[PHP] Re: performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

2004-10-07 Thread Luis Bernardo 
You may find this useful: http://www.hudzilla.org/php/18_1_0.php

Hans H. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a
large
 include file, say 20-40 kb with 15 user-defined functions, of which maybe
3 or 4
 are used on any given page, or to have each function in it's own file and
 include (disk access/read) them only as needed.

 Is it faster/more efficient to read one large file or several smaller
ones?
 It's a RS Linux server with a gig of memory.

 I'm also looking at PHP Accelerator and such.  Do those store only in
memory
 what the script needs, or does it include all that you require or include
in, as
 well?

 Thanks,
 Hans

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: performance: large includes vs small includes with lots of reads

2004-10-07 Thread Curt Zirzow 
* Thus wrote Luis Bernardo:
 You may find this useful: http://www.hudzilla.org/php/18_1_0.php

paragraphs 2  3 should be deleted. telling someone that optimal
code is acceptable is like saying storing the year in a 2 char
field is perfectly fine.


Curt
-- 
The above comments may offend you. flame at will.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php