Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

[Martín Ferrari]

On 25/05/16 10:11, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support
> again?

Looks good. Now, I still haven't delved into this. How could I test it?


-- 
Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:golang-protobuf-extensions-dev is NEW.
source:golang-protobuf-extensions is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:golang-golang-x-sys-dev is NEW.
source:golang-golang-x-sys is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully 
to localhost
along with the files:
  golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1.dsc
  golang-protobuf-extensions_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
  golang-protobuf-extensions-dev_1.0.0-1~bpo8+1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded 
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1.dsc
  golang-golang-x-sys_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
  golang-golang-x-sys-dev_0.0~git20160517.0.d4feaf1-1~bpo8+1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

On 26 May 2016 at 06:34, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:10:34PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> Thanks. Can you upload?
>
> Sorry, I don’t have upload privileges :-(.
>
> My application for DM is pending:
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2016/05/msg00036.html

Ah, same :-)

Cheers,
mwh

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] github.com/XXX/YYY vs gopkg.in/XXX/YYY.v1

[Peter Colberg]

Hi all,

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:29:02AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 1:20:34 PM AEST Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > I need this package for use in gobgp which
> > uses it through github.com/eapache/channels.
> > 
> > Should I package golang-github-eapache-channels-dev or
> > golang-gopkg-eapache-channels.v1-dev?
> > 
> > In the first case, should I provide a symbolic link for
> > gopkg.in/eapache/channels.v1 or wait for anything else needing this
> > symbolic link?
> 
> I would go with first option because if package ever moves to .v2 you'll only 
> need to update "Provides" field (and symlink). Providing compatibility 
> symlink may be useful even if nobody uses it yet.

On the other hand, having golang-gopkg-….vN as separate source and
binary packages allows having multiple major versions in Debian when
applications depend on different major versions of a package.

I recently had a similar case where upstream started tagging release
upon our request (golang-gopkg-cheggaaa-pb.v1). I opted for packaging
the versioned source package separately, and filed an upstream bug for
the downstream package (acmetool) to import gopkg.in/cheggaaa/pb.v1.

Once all Build-Depends are converted to the versioned package, I will
request removal of the unversioned package (golang-github-cheggaaa-pb).


I think it would be wise to have the Go packaging policy recommend
one solution, compatibility symlinks or separate source packages.

Debian Go team members, what are your thoughts on gopkg.in versioning?

Would you support allowing for multiple major versions of a package?

Regards,
Peter

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

[Peter Colberg]

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:10:34PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> Thanks. Can you upload?

Sorry, I don’t have upload privileges :-(.

My application for DM is pending:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2016/05/msg00036.html

Peter

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#825275: golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev: missing Breaks+Replaces: golang-bindata-dev

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev
Version: 3.0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.

See policy 7.6 at
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Selecting previously unselected package golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev.
  Preparing to unpack .../golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb 
...
  Unpacking golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev (3.0.7-2) ...
  dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
   trying to overwrite 
'/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata/asset.go', which is also 
in package golang-bindata-dev 3.0.5-1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev_3.0.7-2_all.deb


cheers,

Andreas


golang-bindata-dev=3.0.5-1_golang-github-jteeuwen-go-bindata-dev=3.0.7-2.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support
again?

Cheers,
mwh

On 22 May 2016 at 14:51, Martín Ferrari  wrote:
> On 20/05/16 22:35, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>
>> It won't work for debian packages that have go packages that fail tests
>> (or fail to build!) in DH_GOLANG_EXCLUDES. You could argue that such
>> packages are broken, but there are definitely a few in the archive.
>> Perhaps we should just patch those tests out (// +build ignore, I guess)
>> instead...
>
> Yes. I think that go packages should pass tests as installed. If they
> don't, we should fix them
>
>
> --
> Martín Ferrari (Tincho)
>
> ___
> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

On 25 May 2016 at 04:50, Peter Colberg  wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:12:24AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback, all done in git. (I always forget that sbuild
>> doesn't run lintian on the source package!)
>
> Thanks for the updates.

Thanks. Can you upload?

> Do you have lintian enabled in .sbuildrc?
>
> # ~/.sbuildrc
> $run_lintian = 1;
> $lintian_opts = ['-i', '-I', '--color=always'];

I do, but IIRC that doesn't run lintian on the dsc, just on the debs.
Maybe I do not RC...

Cheers,
mwh

___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers