Re: [pinhole-discussion] PS4

2003-10-14 Thread Alexis Rago

Count me in.  It will be my first time taking part in a swap.
I have not participated in the discussion group for some time but I 
have kept track of

the topics

Alexis Rago




Re: [pinhole-discussion] Zone plates pinhole sieves

2003-04-29 Thread Alexis Rago

Dear Chris

I am impressed with you photos
they are a fantastic quality and the compositions are so right

Alexis




Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole

2003-03-07 Thread Alexis Rago

Good call Richard

Now I know how to avoid the Newton rings the occassionally occur.

Alexis




On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 10:41 PM, Richard Heather wrote:

This works finr but beware of Newton rings. It is best to keep the 
film off

of thr glass.
Richard Heather
- Original Message -
From: Alexis Rago ragowar...@btinternet.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:25 AM
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole



Brian

You do not need the film holder for scanning negatives or
transparencies on the Epson 2450.
The holder is used for getting thumbnails on the scanning software so
you can do some some things
before the image is scanned.
You can just place the negative under the light and the scan will take
place as a flatbed except you have
scanned a negative.
This can give a great deal more versatility and I have also found that
the thumbsnails software often
malfunctions.

Alexis


On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Brian Reynolds wrote:


callum moffat wrote:

any advice on the camera(which i havnt had a chance to use yet)the
film, and on scanning it using a microtek scanmaker 5600 gratefully
recieved


I use Polaroid Type 55 with lenses and pinholes.  Depending on where
you get your BW processed (I don't have a darkroom) Type 55 can be
cheaper than normal films plus development and contact.

The print and the negative are not the same speed, so you can't get
both from one exposure.  Normally I want the negative, and I use a
speed of ISO/ASA 25.  I haven't done any serious reciprosity testing,
but for long exposures I add a stop (after correcting for the pinhole
exposure).  Polaroid has datasheets up on their web page.

When I got my Epson 2450 scanner I discovered that Type 55 negatives
won't fit in the film holder.  They're a little bit wider than other
4x5 sheet films.

--
Brian Reynolds  | But in the new approach, as you
know,
reyno...@panix.com  |  the important thing is to 
understand
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what you're doing rather than to 
get

NAR# 54438  |  the right answer. -- Tom Lehrer

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/




___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/






Re: [pinhole-discussion] polaroid type 55 with pinhole

2003-03-07 Thread Alexis Rago

Brian

You do not need the film holder for scanning negatives or 
transparencies on the Epson 2450.
The holder is used for getting thumbnails on the scanning software so 
you can do some some things

before the image is scanned.
You can just place the negative under the light and the scan will take 
place as a flatbed except you have

scanned a negative.
This can give a great deal more versatility and I have also found that 
the thumbsnails software often

malfunctions.

Alexis


On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Brian Reynolds wrote:


callum moffat wrote:

any advice on the camera(which i havnt had a chance to use yet)the
film, and on scanning it using a microtek scanmaker 5600 gratefully
recieved


I use Polaroid Type 55 with lenses and pinholes.  Depending on where
you get your BW processed (I don't have a darkroom) Type 55 can be
cheaper than normal films plus development and contact.

The print and the negative are not the same speed, so you can't get
both from one exposure.  Normally I want the negative, and I use a
speed of ISO/ASA 25.  I haven't done any serious reciprosity testing,
but for long exposures I add a stop (after correcting for the pinhole
exposure).  Polaroid has datasheets up on their web page.

When I got my Epson 2450 scanner I discovered that Type 55 negatives
won't fit in the film holder.  They're a little bit wider than other
4x5 sheet films.

--
Brian Reynolds  | But in the new approach, as you 
know,

reyno...@panix.com  |  the important thing is to understand
http://www.panix.com/~reynolds/ |  what you're doing rather than to get
NAR# 54438  |  the right answer. -- Tom Lehrer

___
Post to the list as PLAIN TEXT only - no HTML
Pinhole-Discussion mailing list
Pinhole-Discussion@p at ???
unsubscribe or change your account at
http://www.???/discussion/