Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Steve Werby

"Jon Shoberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry
:)
>
> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes
dynamic
> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on
dynamic
> content or gives those pages a lower ranking.

Some do, some don't.

> I can't see this as being true. I epically can't see the search spider
"choking" on dynamic pages
> returning well-formed/valid HTML.

Well, some search engines see URLs with query strings at the end and assume
the content is dynamic.  And because a lot of dynamic content changes,
indexing dynamic webpages can lead to search results listing webpages that
no longer have the content that they did when they were indexed.  As a
result, searches on the search engine will be less effective and users may
choose to use a different search engine.  Anyone with dynamically generated
content that remains pretty static that wants these pages to be indexed by
search engines should make the webpages appear to be static.  I wrote about
this in another thread a couple of weeks ago.  Here's the message:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=98618455619989&w=2.  The sex
offender registries, news, books, sites, polls, etc. at one of the sites I
developed and administer are all dynamically generated using PHP and MySQL
and the site makes use of Apache's AliasMatch directive which allows me to
redirect most of the pages on the site to a single PHP file (I call it
template_1.php) which uses regular expressions to parse a page's URL and
include the proper content.  If you want to see it in action take a look at
http://www.sexcriminals.com/.

--
Steve Werby
President, Befriend Internet Services LLC
http://www.befriend.com/



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Mark Maggelet

Google doesn't choke at all on dynamic pages. pages get ranked by
keywords appearing on the page and even more importantly, the link
text of links on other pages pointing to the page that's being
indexed.

in other words, if a lot of sites link to your page like so:
google choke

then a search for 'google choke' will put you at the top. save your
time trying to get rid of ?'s and &'s and concentrate on promoting
your site the normal way.

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:47:43 + (GMT), Philip Olson
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Check out this article :
>
>  Building Dynamic Pages With Search Engines in Mind :
>  
>  http://phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2526.php3
>
>Also, mod_rewrite related "stuff" has been discussed :
>
>  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&s=mod_rewrite
>
>regards,
>philip
>
>On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Jon Shoberg wrote:
>
>>
>> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT
>>Industry :)
>>
>> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he
>>dislikes dynamic
>> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke'
>>on dynamic
>> content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as
>>being
>> true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic
>>pages
>> returning well-formed/valid HTML.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
>--
>PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread CC Zona

In article <9bho4e$r7p$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Plutarck") wrote:

> Also be extremely careful about the use of  and browser sniffing.
> So many sites do something classically stupid so that when someone sees
> their site in a search engine, the description is "Your browser does not
> support frames. Your browser must support frames to view this site."...I
> just want to slap the webmaster every time I see that.

I've been working on a mini-spider project that's been quite an eye-opener 
about another slap-worthy practice: an appalling number of splash pages 
consisting of nothing but a graphic (no alt tags, no title tag, no metas) 
and an "enter" link that must fetch its href from a javascript function.  
And these are sites that do want to be indexed!

-- 
CC

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Philip Olson

Check out this article :

  Building Dynamic Pages With Search Engines in Mind :
  
  http://phpbuilder.com/columns/tim2526.php3

Also, mod_rewrite related "stuff" has been discussed :

  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&s=mod_rewrite

regards,
philip

On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Jon Shoberg wrote:

> 
> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)
> 
> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
> content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
> true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
> returning well-formed/valid HTML.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> 
> -- 
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Plutarck

Getting listed in search engines really is important. But in the vein of
what you were talking about, people shouldn't really "worry" about it.

Note: Getting listed in directories like Yahoo is way more important than
having any search engine list you. You always receive a far more targeted
user with places like Yahoo, because they really do want to see what you
have to say.


Back on topic, the only search engines worth bothering with can handle
dynamic pages just fine. There is _no_ difference in a static html page and
a dynmically created one.

However, be _very_ careful with sessions. Sessions can force a query string
onto the end of every page on your first page, causing the spider to be
unable to visit any other page in your site!

Also be extremely careful about the use of  and browser sniffing.
So many sites do something classically stupid so that when someone sees
their site in a search engine, the description is "Your browser does not
support frames. Your browser must support frames to view this site."...I
just want to slap the webmaster every time I see that.


In short, on your index page (which is what you want bookmarked the most) do
not have links with query strings in them, do not use redirects, do not use
frames (period. if you want to use them everywhere else on the site that's
ok, but don't do it on the main page!), do not use session_start(), and do
not complain if the user has disabled javascript- if you want your site to
be well listed in search engines.

With all that taken into effect, I can see why the person you were talking
to disliked dynamic sites. But if the webmaster knows the rules of the
search engines, dynamic sites work just perfectly.


--
Plutarck
Should be working on something...
...but forgot what it was.


"Michael Kimsal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> Jon Shoberg wrote:
>
> > So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT
Industry :)
> >
> > In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes
dynamic
> > web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on
dynamic
> > content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
> > true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
> > returning well-formed/valid HTML.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Each spider is different, and they've changed over time.  Often they don't
> index a page that has a ? in it - they definitely won't be able to follow
> form input tags and such - the possibilities for input are limitless.
>
> Some can follow
> blah.com/index.php?alh=fff
>
> and links of that nature.  If you've got redirects in there,tho, they'll
often
> choke on those.
>
> Apache has an advantage over IIS because you can normally
> pass in parameters in the $PATH_INFO area -
> http://www.blah.com/index.php/blag/222/dsfsd/dlkjsdf
> calls the index.php with /blag/222/dsfsd/dlkjsdf as parameters you can
grab in
> your
> script.  IIS doesn't allow for this.  :(  (not natively anyway)
>
> Some search engines wouldn't FOLLOW a ? in a link,
> but will accept one as a 'submitted page' to index if you submit it
manually.
>
> Again, all of this information is necessarily vague.  What works one year
> doesn't work the next.
>
> This was all info and experienced gleaned while building keywordcount.com
a few
> years
> ago - the whole landscape has changed, and getting 'indexed' by search
engines
> is nice,
> but imo can be a big waste of time and money given that there are many
factors
> beyond your control entirely.  SEOs will bash me upside the head for that
one,
> but it's been my experiences over the past couple years.  :)
>
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Michael Kimsal



Jon Shoberg wrote:

> So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)
>
> In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
> web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
> content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
> true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
> returning well-formed/valid HTML.
>
> Any thoughts?

Each spider is different, and they've changed over time.  Often they don't
index a page that has a ? in it - they definitely won't be able to follow
form input tags and such - the possibilities for input are limitless.

Some can follow
blah.com/index.php?alh=fff

and links of that nature.  If you've got redirects in there,tho, they'll often
choke on those.

Apache has an advantage over IIS because you can normally
pass in parameters in the $PATH_INFO area -
http://www.blah.com/index.php/blag/222/dsfsd/dlkjsdf
calls the index.php with /blag/222/dsfsd/dlkjsdf as parameters you can grab in
your
script.  IIS doesn't allow for this.  :(  (not natively anyway)

Some search engines wouldn't FOLLOW a ? in a link,
but will accept one as a 'submitted page' to index if you submit it manually.

Again, all of this information is necessarily vague.  What works one year
doesn't work the next.

This was all info and experienced gleaned while building keywordcount.com a few
years
ago - the whole landscape has changed, and getting 'indexed' by search engines
is nice,
but imo can be a big waste of time and money given that there are many factors
beyond your control entirely.  SEOs will bash me upside the head for that one,
but it's been my experiences over the past couple years.  :)



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Philip Hallstrom

I'm not an expert in this, but I suspect that some search engines will
probably ignore URL's that look like this:

/path/to/dynamic.php?arg=1&foo=bar

because it sees the ? and knows that it's a dynamic result and perhaps
very likely to change.

I had always assumed that's why many sites (such as amazon) use urls
like this instead:

/path/to/dynamic.php/arg/1/foo/bar

which don't have the ? so perhaps the engine does cache it?

just my 2 cents.

-philip

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)
>
>In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
>web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
>content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
>true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
>returning well-formed/valid HTML.
>
>Any thoughts?

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Jeff Holzfaster

I too would be interested in learning what others on this list might have to
say about this.  Knowing how a search engine such as Google indexes a site
or a page might be a good starting point in answering this debate: dynamic
vs. static.

Jeff




So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)

In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
returning well-formed/valid HTML.

Any thoughts?


--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[PHP] Dynamic Pages and Google ???

2001-04-17 Thread Jon Shoberg


So I was having a conversation with a manager/educator in the IT Industry :)

In a discussion concerning search engines he stated how he dislikes dynamic
web pages (PHP/ASP/JSP/CFM) because search engine spiders 'choke' on dynamic
content or gives those pages a lower ranking.  I can't see this as being
true. I epically can't see the search spider "choking" on dynamic pages
returning well-formed/valid HTML.

Any thoughts?


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]