Re: Announce: PilBox - Building Android Apps in PicoLisp

2017-09-22 Thread Alexander Williams

I also vote +1 for submitting to f-droid.

Whoever takes care of the git repo, please **do not** include the arm64 
binaries as part of the repo, otherwise over time it will grow quite 
large (versioning) and become impossible to clone.



AW

On 17-09-21 11:02 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:43:02PM +0200, Richard Z wrote:

assuming it is OpenSource, how about submitting to f-droid.org?


This would be a good thing. F-Droid requires a git repo, perhaps of our
maintainers likes to take care of it? It would follow the same principles as we
have with the PicoLisp releases, i.e. importing the rolling release from
https://software-lab.de/PilBox.tgz

♪♫ Alex



--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Subscribe

2017-09-22 Thread Paul Rubin
Hello Paul Rubin  :-)
You are now subscribed




-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Arm64 Binaries in PilBox

2017-09-22 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi all,

to make building your own PilBox from https://software-lab.de/PilBox.tgz easier,
I've now included the picoLisp/ directory (had to be downloaded and installed
separately before), and pre-compiled the Arm64 binaries

   bin/picolisp
   picoLisp/bin/ssl
   openssl/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
   openssl/libssl.so.1.0.0

Now just

   $ ./mk.pilBox

should be enough to build a new APK.

♪♫ Alex

-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe