Re: LLVM16
Hi Mike, > LLVM16 released and PicoLisp successfully compiled out of the box and passed > all tests on it. > Happy coding. > > p.s. LLVM17-nightly works too so far. Very good, thanks for the tests! ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
LLVM16
hi all, LLVM16 released and PicoLisp successfully compiled out of the box and passed all tests on it. Happy coding. p.s. LLVM17-nightly works too so far. (mike) -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: Test with new From header
Test > On Apr 8, 2023, at 10:42, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Test, please ignore! > > ☺/ A!ex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
DMARC and the PicoLisp mailing list
Hi all, we noticed that many mails did not reach the members of this list, due to new DMARC policies of some e-mail providers. The problem is that DMARC uses the mail header's "From" address (and not the "Sender:"). But in a mailing list, this address is the author of the mail, and not the list server which relays the postings. As a result, the postings are not transmitted. I changed the PicoLisp mailer now, so that it puts the *name* of the sender (if known), combined with the e-mail address of the list, into the "From:" header, and the original "From:" address into "Sender:".. A drawback of this change is that now the author's real e-mail address is not immediately visible in e-mail clients. You have to inspect the "Sender:" header field to get it. Or is that even and advantage (privacy)? Let's see how this works out! ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Test with new From header
Test, please ignore! ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe