Re: [PHP] Viral Marketing PHP (was Re: [PHP] Computer Science and PHP)

2002-01-28 Thread DL Neil

Hello Manuel,

I have just re-read this, and am conscious that I am appearing to disagree with you, 
too frequently, yet in
overview I am wanting to agree!? I am a consultant, and I am well used to playing 
devil's advocate, ie
disagreeing with what is being said, in order to arrive at the best possible solution. 
Please don't interpret
anything said as grounds for a personal argument.

 Dl Neil wrote:
   One good point about what you said is that one budgetless what to
   promote PHP is to use 'viral marketing'. Viral marketing is a way to
   market something by using a technique that spreads by itself, ie, no
   additional effort or money needed to be spent by the originator to have
   the notice of what you want to market spread like crazy.
  ...
   sort what ideas can become viral. With that topic in the mind, if you
   ever figure a viral idea to promote PHP, just share it here to prove the
   concept as well! :-)
 
  I had intended that the 'institutional approach' be seen as the seeds of a viral 
marketing campaign. If
students
  learn the tool, when they 'go out to work' they want to use it. Even if the 
student is a 'hobbyist' then it
  still spreads the 'word' around...

 That is not viral enough because it is not smooth. When it is not
 smooth, not only it will propagate slowly but also it may stop
 propagating at all because word of mouth is not always convincing. To
 make it work smoothly it should not be hard to convince anybody that PHP
 is a good idea.

=I take it smooth means quick? Yes I agree propagation through 3- and 4-year 
training institutions will be
slow. However PHP can be quickly taught to anyone beyond a 'first steps in 
programming' course (hopefully after
they have graduated from an HTML course too. Thus a 'build on' or 'conversion' PHP 
course need not take long to
run, even as a night course (once/week, 2-3 hours/session).

=Years ago I can remember talking to one of the staff who was instrumental in getting 
ORACLE to market
(seriously) ORACLE Applications (accounting system). He told me that he considered 
that it would take five years
to get the product into IT Managers' (decision-makers) minds when they thought of 
buying an accounting package.
He figured that after those five, it would run for a further five years as the 
pre-eminent solution, ie the
first one anyone thought of; and then for the next five years it would start to 
'decline' as competitors tried
to 'take over'. He was arguing for methods of lengthening the middle five year period, 
or how essentially the
same product could be re-branded, so that it began a new 5/15 year cycle without the 
company having to invest in
a completely new product from scratch. [evidently he also didn't see SAP arriving!]

  Your point earlier, if statistics say x million dynamic web sites are held 
together by PHP, IT
managers/decision
  makers tend to feel they should take notice, eg Apache and the Netcraft surveys. 
The same will apply to PHP,
  numbers need to build to some 'critical mass' for corporate credibility to follow 
(as wrong as that sounds).

 Yes, but you only establish credibility when you manage to put your
 arguments in favour of PHP in the mouths of opinion makers. Statistics
 of PHP usage in the PHP site will never be credible enough. It is like
 when parents tell everybody how smart their kids are, see what I mean?

=not the mouths, but the ears of decision makers; and no I establish credibility 
(in myself) first and then
ask them to listen to my words. I liked the parents talking about kids analogy. 
However I disagree with the
analysis/application to this discussion. Which web site contains the most talking-up 
of M$ products? Which of
ORACLE? Which of IBM? etc. Why, there own of course!

=a lot of the talk on open source sites does not communicate with IT decision makers. 
It is talk by techies to
techies and of techies; and thus it (almost) never will. That point is most important. 
It is no good saying that
IT Managers are all brainless in (important) technical matters and should be first up 
against the wall; at least
not if you're attempting to convince them of something! There needs to be 
communication at the IT Manager
'level' (I return to my earlier references to SuSE's marketing approach).

=Now is a very good time to be doing this. There is a lot of bad press about M$, eg 
what's in XP that can really
be called an 'upgrade', what of the privacy/M$ 'control', major changes in bulk 
license pricing arrangements,
and some heavy-hitters (eg Gartners) who are raising the issue of M$ products with 
frequent needs for patching
and thereby a steeply increasing TCO (M$'s preferred term = Total Cost of Ownership). 
Talking in terms of lines
of debugged code per day, platform flexibility/neutrality, scaleability, 
maintainability, ease of use, security,
etc, is all far more entertaining (to an IT Manager looking to purchase/standardise on 
a tool) than the daily
interchanges of this discussion list!


Re: [PHP] Viral Marketing PHP (was Re: [PHP] Computer Science and PHP)

2002-01-26 Thread Manuel Lemos

Hello,

Dl Neil wrote:
  One good point about what you said is that one budgetless what to
  promote PHP is to use 'viral marketing'. Viral marketing is a way to
  market something by using a technique that spreads by itself, ie, no
  additional effort or money needed to be spent by the originator to have
  the notice of what you want to market spread like crazy.
 ...
  sort what ideas can become viral. With that topic in the mind, if you
  ever figure a viral idea to promote PHP, just share it here to prove the
  concept as well! :-)
 
 I had intended that the 'institutional approach' be seen as the seeds of a viral 
marketing campaign. If students
 learn the tool, when they 'go out to work' they want to use it. Even if the student 
is a 'hobbyist' then it
 still spreads the 'word' around...

That is not viral enough because it is not smooth. When it is not
smooth, not only it will propagate slowly but also it may stop
propagating at all because word of mouth is not always convincing. To
make it work smoothly it should not be hard to convince anybody that PHP
is a good idea.


 
 Your point earlier, if statistics say x million dynamic web sites are held together 
by PHP, IT managers/decision
 makers tend to feel they should take notice, eg Apache and the Netcraft surveys. The 
same will apply to PHP,
 numbers need to build to some 'critical mass' for corporate credibility to follow 
(as wrong as that sounds).

Yes, but you only establish credibility when you manage to put your
arguments in favour of PHP in the mouths of opinion makers. Statistics
of PHP usage in the PHP site will never be credible enough. It is like
when parents tell everybody how smart their kids are, see what I mean?

 
 How to get PHP into the institutions? You'd think it would be easy, wouldn't you - 
it's 'free', and that sounds

Being 'free' may be good for budgetless individuals but is the wrong
argument for institutions and companies in particular. You need to pick
up other argument.


 great! However you need competent/trained teachers/training staff. You need teaching 
materials and supporting
 text books. You need sample exercises and databases. Look at what SuSE are doing 
with email servers (etc) and
 RedHat with Linux distributions. Perhaps a distribution of LAMPS or the 'PHP Triad', 
especially configured for
 an educational environment could be considered? Finally you need people to be 
convinced that there's a demand
 for the teaching, and conversely students convinced that it is a valuable skill to 
acquire...

That is the core of the problem. You can only demonstrate there is
demand for teaching if you spread that there is demand for qualified
professionals. The PHP situation could be improved if there was an
officially certificated training, like some Linux distributions have and
even MySQL. The effect of spreading about official certification is that
it passes a good impression to those that are not aware that Linux and
MySQL is something being taken seriously to the point of having official
certifications like for certified Microsoft and Sun Java trainings.


Regards,
Manuel Lemos

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] Viral Marketing PHP (was Re: [PHP] Computer Science and PHP)

2002-01-24 Thread DL Neil

Hello Manuel,

  One other dimension, the institutions can only offer classes in the languages (and 
techniques/technologies)
that
  the trainers know and than they have the resources (hardware, 
compilers/interpreters) to cover.
 
  Maybe therein lies an answer to the 'marketing' side too. The best way to 'market' 
a new language, ie to
cause
  it to spread virulently (?virus-like) is by offering classes in the schools! 
Certainly when my customers ask
  about 'which tool' my first question is always, what skill sets do the staff 
have?.

 One good point about what you said is that one budgetless what to
 promote PHP is to use 'viral marketing'. Viral marketing is a way to
 market something by using a technique that spreads by itself, ie, no
 additional effort or money needed to be spent by the originator to have
 the notice of what you want to market spread like crazy.
...
 sort what ideas can become viral. With that topic in the mind, if you
 ever figure a viral idea to promote PHP, just share it here to prove the
 concept as well! :-)


I had intended that the 'institutional approach' be seen as the seeds of a viral 
marketing campaign. If students
learn the tool, when they 'go out to work' they want to use it. Even if the student is 
a 'hobbyist' then it
still spreads the 'word' around...

Your point earlier, if statistics say x million dynamic web sites are held together by 
PHP, IT managers/decision
makers tend to feel they should take notice, eg Apache and the Netcraft surveys. The 
same will apply to PHP,
numbers need to build to some 'critical mass' for corporate credibility to follow (as 
wrong as that sounds).

How to get PHP into the institutions? You'd think it would be easy, wouldn't you - 
it's 'free', and that sounds
great! However you need competent/trained teachers/training staff. You need teaching 
materials and supporting
text books. You need sample exercises and databases. Look at what SuSE are doing with 
email servers (etc) and
RedHat with Linux distributions. Perhaps a distribution of LAMPS or the 'PHP Triad', 
especially configured for
an educational environment could be considered? Finally you need people to be 
convinced that there's a demand
for the teaching, and conversely students convinced that it is a valuable skill to 
acquire...

Regards,
=dn



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




[PHP] Viral Marketing PHP (was Re: [PHP] Computer Science and PHP)

2002-01-23 Thread Manuel Lemos

Hello,

Dl Neil wrote:
 One other dimension, the institutions can only offer classes in the languages (and 
techniques/technologies) that
 the trainers know and than they have the resources (hardware, 
compilers/interpreters) to cover.
 
 Maybe therein lies an answer to the 'marketing' side too. The best way to 'market' a 
new language, ie to cause
 it to spread virulently (?virus-like) is by offering classes in the schools! 
Certainly when my customers ask
 about 'which tool' my first question is always, what skill sets do the staff have?.

One good point about what you said is that one budgetless what to
promote PHP is to use 'viral marketing'. Viral marketing is a way to
market something by using a technique that spreads by itself, ie, no
additional effort or money needed to be spent by the originator to have
the notice of what you want to market spread like crazy.

There are some bad examples of viral marketing, like chain letters or
selling address lists for unsolicited lists, but viral marketing can be
used to market a good thing. For instance, Hotmail did not use marketing
in the traditional media. They just added a footer in their users
messages to notice that they were sent using Hotmail. The rest is
history. Hotmail grown like crazy so much that even Microsoft bought it
instead of developing a competitor service.

Anybody can think of viral ideas to market PHP. You just need to focus
your brainstorm on what is really viral to make sure that with a little
effort and no budget you can make a serious impact promoting PHP.

There are certain caracteristics that distinguish what may become and
what will not become viral. Instead of detail that here I recommend Seth
Godin (former Yahoo marketing director) book Unleashing the idea
virus. Seth made the book available in full for free here to
demonstrate the concept. Palm Pilot and PDF versions are available:

http://www.ideavirus.com/01-getit.html

The book does not tell you how to create viral ideas, but rather how to
sort what ideas can become viral. With that topic in the mind, if you
ever figure a viral idea to promote PHP, just share it here to prove the
concept as well! :-)

Regards,
Manuel Lemos

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]