shows Java as #1, and php as #5, but this is also for PROGRAMMING,
 does
  not specify web based programming vs desktop vs MAD (thanks tedd ;) ) so
  the
  numbers do not really speak out in this application.
 

 Also it is the Tiobe-Index. Although it is widely-referenced, the way it
 calculates their rankings is ... interesting. In fact it only tells you how
 loud a community around a specific language is. So for example maybe Java
 is #1, because it is so complex, that it leads to many questions in forums
 and on stackoverflow. Or PHP is only #5, because most communication is on
 IRC, or mailinglists. (disclaimer: Of course I faked this examples.
 Actually I have no idea how the communities around Java and PHP as a
 whole interacts primary, but I don't think, that they are all equal).
 I just think, that the Tiobe-Index has a completely different view on what
 is a popular language, than I have.


 
  Does it really matter?   PHP is very huge, widely used, and I would even
 go
  so far as to say the 'norm' for website developers, and hosting
 providers.
 

 Nope, it doesn't matter :)


 
  But that is my $0.02, and for me, I have been with PHP for 7 years
  professionally, and in college I took VB.net, ASP.net, C++, JAVA and PHP.
  Only recently have I gotten into C# for desktop applications.
 
 
 
 
  --
  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
 
 


 --
 github.com/KingCrunch




-- 
From the desk of Dan Munro


Re: [PHP] PHP vs JAVA

2013-08-20 Thread Dan Munro
Zmap works by being stateless, so while nmap records which requests go out,
zmap fires and forgets, and encodes the request in such a way that the
response can provide whatever details it needs to continue the scan. No
magic here.


On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:

 Tedd Sperling wrote:

 I'm just trying to get documentation to back up my what I think I know.


 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Programming_languages_used_in_**
 most_popular_websiteshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_languages_used_in_most_popular_websitesmay
  be a better starting point, but there are no citations to the facts,
 they are a little dated, and some sites are a little biased in their
 choices? Move to the top 40 sites and PHP fares a little better -
 http://rogchap.com/2011/09/06/**top-40-website-programming-**languages/http://rogchap.com/2011/09/06/top-40-website-programming-languages/but
  but this data is a little dataed now.   Personally I've always used the
 W3techs figures when I'm doing talks as it is the only consistent source
 I've found. The netcraft figures would be nice but they only run this
 intermittently, and last January's figure of 244 million sites at 39% of
 machines seems a little at odds with the W3techs ones? http://w3techs.com/
 **technologies/history_overview/**programming_languagehttp://w3techs.com/technologies/history_overview/programming_languagecontinues
  to show PHP rising at the expense of ASP and Java with Perl, Ruby
 and Python having trouble to stay above 1% combined over the last year.


 --
 Lester Caine - G8HFL
 -
 Contact - 
 http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=**contacthttp://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact

 L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
 EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
 Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
 Rainbow Digital Media - 
 http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.**ukhttp://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk


 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php




-- 
From the desk of Dan Munro


Re: [PHP] Last Record INSERT

2013-06-26 Thread Dan Munro
Learning something new everyday is one of the joys of this profession. If
you learn two new things, consider yourself lucky :)


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Samuel Lopes Grigolato 
samuel.grigol...@gmail.com wrote:

 AFAIK mysql_[...] is deprecated in favor of mysqli_[...] correspondent
 functions, there's nothing to do specifically with mysql[i]_insert_id.


 On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Tedd Sperling tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  On Jun 26, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Stuart Dallas stu...@3ft9.com wrote:
   On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 18:39, Tedd Sperling wrote:
   Let me add, currently I am inserting an email address into a database.
  
   To find which record was created, I ask for the record number (ID)
 back.
  
   I am asking simply because mysql_insert_id() is deprecated.
 
  Now you tell me. :-)
 
  I learn something new every day of my life... and I'm getting damned
 tried
  of it.
 
  Back to the books.
 
  Thanks.
 
  Cheers,
 
  tedd
 
  _
  tedd.sperl...@gmail.com
  http://sperling.com
 
  --
  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
 
 




-- 
From the desk of Dan Munro